Then you surely understand why I will not relate the information you seek.
Literally?
Then you surely understand why I will not relate the information you seek.
I completely understand your cowardice.
You are afraid I will make fun of you.
On an anonymous message board.
On the internets.
4)Relate why withholding personal information from an obvious and self-admitted troll, or any anonymous internet figure, is cowardice.
It's not my fault you feel the need to ridicule others.
I am not being a troll in this case, and the cowardice is self-evident.
It's ok, there are many posters who are just as scurred as you. Once I ask a few questions that make them uncomfortable, they shut up about whatever the thread subject is and start whining about me.
First off, you are always a troll unless relating toros information.
Second, if you honestly feel so compelled to continue calling me a coward, continue on unabated.
yeah, you are so scary, that anonymous face, the overuse of leading questions since you have nothing to contribute, the admission of trolling along with that big post count. I am dreadfully frightened. In fact, since you're so sure, you could just answer these statements, with quotes to prove your stance:It's ok, there are many posters who are just as scurred as you.
1) Relate where the first insult was thrown.
2) Relate which of your responses caused me to be "butthurt." Follow up with your reasoning why I would become "butt hurt."
3) Relate why withholding personal information from an obvious troll, or any anonymous internet figure, is cowardice.
4) Prove I even have a belief system, or am not an atheist who simply finds evolution an unsatisfactory explanation.
You take a lot of pride in being a bag.Once I ask a few questions that make them uncomfortable, they shut up about whatever the thread subject is and start whining about me.![]()
Nah.
The shoe fits.Second, if you honestly feel so compelled to continue calling me a coward, continue on unabated.
Then why can't you answer a simple question?yeah, you are so scary, that anonymous face, the overuse of leading questions since you have nothing to contribute, the admission of trolling along with that big post count. I am dreadfully frightened.
Are you an atheist?
The shoe fits.
Why are you so eager to know?Then why can't you answer a simple question?
Nah. Not in this case.
I'm curious. Knowing might make the thread more interesting than just saying I'm a troll.Why are you so eager to know?
Are you an atheist?
Him and Shasta do this game all the time. When they cannot answer your question (happens alot) they get into a ridiculously off topic thing like this and harp on it. Then they do this peer pressuring tactic of asking why. It's lame and I try not to even read or respond to their nonsense but sometimes they get me.
They add nothing to the conversation except a view of our one-sided college education system.
Past words dictate otherwise. In fact, there's never been a non-dleague related post I've seen from you that wasn't troll oriented.
The shoe fits.
I don't believe you.I'm curious.
Do you believe in a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis?
Nah. There have been plenty otherwise. I doubt you have read all my posts at any rate.
I believe it would make the thread much more interesting than just calling me a troll. I truly believe that.I don't believe you.
Five years at this forum has educated me well on Chump's tactics. When he doesn't have anything to say (which is often), he simply asks leading questions. He never reveals his own position besides inferences made from the type of questions he asks. It's fine, I enjoy many of his troll attempts but it doesn't change the fact he is one.
I am not an atheist.
Are you an atheist?
No way am I getting in your re ed game. I like zosa's stand and feel I already told you too much. Stay on a topic.
"get off Obama's balls" -Jay Z
The origin of life is the topic.
This has nothing to do with Obama or his balls that you are on.
Fair enough. And how exactly have you deduced I am a coward, other than my freely admitted 'fallacy' of not relating personal information to trolls?
Wouldn't an objective view of my position essentially guarantee I am not a coward?
This thread isn't just about me calling you a troll. Don't flatter yourself.I believe it would make the thread much more interesting than just calling me a troll. I truly believe that.
Not really. Refusing to discuss on a discussion board because one fears ridicule is cowardly.
You've pretty much made it that.This thread isn't just about me calling you a troll. Don't flatter yourself.
You aren't the first.
I am not an atheist.
Are you an atheist?
That's true how you wrote it - but it does not apply in our current exchange. Discussion can only be held when what is related directly pertains to the subject matter at hand. Whether or not I am an atheist does not pertain to the OP's post, nor my arguments.
And, anyone who defends creationism or criticizes evolution in this day and age is the opposite of a coward, IMO. You are free to continue holding your belief that I am coward, however unsubstantiated it is.
Just like you've pretty much turned this thread into your own personal trolling z0sa ground.You've pretty much made it that.
There's that pride showing again.You aren't the first.
I previously asked you what your theory of the origin of life is.
Let's go with that one.
Not really. Just trying to find out what your theory of the origin of life is.Just like you've pretty much turned this thread into your own personal trolling z0sa ground.
It's a mere statement of fact.There's that pride showing again.
So now that we can get back to the subject:
What is your theory of the origin of life?
I was joking about the Jay Z. It popped in my head. My view on the origin of life I care not discuss at this time or with you. I believe however that the theory of evolution is just that- a theory. It is ridiculous how our school system has took and ran with this and refuse to teach the theory of creationism. Alot of people I talk to believe in evolution because they think it is a proven truth. I was also only taught evolution my entire educational career. I had to read up on how 1. evolution is not a proven science, and 2. what creationism is. I have no problem our school system teaching evolution, but it should be taught as a theory, and theory of creationism should be taught as well.
I doubt you would give it an open minded chance but Ben Stein did a movie about the shutting out of creationist teaching and anyone who questions evolution.
What does this have to do with intermediate pterodactyls? Keep in mind you are admitting to a troll attempt if it has no relation.
So what would a creationist curriculum entail? It seems like it could be covered in one class period if not less.
I'm just trying to see how a creationist education could prepare one for scientific work.
I think the main reason evolution is preached in public school is because it involves no supernaturality, so to speak. It's the only way to truly separate church and state, sadly. Additionally, almost any religion can learn it and fit it in somehow, and in this same way, no specific religion is required to believe its principles. Creationism gets you into the topic of religion, inevitably - and religion at odds with a different religion in the same area, usually means conflict. It'd most likely be worse in a classroom with children or young adults who (mostly) aren't even sure of their own beliefs yet.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)