Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5678910 LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 232
  1. #201
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Obama sells guns to mexican cartels and then talks in mexico how we need more gun control to stop american sold guns getting into mexico. classic mcgruber.

  2. #202
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    What is your evidence Obama sold the guns?

  3. #203
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669

  4. #204
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    It sure didn't with the last president, and you cheered.

  5. #205
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    I'm only seeing one cheerleader right now.

  6. #206
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    I'm only seeing one cheerleader right now.
    I never supported this particular policy.

    And make no mistake, you're still cheering.

  7. #207
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    No, I just don't tend to dwell on points where I believe there to be agreement.

    Broadly, the assertion that the U.S. is complicit in the murders suited my characterization they were to blame. I don't think I was trying to make a legal determination of complicity. But, you latched on and away we went.

    I may make it my practice to be as precise as possible and repeat my original assertion in every post so you can't get off track.

    In this case; I believe the U. S. Government bears a good portion of the responsibility for the murders of more than 300 Mexican nationals and at least one U. S. Law Enforcement Officer due to their actions in the Fast and Furious scandal.

    I believe -- because they've admitted so -- the U. S. Government facilitated the straw purchases of thousands of weapons from gun stores, in America, by persons known to them to be associated with Mexican drug cartels.

    I believe -- because they've admitted so -- the U. S. Government allowed those guns to be conveyed across the international border between Mexico and the United States by persons known to them to be associated with Mexican drug cartels.

    And, I believe -- because there is do entary evidence -- the ATF proposed to use the murders, committed with the weapons they allowed into Mexico, as a pretext for ins uting more gun regulations.

    By the way, if you'd bother to look at the record -- particularly the latest do ent dump -- there is also evidence ATF was tracking the increase in murders with the ramping up of the gun walking.

    Why?
    It was imprecise. I do not believe, nor do I contend, the United States Government was directly, legally, complicit in the murder of more than 300 Mexican nationals and at least one U. S. Law Enforcement Officer.

    I believe the U. S. Government bears a good portion of the responsibility for the murders of more than 300 Mexican nationals and at least one U. S. Law Enforcement Officer due to their actions in the Fast and Furious scandal.

    I believe -- because they've admitted so -- the U. S. Government facilitated the straw purchases of thousands of weapons from gun stores, in America, by persons known to them to be associated with Mexican drug cartels.

    I believe -- because they've admitted so -- the U. S. Government allowed those guns to be conveyed across the international border between Mexico and the United States by persons known to them to be associated with Mexican drug cartels.

    And, I believe -- because there is do entary evidence -- the ATF proposed to use the murders, committed with the weapons they allowed into Mexico, as a pretext for ins uting more gun regulations.

    I believe crimes have been committed by U. S. agents. I believe the U. S. Government -- up to and possibly including the Attorney General and President of the United States, condoned or even encouraged these crimes.
    , you're tedious.

  8. #208
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    quod est demonstrandum, or something like that
    quod erat demonstrandum

  9. #209
    Vote For JFK2 JohnnyMarzetti's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    1,374
    I believe yoni has a hair up his ass over nothing as usual.

  10. #210
    All Hail the Legatron The Reckoning's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    10,568
    i thought it was about fast cars and not guns?

  11. #211
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    RG and FuzzyLumpkins, lately.
    Yes, I have been feeling left out a little.

  12. #212
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,787
    You care? I'm touched!


  13. #213
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Republicans' Phony Outrage at DEA Money Laundering Activities

    The height of Republican hypocrisy is the phony outrage of Congressman Darryl Issa at the DEA's money laundering stings, particularly in Mexico. These stings are as old as the hills and well-publicized. (Issa's absurd letter to AG Eric Holder is here.) Even Fox News says he's missed the beat on this one.

    The Justice Department and the State Department acknowledged the laundering this week. The DEA issued this statement earlier this week confirming it.

    Why wouldn't they? DEA, the IRS and Customs (now ICE) have been engaging in undercover laundering of proceeds for drug traffickers at least since Ronald Reagan was President. Republicans crowed about the stings then. [More...]

    The money laundering statute expressly provides for stings. From the U.S. Attorney's Manual:

    Section 1956(a)(3) relates to undercover operations where the financial transaction involves property represented to be proceeds of specified unlawful activity. The proceeds in § 1956(a)(3) cases are not actually derived from a real crime; they are undercover funds supplied by the Government. The representation must be made by or authorized by a Federal officer with authority to investigate or prosecute money laundering violations. The representation may also be made by another at the direction of or approval of a Federal officer.

    The money laundering statute also provides for extra-territorial jurisdiction (see 1956(b)(2).

    Here are the guidelines from the IRS Manual, Section 9.5.5.2.1.3 (08-27-2007)" le 18 USC §1956(a)(3), Sting Operations" and Section 9.4.8, Undercover Operations.

    (On a related note, it was President Reagan, who in 1986, signed a "secret" National Security Decision Directive (#221) declaring that international drug trafficking was a matter of national security and authorizing the use of military personnel in foreign anti-drug campaigns.)

    In 1980, there was Operation Swordfish, a drug and money laundering sting. As the DEA describes it:

    The DEA set up a bogus money laundering corporation in suburban Miami Lakes that was called Dean International Investments, Inc. The DEA agents teamed up with a Cuban exile who had fallen on hard times and was willing to lure Colombian traffickers to the bogus bank. ...During the 18-month investigation, agents were able to gather enough evidence for a federal grand jury to indict 67 U.S. and Colombian citizens. At the conclusion of the operation, drug agents seized 100 kilos of cocaine, a quarter-million methaqualone pills, tons of marijuana, and $800,000 in cash, cars, land, and Miami bank accounts. Operation Swordfish was a significant attack on South Florida's flourishing drug trade.

    http://www.talkleft.com/story/2011/12/7/12029/6361

  14. #214
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Hey, Yoni, here's a great history of the St Ronnie and his politicized CIA fueling the drug business

    The Warning in Gary Webb's Death

    But Webb's suicide on the evening of Dec. 9, 2004, was also a tragic end for one man whose livelihood and reputation were destroyed by a phalanx of major newspapers - the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times - serving as protectors of a corrupt power structure rather than as sources of honest information.

    In reviewing the story again this year, I was struck by how Webb's Contra-cocaine experience was, in many ways, a precursor to the subsequent tragedy of the Iraq War.

    In the 1980s, the CIA's analytical division was already showing signs of politicization, especially regarding President Ronald Reagan's beloved Contras and their war against Nicaragua's Sandinista government - and the U.S. press corps was already bending to the propaganda pressures of a right-wing Republican administration.

    Looking back at CIA cables from the early-to-mid-1980s, you can already see the bias dripping from the analytical reports. Any drug accusation against the leftist Sandinistas was accepted without skepticism and usually with strong exaggeration, while the opposite occurred with evidence of Contra cocaine smuggling; then there was endless quibbling and smearing of sources.

    So, to put these reports in anything close to an accurate focus, you would need special lenses to correct for all the politicized distortions. Yet, the U.S. news media, which itself was under intense pressure not to appear "liberal," worsened the Reagan administration's fun-house reflection of reality and attacked any dissident journalist who wouldn't go along.

    Thus, Americans heard a lot about how the evil Sandinistas were trying to "poison" America's youth with cocaine, although there was not a single interception of a drug shipment from Nicaragua during the Sandinista reign, except for one planeload of cocaine that the United States flew into and out of Nicaraguan in a clumsy "sting" operation.

    On the other hand, substantial evidence of Contra-related cocaine shipments out of Costa Rica and Honduras was kept from the American people with Reagan's Justice Department and CIA intervening to head off investigations and thus prevent embarrassing disclosures. The chief role of the big newspapers in this upside-down world was to heap ridicule on anyone who told the truth.

    During that time frame of the early-to-mid-1980s, the patterns were set for CIA analysts to advance their careers (by giving the president what he wanted) and mainstream journalists to protect theirs (by accepting propaganda). By 2002-2003, these patterns had become deeply engrained, leaving almost no one to protect the American people from a new round of falsehoods - aimed at Iraq.

    http://readersupportednews.org/opini...ry-webbs-death

  15. #215
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,787
    He fessed up to using the TRO screen name and plagiarism, for example.
    wants to get caught. how poignant.

  16. #216
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    At the conclusion of the operation, drug agents seized 100 kilos of cocaine, a quarter-million methaqualone pills, tons of marijuana, and $800,000 in cash, cars, land, and Miami bank accounts.

    ahhhhh....qualudes...

    THAT was the good old days...

  17. #217
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,787
    these are the good old days for somebody

  18. #218
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,787
    i believe yoni has a hair up his ass over nothing as usual.
    +1

  19. #219
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Nice you believe our government being involved in arming a ruthless cartel that then murdered 300+ Mexicans is "nothing."

  20. #220
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Yoni's ok with 5000 US military wasted in Iraq, but 300+ Mexicans, he wants to lynch the n!gga.

  21. #221
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,787
    Nice you believe our government being involved in arming a ruthless cartel that then murdered 300+ Mexicans is "nothing."
    you having a hair up your ass is nothing. there's a subtle difference.

  22. #222
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    you having a hair up your ass is nothing. there's a subtle difference.
    Except he said "over nothing."

  23. #223
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,787
    semantics. more hairsplitting.

  24. #224
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,787
    like I said, there's a subtle difference

  25. #225
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    like I said, there's a subtle difference
    You're right, there is a difference but, you +1'd Marzetti saying the 300+ deaths were nothing.

    You're the one playing semantics and parsing what you've posted. Getting to be a habit.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •