Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 356
  1. #201
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,665
    I can understand your sentiments but the Spurs have to draft somebody...Grant Jerrett is a better defender than Kelly and Bullock is the same as Danny Green but at the SF position. He's a role player who's excellent at perimeter defense and 3 pt shooting. Think of a better/younger version of Bruce Bowen.
    I'm not at all sure that Jerret is a better defender than Kelly -

    http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebaske...s-defense-most .
    http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bask...ht-foot-injury Note the sidebar opponents shooting 22% against Kelly, 3ed in the country in points allowed per play
    http://www.cbssports.com/collegebask...nst-louisville

    IIRC the only games Duke lost this year, all happened when Kelly was out.
    http://charlotte.cbslocal.com/2013/0...th-ryan-kelly/

    Meanwhile DX says this about Jerret's defence:
    On the defensive end of the floor, Jerrett lacks the lateral quickness to stay in front of skilled big men. Additionally, while he hedges hard guarding the pick and roll, he often struggles to get back into position. That being said, in both instances, he uses his length to stay involved, trailing the play, and is often able to contest the shot from behind once his man takes the ball to the hoop.

    He blocked 2.1 shots per 40 minutes pace adjusted, as well, a testament to his length and instincts. In the post, Jerrett shows a solid feel on this end, and puts a good effort in as well. His high center of gravity and lack of lower body strength make it difficult for him to hold his position against bigger offensive players at this stage , but there are some things to work with here long term. Ultimately, Jerrett is a willing defender, inside and out, though his physical limitations and lack of toughness present some question mark as to whether he can guard NBA-level power forwards.

    Arguably his worst quality on either end of the floor, however, is well below average rebounding, where he grabs just 7.9 rebounds per 40 minutes pace adjusted. This ranks him as the second worst rebounder among power forwards in this draft or centers in our top-100 and, unlike Ryan Kelly, he spends quite a bit of time in the low post on the defensive end of the floor. Looking towards the NBA, this is arguably the one thing that he most needs to improve on, focusing on boxing out and beating his man to the errant shots, and showing greater intensity and desire to make his presence felt on this end of the floor.
    From DraftExpress.com http://www.draftexpress.com#ixzz2UGADK9YJ
    http://www.draftexpress.com
    With regards to Bullock, there is simply not a chance in he can hold Bruce Bowen's jockstrap defensively. He is also not a need: we have a quality SF - Kawhi. You are proposing drafting a low trade value role-player, in the least valuable of the positions (Big > PG > Wing), where we have no need, and we can't be confident that he's even the best player available...
    Last edited by pad300; 05-24-2013 at 07:41 PM.

  2. #202
    Believe (in Bertans) ABC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    390
    I believe ABC posted a list of tradeable players earlier in this thread.
    I brought it forward and made Bruno's and Chinook's corrections:

    Can be traded on draft night: Parker, Duncan (can reject trade with no trade clause), Bonner, Green, Leonard, De Colo, Joseph, Baynes, and players whose rights the Spurs hold

    Can be traded on draft night if they pick up their player option before the draft: Diaw, Mills

    Cannot be traded on draft night: Ginobili, Splitter, Blair, Neal, McGrady

  3. #203
    Learn2Excel TheCerebral1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    600
    See why would Washington trade up. Porter who fits their needs is a better player than Nerlens Noel is. In fact, I believe Bennett, Oladipo, McLemore, Burke are all better players than he is. Noel has bust written all over him. Take into consideration that he weighed in at a laughable 206 lbs at the combine and he's not even a dominant rebounder. He has Kwame Brown written all over him. May be a nice kid, but come on.

  4. #204
    Kiwi, Advanced Stat Fan
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    1,146
    From APBR

    What combine stats did you find have a positive correlation to success?


    When I was including them alongside the boxscore statistics, no step vertical and standing reach were the only predictors worth including.

    Now that I tried applying combine stats post-hoc for the newer data (including it in a regression along with the predictions posted in the parent post such that -- [Observed Wins ~ Predicted Wins + No step vert + Standing reach] I found some interesting things:

    1) Standing reach is now a negative. What that tells me is that while standing reach is obviously important to playing basketball, if you can't use it to record rebounds/blocks/points... in college, you won't figure out how to use it in the pros and some of the stats you got just by being bigger than anyone else will be tougher to come by.
    2) No step vert is still informative, but the effect was really weak until I included an interaction term between predicted wins and no step vert. Basically, if you don't look like a good prospect based on the box score stats it doesn't matter how high you can jump. However, as your expected production increases, being able to jump out the building becomes an increasingly important predictor of your ceiling.
    So, there is some value in combine stats for prediction, but mostly they don't effect anything. So being a freak athlete doesn't matter for DJ Stephens, but it does for Noel(assuming as he didn't test)/Zeller.

  5. #205
    Learn2Excel TheCerebral1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    600
    I'm all about Nogueira, Tim Hardaway Jr. (love his game), C.J. Leslie, Dario Saric (if he falls), Jamal Franklin, Deshaun Thomas and others.

  6. #206
    Transition 3 Willbreaker Captivus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    4,881
    If I'm Cleveland I'm trading the 1st pick. The problem I think is finding a team that really wants him and is willing to trade.
    This can only be done with either the Magic, Wizards, Bobcats and maybe the Suns, so that Cleveland can get a good pick in return a player.
    Dont know what players these team have that can be of value for Cleveland.

  7. #207
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,195
    I'm all about Nogueira, Tim Hardaway Jr. (love his game), C.J. Leslie, Dario Saric (if he falls), Jamal Franklin, Deshaun Thomas and others.
    You can add to that list; Giannis Adetokunbo, Archie Goodwin, Sergey Karsev, and Mike Muscall..DE/DN

    I guess from the Spurs point of view is any of these players better then Neal, and Blair? Also are they better then our foreign draft picks..Bertrans, Hanga, Ryan?

  8. #208
    HTTR Ditty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    7,205
    1.Giannis Adetokunbo
    2. Archie Goodwin
    3. Lucas Nogueira

    in order have probably the best potential out of all the players that could be at 28.

  9. #209
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    604
    I hope SPURS draft Goodwin or Franklin to fill the SG gap and fill the backup SF by signing players like Nocinoi. Spurs needs an athletic SG with quick first step, long wingspan and being able to change speed to break down defense and draw fouls. SPURS probably could trade De Colo to trade up to get such player.

  10. #210
    tangina ka, though FireMicoHalili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    1,569
    wishlist: Lucas Nogueira, Sergey Karasev, Mam Jaiteh, Gorgui Dieng, Livio Jean-Charles, Dario Saric

    I wouldn't take Kelly Olynyk even if he fell to 58

  11. #211
    Believe. Tyrone Jenkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    480
    In terms of who makes the most sense for the Spurs to pick up - one only need to look 3-5 years into the future and speculate about the iden y of the team at that time.

    Right now, the Spurs are, obviously, two teams: one w/ Parker on the floor, the other without him. W/ him, they're a a pick and roll/pop team where Tony creates off the dribble and either hits Tiago or Tim on the roll after the pick, hit one of the shooters (Kawhi, Green, etc.) on the perimeter or drive and either finish at the rim or hit a mid-range.

    With him off the floor, the offense is primarily a ball movement offense that does contain some pick and roll. Ginobili (if he's in when Tony's out) is the new creator. If he's out, then whoever is on the floor is essentially running the standard play (baseline cut off the single or double screen) to get the best shot - usually a 3 - available.

    Well, 3-5 years from now when Tony is 34-37 years old, he won't be able to create in the same fashion (mostly due to speed). He'll be smarter but slower - so the creation will most likely include more passing to shooters. Also, Kawhi should have emerged by then as a greater force in the league and could supplant Tony as the feature of the offense. Lastly, Timmy will be gone and there needs to be someone who can score more effectively than Tiago down low (perhaps a FA pickup of some sort).

  12. #212
    Kiwi, Advanced Stat Fan
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    1,146
    Again, from APBR stats board Draft projection thread (http://apbr.org/metrics/viewtopic.ph...=8242******=15)



    The methodology is on that thread, and will get constantly updated over the next month. The big takeaway for me is that Mike Muscala is probably a really good option at 28.

  13. #213
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    224
    Please, for gods sake, if we are talking about a Matt Bonner replacement, take Ryan Kelly (Duke) before Grant Jerrett... but let's not replace Matt Bonner with another 1D shooter. Instead, take Tony Mitc with the 28th if possible.

    Regarding Bullock, if you project a guy as Danny Green, you don't draft him. You can get 3 and D talent from the D-league - as Danny himself illustrates. Use the draft to go for serious talent - either undervalued NCAA players (Kawhi, Cojo, George Hill), or foreigners who will develop overseas (eg Bertans, Tiago).
    I have been very impressed with Reggie Bullock. While Bullock and Green cab both play good D and both can shoot the 3, that's where the similarities end. Bullock is faster, stronger, an inch taller and is quite a bit meatier. And unlike Green, Bullock is a good ball handler and can score at spots on the floor that are not just behind the arc.

    At 6'7" Bullock could even play some SF.

    I do NOT project him as a "Danny Green" type. Rather, I project him as better than Danny at pretty much every turn.

  14. #214
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    224

    Meanwhile DX says this about Jerret's defence:


    With regards to Bullock, there is simply not a chance in he can hold Bruce Bowen's jockstrap defensively. He is also not a need: we have a quality SF - Kawhi. You are proposing drafting a low trade value role-player, in the least valuable of the positions (Big > PG > Wing), where we have no need, and we can't be confident that he's even the best player available...
    1) at 21 years old Bruce Bowen wasn't a lock down/all NBA defender either.

    2) Bullock is faster, stronger and better dribbler/penetrator than Danny Green. At only 1" taller than Green, why would you even begin to assume that he's a Small Forward? The fact is Green doesn't really have 2 guard skills (on offense).

    3) since neither Green nor Leonard are great (or even adequate) or consistent at dribble penetration, and since Bullock appears to be qualified to do so....at both positions....., where is the downside?

  15. #215
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    ^Paranoid_Pop, is that you?

  16. #216
    Believe. SanDiegoSpursFan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    3,076
    I like Muscala a lot too. Every advanced stat points to him being a very great college player and indicates that he would be an outstanding pro. I think the Spurs should take him even if Withey is still on the board.

  17. #217
    Believe. Tyrone Jenkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    480
    1) at 21 years old Bruce Bowen wasn't a lock down/all NBA defender either.

    2) Bullock is faster, stronger and better dribbler/penetrator than Danny Green. At only 1" taller than Green, why would you even begin to assume that he's a Small Forward? The fact is Green doesn't really have 2 guard skills (on offense).

    3) since neither Green nor Leonard are great (or even adequate) or consistent at dribble penetration, and since Bullock appears to be qualified to do so....at both positions....., where is the downside?
    Bullock is the quintessential Spurs wing player. He may not be a lockdown defender at 21 but who is? He will be a welcome backup to Kawhi at the 3 and Green at the 2.

  18. #218
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,195
    Who knows what the Spurs are going to do in the first round but am starting to like Archie Goodwin/SG - I would though love for the Spurs to get a extra second round pick maybe trade De Colo and pick up Rodney Williams 6'7SF Minnesota and Augusto Lima 6'9 PF Brazil.

  19. #219
    Learn2Excel TheCerebral1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    600
    Lucas Nogueira, Mike Muscala, Tony Mitc , Jamal Franklin, with guys like Archie Goodwin, Bullock, etc being looked at. Someone like Mitc or Muscala depending on where they fall in the twenties could easily replace Blair. Franklin and Bullock to replace Neal I suppose. I really like Franklin/Mithcell/Nogueira.

  20. #220
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    Some recent opinions about Euro players Abrines, Todorovic, Nedovic, Jean Charles
    http://www.thedreamshake.com/2013/5/...-international

  21. #221
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    20,362
    Spurs have worked out Reggie Bullock, Tim Hardaway Jr and James Southerland so far.

  22. #222
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Spurs have worked out Reggie Bullock, Tim Hardaway Jr and James Southerland so far.
    Kind of telling... Each are SFs.

  23. #223
    No Spurs No DrunkTXLabrat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    1,867
    southerland would be pretty good. long hands and good wingspan, good lane agility time. been playing well for a coach boehiem.

  24. #224
    veni, vidi, vici naico's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    1,275
    Chris Mannix ‏@ChrisMannixSI1m
    Mavericks continuing to shop the No. 13 pick to preserve cap space for this summer. Several execs say they are not asking for much, either

  25. #225
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Which is better:

    Houston Trade - Bonner for Robinson + Houston's 2nd
    Dallas Trade - Bonner + Decolo/Neal for Dallas's 13th + 2nd

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •