Reply With Quote
I couldn't be happier without mine.
Keep crying about yours that they haven't taken yet.
not my wife
damn
I couldn't be happier without mine.
Keep crying about yours that they haven't taken yet.
Crying? We talking bout crying? crying? Do you really want the cuckold thread re-posted here?
How bout we get back to the actual discussion at hand. I'll continue purchasing firearms and pointing out the threat of confiscation, you continue life as a marked cuckold.
So they're still not coming for any guns.
If only you had a gun.....
Spare me. You are refusing to admit they are trying? I consider trying as coming after.
Who should I have shot?
Take your pick.
how many of your guns that you currently possess would this bill take from you?
yeah, murder and/or suicide just ain't my thing.Take your pick.
pardon moi.
The bill proposed I just posted today from New York (if I lived there) would have made most of my guns illegal, meaning confiscation. The rest that were legal would be useless since all of the magazines would also be illegal, meaning confiscation.
And you should have a right to own assault weapons because.....?
Any weapon could be used for assault so I find the question silly. But to humor you, I have the right to own an assault weapon because it was granted to by the country's founding fathers. Why are such a when it comes to firearms? Did Daryl hold a gun to your head and make watch Jamal plow your wife? People need to stop projecting their fear of guns on to others and instead start holding those accountable that are committing the crimes, leave the law abiding citizens alone.
” Assault weapons” was on the top of the list that you posted.
why are you making this about me? Not my fault your thread is failing miserably.But to humor you, I have the right to own an assault weapon because it was granted to by the country's founding fathers. Why are such a when it comes to firearms? Did Daryl hold a gun to your head and make watch Jamal plow your wife? People need to stop projecting their fear of guns on to others and instead start holding those accountable that are committing the crimes, leave the law abiding citizens alone.
Do I have the right to bear nuclear arms?
did you even read the rest of what was proposed in New York? Not only would my rifles have been illegal, my shotguns would have been as well. My handguns would be useless since the magazine size is too big. What's the point of a gun with no magazine? Do you think 5 round magazines are available for my handguns? And how so is my thread failing miserably? I just posted proof they were trying to confiscate, weren't you and chump running around constantly saying they'll never try and confiscate?
Spare me, You are refusing to admit you are moving the goalposts again? I consider citing some yahoo in upstate New York as moving the goalposts.
Thread: "to those who say they weren't coming after our guns"
Legislator: "we want to confiscate guns"
TSA: kicks, and its good.
That law didn't pass. And it's debatable it would've survived SCOTUS scrutiny. That's most likely the reason it didn't even get to a vote either. Same reason Feinstein proposed law won't pass.
Some people just want to be scared, I guess.
So 'they' are not coming for your guns...
lol "if I lived there"
If you lived there they still wouldn't be coming after your guns.
Meh.
Even if they were really coming to confiscate your weapons, why should john q citizen give a about you and your guns?
Because if they start taking away guns (rights), what's to stop them from taking other rights that john q citizen cares about?
john q citizen should move to gun free Chicago and tell me how a gun free city really is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
