Reply With Quote
You got that re stamina. You win!!
lol you poor guy
Including two guys who won multiple times. Saban And Meyer = The SEC during that run.
You got that re stamina. You win!!
lol you poor guy
Auburn was 20 seconds away from being the third. Maybe you need to see things from a different perspective... Name the conference you think was more dominant than the SEC and show me the stats to back that up.Including two guys who won multiple times. Saban And Meyer = The SEC during that run.
Also, USC's championship was vacated in 2004.
Dumbjohn how bout this scenario: (hypothetical of course)
In a ten year period....Texas wins 3 NC, Oklahoma wins 3 NC, Oklahoma St. wins 1, and TCU wins 1.
Are you honestly going to sit here and lie to me that you wouldn't call the Big 12 a "dominant" conference after that? Cause I sure as would....no matter which conference did it. ACC, SWAC, Pac-12, Conf-USA.....it doesn't matter.
Your National Championship doesn't count....cuz it wasn't coached by Saban or Meyer
"Not a single one combined. Oh wait, there are two"
It's unintentionally hilarious that everyone has to break things down for him like that. It's like he's a little kid having a conversation with grown men.
Texas fans don't concern themselves with what the conference does. It's all about Texas.
^great job answering his question, little buddy
The re says LOL Conference pride....then 10 minutes later says having conference pride is o.k.
smh...another dumbjohn gem.
2007-2010 "Omfg da SEC is so good"
2010-2011 "well really all da powah is located in the SEC west"
2011-present "well bammer is just the most dominant team in the most dominant of conferences"
Then this year.....
You can't sit there and tell me there isn't SEC bias when you s are moving up in polls for losing to each other. Fact of the matter is when the time came for you to actually have to prove yourself as championship material, all your little teams folded. You don't get to play each other or ty ass ND for the le anymore. You have to earn itPERIOD
Last edited by unleashbaynes; 01-04-2015 at 07:57 AM.
So "a/one" season where SEC teams have a bad bowl experience says it all.....right? Forget the fact all the other conferences have always had bowl seasons like that....right? Ask NFL scouts about the SEC.2007-2010 "Omfg da SEC is so good"
2010-2011 "well really all da powah is located in the SEC west"
2011-present "well bammer is just the most dominant team in the most dominant of conferences"
Then this year.....
You can't sit there and tell me there isn't SEC bias when you s are moving up in polls for losing to each other. Fact of the matter is when the time came for you to actually have to prove yourself as championship material, all your little teams folded. You don't get to play each other or ty ass ND for the le anymore. You have to earn itPERIOD
It works like this...
This season woke us all up, now if we see the same thing next season, ok, then we have something. Never go with...a/one...ok?
The Pac12 went 6-2 in the bowls, won the Heisman and will being playing in the le game, so they must be the best conference, right?
what the are you talking about?
You can be proud of your conference. Living vicariously through it is obsession.
Texas is a power. We don't brag about what other teams do.^great job answering his question, little buddy
Praying that the SEC loses every single game....like you...and showing up the second a SEC team loses...bumping every single anti-SEC thread is..............obsession.
What's the difference dumbjohn? Actually, you are more obsessed with the SEC than any SEC fan on this site. I bet you watch more SEC games than anyone...
Dumbjohn....I think I got a comparison that you'll even understand.
What's the best division in the NBA? It's the SouthWest division. You (a Rockets fan) and most people on this site (Spurs fans) can agree on this. Any other division is the incorrect answer to this simple question.
Now....why is the Southwest division the best? It's because you have multiple teams with championships. Dallas has 1, Houston has multiple championships, and the Spurs have multiple championships. Even the Grizzlies have made the WCF....and the Pelicans are a legitimate squad this year. When Miami made 4 straight Finals....and were the most "dominant" team in the NBA...their division wasn't considered the best. That's because you need multiple teams in the mix to make up a great division.
It's the same thing with the SEC. It was considered "dominant" because multiple teams won the NC.
Funny that Texas is a power with just one recent NC under their belt . Yet he has a problem with calling a conference that won seven in a row dominant.
BTW you are not even an alumnus. You are living vicariously through a big, powerful university that reached that status bc of its many alumni. You had nothing to do with it.
Turns out youre not all that different than the SEC fans you claim live vicariously through others.
I mock the SEC because everyone roots for each other, collectively as a group. Texas is a brand, no need to do that .
Texas is a power because of the money they bring in and the resources they have to get recruits. They will be a power no matter whether the rest of the conference does good or bad. You would probably fry your midget brain like eggs trying to understand that.Funny that Texas is a power with just one recent NC under their belt . Yet he has a problem with calling a conference that won seven in a row dominant.
Money and recruits dont make a football power, winning does little buddy. Also no reason to refer to Texas as 'we' when you had nothing to do with getting them to the level they're at. You're not an alumnus or student.
And to win, you need money and recruits. lol again.
If Texas is a power....then what does that make Arkansas?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
