worldnewsnetdaily: Stephen Hawking admits Intelligent Design Highly Probable

[spurraider21]

Didn't mouse just point out that abiogenesis is impossible? And...you cannot have evolution without it...WHATS TO EVOLVE?????????????

you can have evolution without abiogenesis, and you can have abiogenesis without evolution. you want a quick explanation?

Evolution without abiogenesis

evolution is the change of the genetic makeup of a population over time. now lets imagine a scenario without abiogenesis. no life from non-life. lets say life was planted on earth in the form of bacteria. as the conditions of the earth change, the bacteria will either die, or adapt to these changes. if it dies, it dies. if not, it has undergone evolution

abiogenesis without evolution

so lets assume we had life come from non-life. we had the "primordial ooze" full of amino acids and other organic molecules. these undergo constatn reactions over thousands, millions, and billions of years, forming newer and more complex compounds along the way. one of the compounds has a specific structure and protein composition which allows a a reproduction of the molecule. this is your abiogenesis, the life from non-life. if this reproductive/replication process does't have mutation, each subsequent replication is exactly the same as the one before.

if there are no changes in the genetic code, there is no evolution. you just have the same organism duplicating itself without change.

[spurraider21]

99%...???

at least

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+percent+of...e+in+evolution

[Avante]

you can have evolution without abiogenesis, and you can have abiogenesis without evolution. you want a quick explanation?

Evolution without abiogenesis

evolution is the change of the genetic makeup of a population over time. now lets imagine a scenario without abiogenesis. no life from non-life. lets say life was planted on earth in the form of bacteria. as the conditions of the earth change, the bacteria will either die, or adapt to these changes. if it dies, it dies. if not, it has undergone evolution

abiogenesis without evolution

so lets assume we had life come from non-life. we had the "primordial ooze" full of amino acids and other organic molecules. these undergo constatn reactions over thousands, millions, and billions of years, forming newer and more complex compounds along the way. one of the compounds has a specific structure and protein composition which allows a a reproduction of the molecule. this is your abiogenesis, the life from non-life. if this reproductive/replication process does't have mutation, each subsequent replication is exactly the same as the one before.

if there are no changes in the genetic code, there is no evolution. you just have the same organism duplicating itself without change.

You're a funny little guy. If I post a video.article it's....blah blah....so what do you do? The same thing.

So what sort of life did we see at first?

[spurraider21]

You're a funny little guy. If I post a video.article it's....blah blah....so what do you do? The same thing.

So what sort of life did we see at first?

when you post a video/article, its usually created by some person who really has no understanding of basic science and biology. anybody who has a college dropout level education would be able to tell you what's wrong with them.

[Avante]

when you post a video/article, its usually created by some person who really has no understanding of basic science and biology. anybody who has a college dropout level education would be able to tell you what's wrong with them.

Kind of like telling me 99% of scientists believe in evolution and knowing how many times they have all been wrong, right?

You want that long list?

I'll try again...

So what was the first life on the planet? The one that got the ball rolling.

[ChumpDumper]

Why are you so afraid to see what those far more schooled in this than myself have to say? They all disagree with you as do I?

Where was this guy schooled?

Who is he?

Just too much of this out there..

[spurraider21]

Kind of like telling me 99% of scientists believe in evolution and knowing how many times they have all been wrong, right?

You want that long list?

I'll try again...

So what was the first life on the planet? The one that got the ball rolling.

at least i didnt make up the 99% thing. i looked it up first.

unlike you when you said 9/10 people dont believe in evolution

[RandomGuy]

You didn't. When pressed you finally said "they" (scientists) don't know. Then you made up your own answer.

So you don't really have a point that you can actually be bothered to lay out, when asked?

Or are you taking a page out of Avante's troll handbook, and just reposting the same stuff over and over regardless of what the response is?

Given how badly you seem to be doing at putting together a coherent logical thought, I can see why you might be hesitant to lay out something.