The OIG is taking an extremely long
smart move to downplay expectations tbh
you right wing assholes would SHRUG if the FBI was "mishandling" Trash's investigation in order to exonerate Trash.
But since your conspiracy is that FBI exonerated Hillary, you're outraged, and extending your outrageous conspiracies into one that says FBI is "mishandling" Trash's investigation to culpabilise him and his mafiya.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 05-17-2018 at 09:29 PM.
What are these expectations that you think need to be downplayed?
chuck ross maybe?
I don't know what this has to do with our previous exchange. This is a column being shared, not a "BREAKING NEWS" tweet with no backup. I have no questions about the validity of this tweet.
ask kimberly strassel. shes the one who is telling folks to manage expectations
And you said it was a smart move to downplay those expectations. What expectations were you referring to?
I’ve got $2000 out there what’s another 99,999 posts.
Expectations firmly downplayed.
I’ve got $2000 out there what’s another 99,999 posts.
LOL, NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING will happen from this report.
Avante will win a unanimous landslide during the next Blues/Track expert election before anything of real substance happens to Hildog or the Clinton Cartel. I would absolutely love to see something happen to her but I can't fool myself with false hope of a worthless report.
lol Avante reference
Well, the Clinton investigation was so rushed and unusual that I can see a couple criminal referrals coming out of the OIG.
No convictions though. Any jury is going to be lectured on how ed up everything was in 2016 -- and they will agree.
Keep telling yourself that.
What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?
What do you mean by 2016 being “ ed up”?
Why would something being “ ed up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?
It's not going to be as good as you want it to be.
That's what I said before. That's what I'm saying now.
can you put that on a scale of 1-10 pls
It's not going to be as good as you want it to be.
That's what I said before. That's what I'm saying now.
That’s wonderful but has nothing to do with my questions you so pussily dodges. Try again.
It's not going to be as good as you want it to be.
That's what I said before. That's what I'm saying now.
What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?
What do you mean by 2016 being “ ed up”?
Why would something being “ ed up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?
IT'S FLUID
Sorry, you're behind on answering questions.
Quit being a pussy and answer them.
Here's the big one.
Why did the Clinton campaign not use the Russia meeting after you claimed they set the whole thing up to frame team Trump?
I never claimed the Clinton campaign set up the meeting with the Russian lawyer. And there was nothing for her campaign to use from that meeting anyways.
“hey guyz the oppo research firm we hired set up a meeting with Don Jr and a Russian lawyer, btw that Russian lawyer works with the firm we hired for oppo research”
Stop being a and answer questions about statements you just made ITT.
What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?
What do you mean by 2016 being “ ed up”?
Why would something being “ ed up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?
Just an incredible coincidence.
Wait. What is your adoption meeting conspiracy then?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
