Tell me how my first mention on discovery to SR was misused. You can't because I used it right and now you're trying to blather your way out of it.
You signed up when you made the false claim. You can't back it up.
Because it's completely false and you couldn't prove it even if you weren't too chicken to try.Tell me why I won't tell you, princess.
Tell me how my first mention on discovery to SR was misused. You can't because I used it right and now you're trying to blather your way out of it.
I know you want to get caught up in your drama. Take true/false out of the equation; why am I not "backing up the claim". Can you get this, princess?
You did not.
You know you can't.
We agree there, then. Though I may have not fully recalled your argument correctly and argued some stuff that was not at issue.
.....
It has nothing to do with can or cannot. Why have I told you that I won't "back up the claim" in the past. Stop making this about your bitterness and supply the answer.
No, you did not use it correctly.
Ever.
I did "supply" the the answer.It has nothing to do with can or cannot. Why have I told you that I won't "back up the claim" in the past. Stop making this about your bitterness and supply the answer.
It's a false claim.
You can't back it up.
You know this so you just want to whine about it now.
Sorry, it's simply a false claim. It's bull . You got played by fake news.
lol
That would be a sufficient argument from your (jaded) p.o.v. if I had used "can't" and not "won't". Tell me why I won't do your bidding. Come out of your tantrum. Or you can simply say you don't know.
I just told you. You won't because you can't.
It's a false claim.
It proves you're completely full of .
Period.
So if I showed you a link that had the same info I purveyed (regardless of whether that fits your narrative) would it still be "can't"? I think we know who is "completely full of ".
There isn't one that isn't full of . That's why you can't actually back it up.
I can find a video of someone saying Cat Stevens' music is used to control minds. That doesn't mean it's true.
But you go right ahead and show us where you got your information.
lol
So, if you've already pre-judged the matter, there's really no need to get a link; but that wasn't exactly what I was getting at. So, you don't know after umpteen times telling you?
My 65-year old teacher in 1992 called and she wants the word "umpteen" back.
DMC called. He apparently is willing to take up stupid sh** with you. Have fun.
As long as you acknowledge you just gave up on your bull lie.
Okay, you're not interested in why I denied you; but you'll continue to throw your tantrums in the future when you get denied.![]()
"denied" me?
You abandoned your bull claim.
You're afraid to discuss it.
That's all.
More prejudgments and no interest in why your demands aren't getting filled.
If you don't want to abandon your claim then back it up.
Go right ahead.
Or leave it abandoned.
Your choice.
"abandoned" - More subjective language and cheap come-ons.
You know in advance that I'm not going to fulfill your link request; and it has nothing to do with all your phony pretenses. Tell me why or take the L.
Assume I have not prejudged. I’m willing to accept new facts as long as there is evidence to support it.
You still cant back up your claim.
Sad!
You can't even pretend to not prejudge. Gawd, you're dumb.
wow, 8 pages... I thought Trump s didn't care about McCain![]()
You can’t even pretend to back up your claim.
I know in advance you are full of and an idiot and a coward and that your claim is completely made up nonsense.
This is why you won't back up your claim.
It's not rocket science.
You have chosen the L. Par.
in advance at your future false pretenses instead of bothering to know the reason.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)