Reply With Quote
WAPO published her name and employer.
Apologist.
WAPO published her name and employer.
Not her address and phone number, dumbass. She went to the Post herself.
You will make any excuse in the world for your team.
Any excuse.
I will be surprised if she is not Anita-Hill'd
The Repug Rape Caucus and Repug/Christian misogyny will not be denied.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 09-17-2018 at 11:07 AM.
So did anyone call her?
Of course, whether or not she’s telling the truth doesn’t matter to the GOP, they’re the party of the pussy grabber. All that matters is forcing kavanaugh in.
"Mitch McConnell knew from day one that Brett Kavanaugh was going to be more trouble than he was worth,
and tried to tell Glorious Bleater so.
Now, McConnell and Trump are about to find out just how much more trouble he is, and
he may take Trump's entire first term down with him, either way."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
Has been for years, fwiw, imho, tbh...
He is not alone. I think having a black president screwed over a lot of racist heads and the shining lying white knight in orange completely sealed the deal. Cult city.
Timing of things like this should always be scrutinized.
We need to know exactly what people are willing to do for political purposes. Both sides are willing to ruin people’s lives for timing advantages, history has shown us this. We all do this to some extent. We hold back the big weapon just in case. It does not necessarily ruin a life, but it can be useful. Especially to out liars. You let them dig deeper and think they are getting away with it.
Did Avante really send her a pic?
Brett Kavanaugh's chief character witness thinks 'uncontrollable male passion' is 'awesome'
Mark Judge, the man who Christine Blasey Ford says was in the room when Brett Kavanaugh pinned her down, ...
first responded to the allegations by saying “I have no recollection of that,” a classic evasion if there ever was one.
Back in high school, Judge was
the kind of guy whose yearbook quote was about hitting women.
Not hitting on them. Hitting them.
Judge has also written a memoir about his heavy drinking in high school,
heavy drinking being completely consistent with Ford’s memory of Kavanaugh’s assault on her.
In fact, his memoir makes clear that he was a blackout drunk, so
“Mark Judge doesn’t remember something that someone says happened while he was drunk” is not much of a defense.
[his brother]:
"that’s the real problem—not alcoholism or a lousy childhood or an abusive father.
Mark is a solipsist: spoiled as a child, gazing always inward, unable to recognize any pain but his own.
He’s written about how, while no means no,
there’s also an “ambiguous middle ground” in which,
if a man “is any kind of man,
he’ll allow himself to feel the awesome power,
the wonderful beauty,
of uncontrollable male passion.”
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1796382
Meh, mostly attention s who want to play up their wild card reputations. They’ll fold eventually.
Kavanaugh lawyers up
Al Franken was forced to resign for far far less. Different rules for different parties.
Al Franken admitted some of his boob honking.
Brett has not.
It was a pic of him simulating a boob grab - not even grabbing them. There were other women who claimed he groped too. Trump has 20 women saying much much worse and nothing happens.
This K perv actually sexually assaulted the woman. Held her down, turned up the music, covered her mouth when she tried calling for help. He already went to the white house to get professional advice from the rapist in chief on how to flatly deny reality. Deny truth. Deny a crime is not really a crime.
S .
He didn't admit anything. He said that if the women he took said photos felt that way that he respects it and apologized for anything he might have done wrong that made them feel uncomfortable.
Totally different than saying yeah I grabbed pussy, my bad.
He also resigned after being piled on by his own party.
The difference here is that the GOP is still excusing attempted rape.
Franken's was confirmed with photographic evidence in some cases and more than one accuser, but I'd agree that he was a victim of the "cause." Kavanaugh has a mere allegation that is lodged with little evidence and is he said/she said. Obviously, we have to wait for all the facts to come out before we know for sure, but for what we have now, this case looks like a hit job by democrats to stop a nomination that was certain to happen.
If it comes down to a he said/she said, then how can you give more credence to the accuser just because she is accusing.
You have a picture of Franken air grabbing some s. You have nothing else.
We all suspect that Trump is a womanizer at least and who knows if he has done unwanted groping, but it wouldn't surprise anyone. The problem is that the American public knew that going in and still voted for him. Apparently, we have a lower standard for a president than the Supreme Court.
But to say K sexually assaulted a woman with no proof other than an allegation is nonsense. You have no reason to base your conclusion other than pure political bias. A person should be innocent until proven guilty and should have his day in hearing and hear his side before you make a conclusion. At least if you are being honest.
You have more evidence against Franken then anyone has against Kavanaugh. But that said, I think Franken got a raw deal. Even with multiple accusers and even if the allegations were true, I still think they should have at least let him run for the next term and let the people decide if the accusations were a reason for him to lose his job.You have a picture of Franken air grabbing some s. You have nothing else.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
