Reply With Quote
that is fair. the top 14 protected by definition out of the lottery picks might convey.
it's just all the lottery picks. such a distinction.
If you want there's another Chet lover who still seems to have a hard time admitting the facts, chandler Parsons on FanDuel with Mic e Beadle
that is fair. the top 14 protected by definition out of the lottery picks might convey.
it's just all the lottery picks. such a distinction.
Fascinating that you can forecast which future picks will be lottery picks. You should do something with that skill. Maybe couple it with your amazing goalpost moving skills.that is fair. the top 14 by definition out of the lottery picks might convey.
it's just all the lottery picks. such a distinction.
what is the lottery threshold and how does that relate to a top 15 protected pick? the question is rhetorical. you are being obtuse again. doing like including the Spurs native picks in your denominator while calling me bad faith.
getting a sense what your butthurt about.
Naz Reid would be perfect for this team. There were reports that the Spurs were trying to sign him in the offseason, but then decided not to, for whatever reason. He's one of the best 6th men in the league and is basically a starting caliber player who can play C and PF. He's mobile, a good 3-point shooter, has good handles and is only 24. With the T'Wolves in salary cap , the Spurs should try their best to bring him in and extend his contract. Ideal scenario is you frontload that contract like they did with Keldon and Vassell.
Trae Young, Naz Reid and Risacher would be a huge offseason. And you'd still have a whole lot of 2nds to trade for another 3-and-D wing.
One of the greatest rookie performances of all time won't win unanimous ROTY because gus like this just invented new criteria for the award out of their ass
There is only one pick that is top 14 projected, the pick that I already said is not likely to convey. The Spurs native picks goes in the denominator because those are actually picks, that the Spurs can actually use or trade. They are actually part of the war chest of assets. Trying to exclude those from your calculus is the ultimate in bad faith.
I didn't think you could take things to a next level of stupidity, but here we are. Congrats!
Let me save you the trouble of your typical reply:
I'm mad.
You are bored.
Now you can run and hide like you always do when your stupid bull gets called out.
chandler parsons throwing shade at devin for his contract is full of irony.
There are swaps too. When you include our picks and the swaps you are obviously trying to inflate the numbers.
Other than that, your basically saying the Bulls pick that is top 10 protected will convey. Wow, we sure have a lot left after trading away the 2 maybe as many as 4 other top 10 picks we acquired when you include the swap in the deal. But yeah that is not 'all in.'
That is what I was getting at when it was more appropriately viewed as the hopes of one who covets.
Remember when I was describing your behavior as petulant before?
This doesn't have to explained to you, because I know you know better, but you like to play these games of opaqueness for whatever weird fetish reasons that are known only to you. But for the abundance of clarity:
"All-in" has a clue, right in the name: ALL.
The Spurs have 15 FRPs and Swaps (which I specified from the get-go), only one of which (CHA) is more than likely to not convey at this point. This isn't word games, it's a fact.
The Bulls pick protection drops from 1-10 to 1-8 in 2026 and 2027 and as of right now is more likely than not to convey. It might not, I'm not making any predictions. Of the trade proposal you responded to, there would only be one top-ten pick at the time of the trade: TORs (unless it does not convey and you are trading it away, in which case, there are no top-ten picks included). You may THINK they are top-ten picks. They may even be LIKELY to be top-ten picks, but they are not top-picks until the lotto balls are drawn and they are placed there.
I don't even have an opinion on the trade proposal that was shared, I just take exception to your clearly incorrect take that it would represent the Spurs going "all-in". When using the term "all-in", it does not mean "most of some" - it means ALL... as in the team has put ALL it has into those moves to reach their goal (a championship, for most teams). You're by definition not going "all-in" by trading away a fraction of your available assets.
Now, this conversation truly has bored me.
So you fixated on a meaningless point of fact. Bravo.
It's doubly funny as I had conceded the point already earlier. You shouldve been bored then.
Looking at how Wemby responds to a challenge and especially how he goes at Chet, if Chet were to win the ROTY?One of the greatest rookie performances of all time won't win unanimous ROTY because gus like this just invented new criteria for the award out of their ass
Angry Wemby could be a total monster next year. Like Godzilla on cardboard buildings.
So you are taking umbrage over what I said to another account? Okay. Am I supposed to feel chagrined now?
I don't care how you feel. You're a bad faith, petulant poster who turns around and accuses everyone else of being the same. Contrary to your inflated sense of self-worth, this doesn't make me (or anyone else) mad, you just are what you are.
yeah you definitely seem zen. still not chagrined btw.
chagrinedthe return of platform of bluster
Every media member knows Spurs need to make a splash this offseason. Spurs need to make a move on Trae. Perfect target.
Figure out how to make KJ, Collins, and their picks back work.
Yea I'm sure that's the problem. All these superstars besides Wemby on our team, we don't know who to get rid of
Throw in Branham and the numbers workYea I'm sure that's the problem. All these superstars besides Wemby on our team, we don't know who to get rid of
KJ, Brahman/Devonte, and picks
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions