Reply With Quote
If that action is possible, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
Goldberg is s , a declared enemy of the President and thus fair game. Run him thru the ter as deep as possible.
Trumplandia could pivot to charging Jeffrey Goldberg under the Espionage Act for their screwup
Don’t forget that the Espionage Act makes no mention of “classified” information. It’s national defense information (NDI) which could cause harm to the U.S. if disclosed. Which it clearly was in this case, regardless of classification (and why JG could still be prosecuted)
If that action is possible, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
Goldberg is s , a declared enemy of the President and thus fair game. Run him thru the ter as deep as possible.
yeah, it's Goldberg's fault
Pete Hegseth caught - on video! - giving away war plans
Just putting our service members at risk smh. These guys are noobs.yeah, it's Goldberg's fault
JD Vance is such a fraud! I hate when fake Christians say they're going to pray for somebody. Dont say it, just do it.
Belt to ass on Maga is still in effect until one of these incompetent dweebs get fired.
¿8 Requests & Invites">
Larry Johnson thinks Goldberg ought to have published the story before the attack, tipping off the Houthis
The Vance account then goes on to make a noteworthy statement, considering that the vice president has not deviated publicly from Trump’s position on virtually any issue. “I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now. There’s a further risk that we see a moderate to severe e in oil prices. I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself. But there is a strong argument for delaying this a month, doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where the economy is, etc.”
The account identified as “JD Vance” addressed a message at 8:45 to @Pete Hegseth: “if you think we should do it let’s go. I just hate bailing Europe out again.”
“I will say a prayer for victory,” Vance wrote. . . .
Hegseth’s counter to Vance’s concern that the American public won’t understand why were bombing the out of another faraway country is this:
“Nobody [in America] knows who the Houthis are, so [we can just say] Biden failed and Iran funded them.”https://sonar21.com/it-wasnt-a-leak-...arlie-foxtrot/Well, guess what, boys and girls? Trump failed, just like Biden. The bombings over the last nine days have not deterred the Houthis from renewing their attacks on ships and Israel. And it has put US naval vessels in harm’s way without a good reason. Hegseth gives the game away… this is about blaming Iran.
and what's more neocon than attacking Iran
"real men go to Tehran"
some of the Twitterati think Whiskyleaks could be 5-D strategery
preparation for war with Iran
https://x.com/imetatronink/status/1904280162952265816I've just read some of the details of the "chat room leak" of a discussion between Trump admin principals regarding strikes in Yemen.
The chat participants want to frame US operations in Yemen as primarily serving European interests, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth emphasizing that point in a complaining tone.
In my view, this is deliberate misdirection. It is US interests that are being served here.
As I have noted several times in recent weeks and months, in order for the US to make war against Iran, the passage from the Red Sea to Kuwait must be secured for US seaborne logistics. THAT is the true objective of these air strikes against Yemen: to disarm Ansarullah so US sealift ships can safely pass through the Bab el-Mandeb.And yet, despite several days of relentless bombing, CSG-8 (USS Trembling Puppy) is still hiding out in the northern reaches of the Red Sea, well out-of-range of Yemeni missiles. So apparently they have yet to degrade Yemeni capabilities to the point where they dare to risk a transit of the southern Red Sea and the Gate of Lamentation.
Sen. Kelly: Was there any mention, Miss Gabbard, of a weapon or weapons system?
Director Gabbard: I don’t recall specific weapons systems being named.
they were doing this routinely
btw, maybe armed forces vets can speak to this, are launch times classified?
Trump is gonna blow a gasket
did someone declassify it after the Signal group chat?
Maga is dumb asf lol
the hits keep coming
Tulsi Gabbard, testifying before the House, now admits she was on the Signal chat while “traveling through the Asia Pacific region” but she doesn’t remember which country.
"I shirked the work meeting about the US attack on Yemen and didn't review the transcript until today"
Gabbard: "My answer yesterday was based on my recollection or the lack thereof of the details that were posted there. What was shared today reflects the fact that I was not directly involved with that part of the Signal chat."
HIMES: Information providing indication or advance warning that the US is preparing an attack should be classified as top secret. Do you disagree with that?
GABBARD: I don't disagree with that.
Gabbard's not very good at this
REED: Were you oversees during any part of these discussions?
GABBARD: Yes I was
REED: Were you using your private phone or public phone for Signal?
GABBARD: I won't speak to this because it's under review
REED: What is under review? It's a very simple question
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
