I think Heīll let the spurs FO take that loan to buy his contract out.
Itīll worth the effort of the monthly payments(like a brand new car)
or he could do what most players do when they come over - take out a loan and make payments, pay the rest off when they get their second, bigger contract.
I think Heīll let the spurs FO take that loan to buy his contract out.
Itīll worth the effort of the monthly payments(like a brand new car)
spurs can only pay a limited amount of the buyout, this has been discussed repeatedly before. it's under $500k what they can contribute towards it, but chump or bruno could tell you the exact figure. do you have any idea what you're talking about?
but,are you considering that Horry is retiring at the end of the season?+If they sign Scola they wonīt need Ely ,who costs another 3M p/year.
Yeah, it would be totally worth having Scola's contract voided, losing his rights and draft picks for a few years for cir venting the collective bargaining agreement. You should work for the Timberwolves.
iīd just switch scola for Ely(if Ely donīt meet the expectations this year)
Says who?
And even if he does cost $3 million, the Spurs won't need to use exception money to sign him.
I already have a good job.So no thanks
Giving a cursory look at the draft, I would be more inclined to use the exception money to secure a point guard or swingman. There looks like there is alot of big man talent in the draft. Conditions could certainly change.
I donīt think Ely will meet the spurs expectations.He never showed nothing to the Clipps or the Bobcats.
bottom line is there are some well-reasoned takes on why Scola shouldn't be signed, such as whether his game will translate to the NBA, whether the Spurs have bigger priorities, Scola's at ude towards the Spurs FO and vice-versa, etc . . . all quite reasonable.
But if someone thinks Scola can help the Spurs win (as I do), then signing him for cheap (relative to the average NBA salary) as he's allegedly been willing to sign for makes sense.
Other nonsense about making him the highest paid 2nd rounder in history or whether he gets more than Manu got in 02 and other crap is just trivial bull . If that kind of stuff mattered than the Spurs should have never signed Ginobili to a deal that was worth so many times more than George Gervin's in the 80's, after all, you can't pay a guard more than Gervin if he's never led the league in scoring! None of that is worth taking into consideration. All that matters is whether he will be a net plus at a partial-MLE price. The Spurs should be trying to compete and win a le not win the Sporting News fantasy challenge game using a salary index.
If the Spurs think Scola can help with his scoring, hustle, etc . . . the Spurs should sign him for the 3/9-10 he's asking.
If they think he's too small/slow/weak/ill-tempered . . . then they shouldn't sign him and should leave him to tool around Spain or trade his rights, doesn't matter which in the end.
I don't think Scola will meet your expectations. He never came close to the rebounding production you have predicted for him for any team.
I couldnīt agree more.
And If the spurs feel like he is not needed,just trade him or let him go.He actually trusted the spurs FO when he got drafted,and the spurs FO knew that He had a big and large contract back them when they acquired his NBA rights.
Yeah,US team thought the same when they played Arg,and them got busted.Good point chump.
i don't think that comment could be less germane to the discussion.
Iīm just giving the guy some credit.
And I didnīt metion that he guarded Dirk better tham any NBA player.
They didn't know exactly how big it was going to be or for how long.
The US thought he wouldn't rebound at a rate of 20 per 48 minutes?
Did he rebound at a rate of 20 per 48 minutes? Or 17 per 40 minutes?
So ,you wanna make me belive that the San Antionio Spurs Organization didnīt know how big or large was the contract of a player that theyīve been watching for at least 1 year,before he got drafted????
Come on Chump.
nope,he just owned a guy called Oīniel.thatīs all he did,and whas enough to beat them.of course +Manu+Nocioni etc ect
Yeah.So ,you wanna make me belive that the San Antionio Spurs Organization didnīt know how big or large was the contract of a player that theyīve been watching for at least 1 year,before he got drafted????
The NBA buyout in Scola's initial contract with Tau was a staggering 12 million euros or $14.5million. The team later revised the contract to give Scola a much more affordable buyout based on where he was drafted in the first round. Yet because the deal never specified anything about being selected in the second round, Tau officials claim Scola must pay the original buyout if he wants to leave for the NBA or wait until his contract expires in three years when the buyout is reduced to $1 million.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/b....6c5ecb8d.html
And:
Luis Scola will spend at least one more season with his team in Spain, according to a report in Lanacion.com of Argentina.
Scola, a member of the Argentina Olympic team, was picked by the Spurs in the 2002 draft. His team in Spain wants $4 million to buy out his current contract, according to Joe Reinagel of KENS 5 Eyewitness News.
http://blogs.mysanantonio.com/weblog..._scola_wo.html
So it looks like the terms of his buyout have changed at least a couple of time since he has been drafted.
You didn't say that.
ok,so they knew the buy out was big,we agree on that?
The thing was that the had this agreement back in 2002 that theyīd just let him go to the NBA for a Millon bucks buyout.
So,why didnīt the spurs bring him in back them?
They waited and Now TAU knows Itīll be hard to replace him.
And the contract never changed,the buyout did,but thatīs just a market price.The guy has developed his game since 2002 till now.hasnīt he?
So how does Scola compare to Ginobili,Nocioni, and Delfino.
Ginobili>Nocioni>Scola>Delfino
or
Ginobili>Nocioni>Delfino>Scola
iīd say
Ginobili=Scola=Nocioni>Delfino(But he is still young)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)