Reply With Quote
Once upon a time you were my favorite political forum poster . . .
Just
Once upon a time you were my favorite political forum poster . . .
Yeah, in a land, far, far away.
Once upon a time i'd waste my time in a thread like this when it deserved nothing more than a laugh.
Hey has the old demolition worker confessed yet? I wished he
would hurry up so we cold end this discussion.
The Nazi Holocaust was legal, why can't 9/11.
Cheney killed 3000 people, Hitler killed 6 million. That makes Hitler 3000 times worse than Cheney and clearly insane.
The controlled demolitions minimized property damage. If the Towers had fallen over onto other buildings, there would have been much more property damage.
Also, the Pentagon was struck in an area specially reinforced to take a plane crash hit, reducing damage quite a bit.
Nothing of real historical value was hit, like the Washington Monument, Statue of Liberty, or Gateway arch in St. Louis.
Casualties on 9/11 were minimized in many ways:
The WTC was hit early in the morning befoer it was filled up with people.
The first hit was the 95th floor, only trapping a small fraction of people.
They waited 17 minutes before hitting the 2nd tower, so most people could get out. And they hit high up on the 80th floor so fewer people were trapped.
They waited an hour before the 1st controlled demoltion, so more people could get out.
They waited another 1/2 hour before the 2nd controlled demolition, so even more people could get out.
The controlled demolition prevented the WTC from falling onto other people and killing them.
WTC 7 was not blown up until it was evacuated and people were removed from the immediate area.
The 4 hijacked flights were only 20% to 50% filled up, so less people died on the planes.
The Pentagon was hit in an area under renovation, so it was lightly populated and fewer people were killed.
FL93 was shot down over an open field, so no one was hurt on the ground, nor was there any property damage.
The hijacked planes could have hit a nuclear power plant, killing way more people.
These terrorists were domestic terrorists. Most terrorists would not be so kind as to spare so many lives to acieve their poltical goals.
Manny prefers to stick his head in the sand and blindly trust the government.....
Galileo, you are one sick puppy if you believe that crap.
A laugh?
Ths thread deserves an infinite number of laughs . . .
But once upon a time you'd used to post in the threads that deserved posting. But not anymore.
Oh well, after that side bar, back to the topic of this thread . . .
You're wasting your time now...
The Gateway Arch has historical value?
this thread is like heros season 2
"Minimized."
I'd make a whole page of
Are you capable of rational analysis, or just insults?"Minimized."
I'd make a whole page of
Of course I'm capable of rational analysis.
You on the other hand, are delusional.
What would even be the purpose of minimizing casualties?
Hey Galileo, I have a bicycle I would like to sell you, you
interested.
In military operations, one consideration is the number of casualties. The US operatives who pulled off 9/11 did not want to kill any more Ameriacns than they absolutely had to, in order to achieve their goals.
Why not?
"did not want to kill any more Ameriacns than they absolutely had to"
WTF? How is that possibly knowable?
Had the murderers scheduled better and flown lower (neighboring buildings permitting), they could have hit the towers lower and killed many, many more of the 50K people who worked there.
Why really did 9/11 Happen?
You don't know Al? it was global warming and Bush
caused it all.
But it doesn't surprise me you don't know. Good thing
your daddy left you all that money.
The planes were not piloted by hijackers.
They were on auto-pilot and flown into specified places. The first plane hit the 95th floor, to reduce casualties. It had to hit low enough, though, to make it seem plausible that the top 15 floors of the building could crush the bottom 95 floors when they did the controlled demolition.
Remember, 9/11 was an inside job.
The planes were not piloted by hijackers.
They were on auto-pilot and flown into specified places. The first plane hit the 95th floor, to reduce casualties. It had to hit low enough, though, to make it seem plausible that the top 15 floors of the building could crush the bottom 95 floors when they did the controlled demolition.
Why bring the buildings down at all then? That would have really minimized casualties.
A military mission and an inside job are two very different things. You really need to make up your mind about which tin foil hat you are going to wear.Remember, 9/11 was an inside job.
I thought you were bad Chump. This guy has absolutely lost it!
Why bring the buildings down at all then? That would have really minimized casualties.
A military mission and an inside job are two very different things. You really need to make up your mind about which tin foil hat you are going to wear.
Why is it people who don't agree with chump have to either wear foil caps or are mentally ill? Maybe Bush's plan did work after all
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
