Reply With Quote
So he made 17 FTs, but you discounted all of them to point out about half of them were not deserved? How does that work? How many times can you answer the same exact questions incorrectly?
According to you? Apparently, he did, he got 20 FTs
Oh viewer of a parallel universe, please reveal to me the secrets of other things that were meant to happen but never did!
Antonio Davis was an all-star nonetheless. He was a good interior defender, fierce rebounder and decent interior scorer. Guess why he made the all-star team by “default”? Oh right, it was because the other East centers were even worse! Now guess what teams they had to go through to get to the ECSF? Oh, East teams!
Oakley was this year’s Horry? Were you even watching the 01 Raptors? I was, I watched lots and lots of Raptors game back then, and Oakley was integral to their success. He provided a fire under their ass, strong interior defense, mid-range shooting and great rebounding. Now look at the stats, he averaged 35.5 mpg, 9.5 rpg, and 9.6 ppg.
Alvin Williams was a steady floor general before he was hobbled. No he wasn’t an all-star by any stretch of imagination, but he was intelligent with the ball, ran the offense well and played decent defense.
And Chris Childs? What the are you talking about, he was NOT the starting PG on the team, he played 26 games with the Raptors that season, averaging only 21.2 mpg. Their lineup that year was Williams at PG, Carter, Mo Pete, Oakley and Davis.
Anywhere where I said Mashburn was NOT a top 25 player? But guess what? There were 29 teams back then! So he was the best player on a middle-of-the-pack team, that would basically put him in the top 25 by definition. That team was not as talented as noted on paper. Wesley was an OK player, Baron Davis was not the Davis of today (crazy chucker, not that intelligent on the court, oh wait, the whole team were crazy chuckers back then). PJ Brown was basically the Oakley of Charlotte, etc ….
Learn to understand the use of quotation marks to express sarcasm. Ever heard of Quote-unquotes? As in, “TheAuthority has quote-unquote arguments”.
Those were YOUR arguments, YOU came up with looking at 3pt shots as the sole evaluator of contribution, and ignored things such as ball movement and defense when comparing Horry to Bonner. Oh wait, you just failed to see the similarity in comparing Baron Davis to Daniel Gibson and comparing Horry to Bonner was to show how idiotic your original comparison was, nevermind.
Videos please.
Perhaps that got you enraged.
What explanation? Those add-on criteria? You specifically said shooting 35% on 3s were terrible, regardless of situations, then you start to tack on new criteria.
Look at PER.
Again, you came up with the criteria that Horry was a coatrider because he was a 9-point per gamer. YOU continue to come up with terrible examples of why Horry was not valuable to any of the le teams he was on, and I came up with obvious examples to dispute your claims.
If you were to argue and say that examples were terrible, learn to read your original arguments and reasons for refute.
, you really are dumber than I thought, and that is saying a lot. The court is 94 by 50, Horry just so happens to be at the correct spot multiple times and nail down clutch shot after clutch shot.
Again, simply looking at PPG as some kind of gauge, while ignoring facts that Horry was a matchup nightmare for the opposition. Put a small guy on him, and he can shoot over you, put a big guy on him, and he will drive right past. Ever wonder how he could put up 35 mpg on a championship team in the playoffs? Ever wonder why Phoenix would trade Barkley for Horry and Cassell? Horry destroyed Rodman in the 95 playoffs.
John Stockton has a career average of 13.1 ppg, Stephon Marbury is at 20.7 ppg.
Marbury > Stockton.
So is Steve Francis.
And both Francis and Marbury > Parker.
