ROFLROFL
i didn't realize you thought i was so poor i never use cell phones, email, and i guess you assumed i was blogging each day all day from a public library, i didn't realize these things
CR()\/\/NDD
You say you don't give a but i bait you into giving a blatantly overworded hegamboaesque response
CR()\/\/NDDDDDDDD I saiddd
ohh the bank was American??Again, you know about me and my life, and you talk out of you arse once again.
I was hired by an AMERICAN bank, which transfered me from Argentina to the US because they could not find Americans who could do my job as well as I did it.I did not take advantage of anybody. The bank (Chase Manhattan Bank) made a lot of money out of me. And they paid me a market salary in return. And I paid taxes like anybody who lives in America. Lots of taxes.
So shut the up, for once in your sorry life.
smeagol you recently said it was Americas responsibility to globalize the earth
I was expecting you to find that cbf piece of internets art funny
So?ohh the bank was American??
smeagol you recently said it was Americas responsibility to globalize the earth
How is that related to Chase Manhattan Bank (aka JPMorgan Chase) doing business in Argentina and hiring me?
Ron Paul has a great chance to win. If the polls were not rigged, he would be leading in the polls right now. He's already leading in money raised, has the best organization, and has the srongest message.
To get a good idea how rigged the polls are, please check this out:
A Rigged Poll Deconstructed
www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/lindgren2.html
Turns out, you should have saved your money. Since he is running again... Bump.
he's the only one that has a chance.
I dont agree.
I think Romney and Perry have a chance to beat Obama in November 2012.
I know Bachmann is a ing joke.
I know Paul will not win the Rep nomination based solely on his position with the use of America's military.
Lets pretend Paul did win the Rep nomination (not going to happen), I sincerely doubt he beats Obama in November.
I hope he would, he would have my vote, but I tend to agree with a lot of the coverage that says he is much too...out of step with your typical American voter. A candidate like Ron Paul would probably win a future Presidential election, but not this one, not today.
just isnt bad enough yet for Americans to really take stock in the political process.
oh yeah forgot about Romney. all these GOP candidates have huge blatant flaws. and it's not even election yet.
agree on whoever said this rep primaries are must see tv. It's like that show Survivor
huh? Paul's stance with the military is the reason why he's actually in the race now.
Romney and Paul have a fairly good shot at beating Obama.
Rick Perry is the flavor of the week. Once more info about him comes out he'll fade into oblivion.
I think so. and it's funny when idiots say "he's never lost a race". he's ran what, 3 races?
...with the support of an extremely low percentage of the population that just-so-happens to be very politically active.
You have to think "Can Paul win the general election?"
I, personally, hope that the answer is yes.
But my brain knows the answer.
i really like what i see with Ron Paul. i think he's spot on in his views on abortion and military policy. i would probably vote for him.
i don't trust Romney. he's a known flip-flopper, and i was reading his wiki page the other day that i didn't like: the dude helped stage a protest against a group of an anti-war protesters at his school in like '69. that same year he takes off to France for like 2 years in the guise of Morman missionary work. my ass. i understand a lot of people did whatever they could to dodge the the draft, but to organize a demonstration against anti-war protesters and then dodge the draft is very lame.
i guess we'll be finding out more about perry in the coming months. don't have much of an opinion on him yet.
Cosmored?
Dont pretend to know anything about my media habits. Paul would never win a general election, certainly not against Obama.
That isnt media talking, thats me.
Ron Paul will never win. It's not because his ideas are so fruity, but because he would have a 4 year lame duck Presidency. He could never get any of his wild notions to pass.
You should get all your accountant thug s together and harrass and force people to vote for Ron Paul at the primary's like the Black Panther Party does.
I like some of Ron's ideas, but neither side of the isle will ever support his uncommon ideals, mostly because it will cost them money as individuals. They are all banking from some pork barrel rider bill they tacked on for their district, or some "you scratch my back" agreement. Ron Paul's platform is too aggressive, too unrealistic.
He's had staunch supporters for years, and every election you see them on message boards but most voters don't get onto the forum, and many don't get onto the internet. No one knows who Ron Paul is, and his biggest detractor, by far (sucks I know) is the fact he doesn't have a nice head of hair.
This isn't the first time he has had all the cheers, even the past repub. debates he's had the most cheers and people behind him in the studio.
I disagree though that he can't pass his own legislation in a divided congress/senate. If he's selected as the republican candidate and he's elected, the repub's will fall inline and back their candidate. No dem or repub is going to let their leader hang.
I think he could pull it off this time. Still, I wouldn't bet on it either.
I will vote for him but what we really need is a DeLorean so we can kidnap Paul from 1985
Ron Paul On Hurricane Irene: Response Should Be Like It Was In 1900
“We should be like 1900, we should be like 1940 1950 1960,” he said. “I live on the gulf coast, we deal with hurricanes all the time.” Of course, the Gulf Coast deals sometimes deals with them less welle thanks to a botched national response. Paul, who has called for abolishing FEMA, dismissed the organization to Kent because it is “a great contribution to deficit financing.”
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/20...ne-irene-1900/
How many Federal $100Ms did TX receive for Ike, etc? I'm sure Paul's cons uents would love their district to be wiped clean like Ike on High Island and left on their own to rebuil it.
People who follow politics know who Ron Paul is. The average voter has no ing idea what Ron Paul stands for, because Ron Paul doesn't have a generic platform like the biparty system that always wins.
The overwhelming majority of voters are ignorant as . Ron Paul does not appeal to that demographic any more than Ralph Nader did. , Ross Perot had a better chance before he wigged out and quit.
Fox News would throw a fit if he won.
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzRon Paul On Hurricane Irene: Response Should Be Like It Was In 1900
“We should be like 1900, we should be like 1940 1950 1960,” he said. “I live on the gulf coast, we deal with hurricanes all the time.” Of course, the Gulf Coast deals sometimes deals with them less welle thanks to a botched national response. Paul, who has called for abolishing FEMA, dismissed the organization to Kent because it is “a great contribution to deficit financing.”
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/20...ne-irene-1900/
How many Federal $100Ms did TX receive for Ike, etc? I'm sure Paul's cons uents would love their district to be wiped clean like Ike on High Island and left on their own to rebuil it.
It's not sudoku.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
