Reply With Quote
Lolololol
”dirty,filthy, disgusting word”
A major development in Roger Stone’s case may explain why Mueller is finally resigning
a former Mueller prosecutor, Aaron Zelinsky, revealed in court Wednesday that a witness tied to Roger Stone has finally agreed to testify before the grand jury.
Stone is currently awaiting trial for the charges Mueller brought against him, which include lying to Congress, obstructing justice and intimidating a witness in the course of the Russia investigation.
But there have been hints that there may be
other charges looming over Stone, the most prominent hint being Mueller’s effort to get his associate, Andrew Miller, to testify before the grand jury.
Miller had long refused to testify, and he was held in contempt by Judge Beryl Howell for his refusal, but he has been appealing the decision.
Now, it was revealed in court, Miller has agreed to testify on Friday.
This suggests, though it is far from certain, that new charges might be coming against Stone.
Zelinsky spoke privately with the judge on Wednesday to explain why Miller’s testimony was still needed.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/a-major-development-in-roger-stones-case-may-explain-why-mueller-is-finally-resigning/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=265
Lolololol
”dirty,filthy, disgusting word”
Flynn’s interactions with the Russians that were redacted should be released tomorrow
‘Freudian slip?’ The internet mocks Trump for tweeting his own confession that Russia helped him
President Donald Trump claimed a right to obstruct justice — and accidentally admitted that Russia helped get him elected.
The president spent Thursday morning raging about special counsel Robert Mueller,
who delivered his first public remarks about the Russia investigation the day before, and
insisted his apparent efforts to impede the probe were justified because he thought the case was unfair.
“Russia, Russia, Russia!” Trump tweeted. “That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax…And now Russia has disappeared because
I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.
It was a crime that didn’t exist.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/fre...8460&list_id=1
Trump pissed at Mueller
nope, impeach him with a huge Articles of Impeachment, as campaign strategy, and include, at very least, the years of lying and secret talks with mortal adversary Pootin, and believing Pootin "didn't do it" while calling USA IC Russian findings a hoax
Trash U fraud and Trash charity fraud are also grounds for impeachment.
the Articles of Impeachment could be, and should be, inclusive of all the absolute by Trash and his mafiya.
NONE of it has to be criminal, simply unfitting, unbecoming of the office of the President.
The Repug Senate can toxic slime itself by refusing to Trash, but that's also a Dem campaign tactic.
Guy reallly telling on himself
Andrew Johnson, Wlliam J. Clinton, Donald J. Trump.
"The closer to the election the better."
this takes time, start now, with LONG Articles of Impeachment, including the kitchen sink
"If he gets impeached and removed,"
Senate needs 2/3 to convict, ain't gonna happen, but impeachment is sufficient
If you had the option, would you prefer him step down & be replaced by Pence?
Trump as president. Cant still wrap my head around that beauty.
What a stupid mother er.
That's not true. Any impeachment that does not adhere to Cons utionality can be overturned by the Supreme Court.It's a little thing called checks and balances.
You're talking out of the place you like s in.
Then again, you never know what you're talking about, derp.
the chief justice of the supreme court presides over impeachment hearings. that's your check and balance.
I understand the concept.
I just think you're completely wrong.
Show your link saying an impeachment can be overturned by the Supreme Court. A black letter statute or SCOTUS decision would be best.
Tranny got too much s on the brain to make sense. Par.You're talking out of the place you like s in.
Then again, you never know what you're talking about, derp.
My contention is that the impeachment process is a power solely granted to Congress by the Cons ution and not subject to SCOTUS review.
Your contention is that the impeachment process is subject to SCOTUS review.
Prove it.
That'd be sufficient if his le was majesty of the courts.
And where does it say that it is not subject to judicial review?
Congress can impeach/convict anybody. The judicial branch is not involved
https://law.justia.com/cons ution/...eachments.html
and for any reason, say Congress didn't like odor emanating from Trash.
Nothing but on the tranny train, I've heard.
Let us know when you hit the end of the line so we can give the all clear to the kids.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
