Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[djohn2oo8]

So white guys stealing $10Ms should be ignored because law enforcement costs too much

[DarrinS]

He has a story to tell and he can’t wait to tell it, right?

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

[TSA]

look at this ing post. this is the window you look through to see this guys character.

you're a low life piece of .




you used to be entertaining, but in life, you suck hard.

There was no need for a special counsel. The FBI already had the crimes committed by Manafort/Gates years ago. The Russian troll farm was already known. The FBI should have continued handling both. Comey illegally leaked his memos to trigger a special counsel. Think about that.

[clambake]

There was no need for a special counsel. The FBI already had the crimes committed by Manafort/Gates years ago. The Russian troll farm was already known. The FBI should have continued handling both. Comey illegally leaked his memos to trigger a special counsel. Think about that.

just think, in a couple of years you can drag that kid into your low life

[TSA]

So white guys stealing $10Ms should be ignored because law enforcement costs too much

Why didn’t the Obama admin go after these same white guys when the FBI knew about it in 2013? Was it because these same white guys were working with the Podesta Group and Skadden Arps? Why did Tony Podesta suddenly shut down the Podesta Group recently? Why didn’t he shut it down in 2013 when Nanafort was under investigation?

[boutons_deux]

Manafort continued to consult for Trash after he was fired as campaign mgr

Gates should have plenty of dope on Manafort, plus on Manafort+Trash, probably forcing Manafort to a plea. Trash is screwed

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

Manafort continued to consult for Trash after he was fired as campaign mgr

Gates should have plenty of dope on Manafort, plus on Manafort+Trash, probably forcing Manafort to a plea. Trash is screwed

Yup. Gates would not be getting a deal if he didn't give info on errybody.

[djohn2oo8]

[Reck]

He has a story to tell and he can’t wait to tell it, right?

Darrins, how's your poker game? You seem like a good player.

You hide your fears well.

Just have one question for you. Why would Mueller need to keep throwing the book at those two when the first indictment was good enough to put them away for life.

Is Mueller just playing games with these two or does he have a plan to flip one or two? Which seems more likely?

The real question is..why would he need them to flip? To serve up who?

[TSA]

Darrins, how's your poker game? You seem like a good player.

You hide your fears well.

Just have one question for you. Why would Mueller need to keep throwing the book at those two when the first indictment was good enough to put them away for life.

Is Mueller just playing games with these two or does he have a plan to flip one or two? Which seems more likely?

The real question is..why would he need them to flip? To serve up who?

The Clintons. Study the indictments, look at the connections.

[Pavlov]

The Clintons. Study the indictments, look at the connections.

You didn't even know the indictments were numbered.

[Pavlov]

Question of the day -- if Mueller were to be investigating the president and his family while the president could fire him at any time, would it be a good idea to let the president and the public know what he is doing at all times?

Yes or no.

[djohn2oo8]

[Reck]

He's melting down hard.

[djohn2oo8]

[TSA]

You didn't even know the indictments were numbered.

You didn't even know the indictments never once mentioned Trump and Russian collusion.

[Reck]

You didn't even know the indictments never once mentioned Trump and Russian collusion.

You still haven't answer my question from a few days ago. Where in these indictments does it mention anything Clinton? I know you posted a twitter thread but let's go with actual facts that connect.

[Pavlov]

You didn't even know the indictments never once mentioned Trump and Russian collusion.

Still trying to move det goalpost.

Question: if Trump/Russia collusion is indeed a focus among many of the Mueller investigation, is it a good idea -- in your opinion -- to immediately make the earliest indictments from the Mueller investigation about Trump/Russia collusion?

Yes or no.

[boutons_deux]

You didn't even know the indictments never once mentioned Trump and Russian collusion.

Not yet.

Collusion, active or passive, money laundering, obstruction, A Hard Rain's Gonna Fall

[RandomGuy]

The real question is..why would he need them to flip? To serve up who?

The Clintons. Study the indictments, look at the connections.

Ok, ok, now that is a bet I will take. "Special prosecutor brings indictments of senior Trump campaign officials in order to go after Hillary Clinton"

, I'll pony up $1000. I'll look into putting up a security bond for it this weekend.

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]