Democrats Looking To Ramp Up The Fascism

[DMC]

You just questioned me and I answered, tough guy.

I never expected you to own up to anything.

Such a coward on an anonymous message board.....

You just admitted to being a phobe and you want to cast aspersions at me?

Yeah.. no.

[Pavlov]

You just admitted to being a phobe and you want to cast aspersions at me?

Yeah.. no.

I simply asked you a question.

If you didn't make any such insults there would be no aspersions to cast.

Have you ever made any such insults on this board?

Yes or no.

[DMC]

I simply asked you a question.

If you didn't make any such insults there would be no aspersions to cast.

Have you ever made any such insults on this board?

Yes or no.

You have no right to ask anyone that. Because you are an admitted phobe I refuse to answer your questions.

[Pavlov]

You have no right to ask anyone that. Because you are an admitted phobe I refuse to answer your questions.

So you're offended by such insults?

Seems like you'd have used the slur less than 300 times if you're so offended.

DenialMC

[DMC]

A code of conduct is a set of rules outlining the social norms, religious rules and responsibilities of, and or proper practices for, an individual. In its 2007 International Good Practice Guidance, "Defining and Developing an Effective Code of Conduct for Organizations", the International Federation of Accountants[1][better source needed] provided the following working definition:

Are these laws?

Since we were first discussion laws, then codes of conduct then back to laws again, which is being denied now?

A code of conduct isn't a law of conduct.

Ergo not all codes are laws

/Blake

[DMC]

So you're offended by such insults?

I am out of time. I could have spent another hour discussing this with you before I found out you're a phobe.

have fun keeping the crickets company

[Pavlov]

I am out of time. I could have spent another hour discussing this with you before I found out you're a phobe.

have fun keeping the crickets company

Just remember that the next time you use a sexual slur.

You sure hate the disabled for some reason.

[vy65]

If code and law are the same things, then all codes are laws.

Are all codes laws?

You came in right in the middle and grabbed a post and tried to make something of it. The discussion was about flag protocol code. Burning the flag is against that code, but it's not against the law.

Also

https://law.justia.com/codes/

Here is says "US Laws, Codes and Statutes"

Why would they use both Law and Codes if they mean the same thing?

Jesus Christ you’re digging the hole deeper. Do you know what the U.S. code (one of the links above) is a collection of?

I’ll give you a hint. 28 US Code Section 1442 is a _________ regarding removal to federal court.

[vy65]

The Texas Penal Code isn’t a set of laws either, I guess

[vy65]

Or the business and organizations code, or the business and commerce code, or the civil practice and remedies code. Texas really is a lawless place.

[DMC]

The Texas Penal Code isn’t a set of laws either, I guess

Is a law a set of codes?

[DMC]

Or the business and organizations code, or the business and commerce code, or the civil practice and remedies code. Texas really is a lawless place.

Are all codes sets of laws?

[Blake]

Lol dmc

[DMC]

Lol dmc

You still looking for a pizza delivery job?

[Blake]

You still looking for a pizza delivery job?

No, why? Are you hiring?

[vy65]

Are all codes sets of laws?

Is a law a set of codes?

Also

https://law.justia.com/codes/

Here is says "US Laws, Codes and Statutes"

Why would they use both Law and Codes if they mean the same thing?

The point you were trying to make here was that because the terms laws, codes, and statutes are different, they implicate different things. That's what you're trying to do with your inane logic questions about not all codes being laws.

What you're running away from is that justia link you provided uses codes/laws/statutes to mean the same thing. That's why you wouldn't answer my question about the removal statute - because you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar again.

[Winehole23]

DMC --> chain link fence --> corn cob

[Blake]

DMC --> chain link fence --> corn cob

Can you find a chain link fence surrounding corn cobs? Is a corn cob a chain link fence?

[Winehole23]

[Blake]

If that kid's name is Webster it would explain some things

[DMC]

The point you were trying to make here was that because the terms laws, codes, and statutes are different, they implicate different things. That's what you're trying to do with your inane logic questions about not all codes being laws.

What you're running away from is that justia link you provided uses codes/laws/statutes to mean the same thing. That's why you wouldn't answer my question about the removal statute - because you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar again.

You didn't answer the questions.

Just because something is a code doesn't mean that it is a law. Otherwise all codes should be laws.

Is a dress code a dress law? Is a dress code a set of dress laws?

[Blake]

You didn't answer the questions.

Just because something is a code doesn't mean that it is a law. Otherwise all codes should be laws.

Is a dress code a dress law? Is a dress code a set of dress laws?

All federal, state and local codes are law.

We're in a political forum, not a dress code forum.

[DMC]

All federal, state and local codes are law.

We're in a political forum, not a dress code forum.

We were discussing religious codes, Blake. Are religious codes laws?

[Blake]

We were discussing religious codes, Blake. Are religious codes laws?

If the people adopt the code as law, yes.

[vy65]

You didn't answer the questions.

Just because something is a code doesn't mean that it is a law. Otherwise all codes should be laws.

Is a dress code a dress law? Is a dress code a set of dress laws?

I didn't answer the questions because they were irrelevant to the point being made. I took no issue other than your example/justia link proving the exact opposite of inane point you were trying to make.