Mathurin and Sochan would be great.
Sochan as the top pick not so great.
Spurs need to do something to come out of this draft with an elite scoring prospect.
Whoa-- this is close to my current favs of Sochan at 9 and Jalen at 20, but with Jake LaRavia at 25 over Braun.
An interesting question, we think its likely the spurs will. Trade or sell a pick, my questionoes anyone have a strong preference ovef what picks get tossed?. 20 and 25 seem too close to keep both but. Historically the spurs draft well here. Maybe 9 gets a good offer. I know without being on the phones we can't debate trades.
Packaging 20/25 and even adding a player to move up seems logical to me.
EJ Liddell seems to be mocked a little too low atm. If the playoffs have shown us anything, players who can guard multiple positions (and with Liddell, it’s not inconceivable he can guard 1 - 5; he certainly thinks he can), even when they are not making shots are still extremely valuable.
If your comparison is a “more athletic Grant Williams”, you’d have to start garnering looks late lottery…
I've gone back and forth on this. But part of me thinks the Spurs generally don't outdo other teams with trades and free agent signings-- it's in the draft where they show an advantage over most of the league. So, maybe with that being the case, give the FO four shots at it and the odds are at least one is a big hit? But I can see the appeal of combining two and moving up too.
I agree as the draft is a crapshoot but I’d argue there is a recency bias that shows we've been average at best the last 4 drafts and multiple teams have been doing better in the draft.
I like taking 4 more swings which puts guys like Weiskamp, Vassell, Primo and Keldon on watch.
I don't see adding 4 -- 4! -- rookies. That's pretty nuts. Then it gets expensive because you have to start cutting players to make room.
While adding 4 rookies and having 4 swings at a home run sounds nice... it's just not realistic for this reason, and because we don't have (no one does) the infrastructure to develop 4 young guys simultaneous while still given attention to Primo & Vassell.
Teams that bring on multiple rookies at once (Houston, OKC) don't seem to ever get anywhere with them.
I get that. I just was a 4 with some size and some grit. I would love Murray if he fell, but Sochac is my preferred other option for the pick at 9.
Spurs have drafted very average the last four years.
Better to package the picks if possible to move up and get a more sure player with higher potential.
Quality is better than Quan y here.
This ain't no place for facts. Take that sh*t somewhere else.
The more you think about it, the nicer it sounds.
Wembanyama should be the target.
We will not be drafting Wembanyama. If that is your expectation, or even your hope, you WILL be disappointed.
I wouldn't have put that in blue font.
You never know. The Spurs can be really bad next year. They were healthy this year and still played to 14 games below .500.
And with some lottery luck get into that number 1 pick.
They got the number 1 pick this year in the rehearsal round so it can happen even with long odds.
Socahn, jalen williams, and Christian Braun are excellent choices, all of which are right in the spurs range....no reaching for potential but drafting solid picks.
If the FO actually trades Poeltl & Richardson, we'll likely find ourselves in the same situation we were in last season, probably worse. And although it will be highly unlikely, we did come up with the no. 1 pick recently, if only for a rehearsal... who's to say next time won't be when it counts?
If we keep Poeltl & Richardson and sign some veteran, then yes, that chance is gone.
Ex preaches the flattened odds of #1 but also doesn’t preach the flattened odds of getting #1.
I like this mock. A Duke and another SEC player in the top 20 is the safest bet for guys who are used to the limelight.
I looked at the top four picks since 2000 and every draft save for 2005 (Unless Marvin Williams is one) had a bust. 2019-2021 too early to tell but has some potential busts as well.
Meaning the Spurs getting into this lottery top 4 could’ve landed them a bust to continue the trend anyway. I know I’m reaching but gotta bright side this as much as you can
We still going to suck next year which Is OK we are not a good team but more playing time for the youngsters and still getting a top 7 draft pick next draft is all good.
We definitely need a player who can score, but if the Spurs decide to draft and bring in two maybe three players this year who are defensive forwards with upside, then I can live with that. If they can grab Sochan or Eason, and then later EJ Liddell or Kendall Brown, then I think that would be a success, at least from a positional sanity point of view. With the later picks I'm still intrigued by Beauchamp as role play and Hardy as possible scorer. A lot of players I've lost interest in knowing more about.
As for Hardy, here's a pitch for him as a scorer: https://youtu.be/OhkQ0-pS02k
Without a blockbuster trade to bring in a star or a jump up in the draft to get one of the top projects and even with that the Spurs will likely again be in the lottery next year.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)