Reply With Quote
Another brilliant Think Progress link, brought to you by our forum hatemonger... ShazBot!
Missouri state Senate is considering a bill that would require all first graders in the state to take a gun safety training course. Using a grant provided by the National Rifle Association, it would put a “National Rifle Association’s Eddie Eagle Gunsafe Program” instructor in every first grade classroom.
Sen. Dan Brown, R-Rolla, told the Senate General Laws Committee Tuesday that his bill was an effort to teach young children what to do if they come across an unsecured weapon.[...]
“I hate mandates as much as anyone,
Senators watched a brief segment of the training video during the hearing. The segment featured a cartoon eagle telling children to step away from an unsecured gun and immediately report it to an adult.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...t-grader-guns/
gun safety? 6 or so gun-fellators accidentally SHOT at GUN SHOWS!
When the answer to "who will think about the kids?" is the NRA, America is so ed.
Another brilliant Think Progress link, brought to you by our forum hatemonger... ShazBot!
Before I pretend to be outraged over yet another proposed bill that has zero shot at actually becoming law, we're sure this time that this is actually a current story, right?
LOL...
I didn't look.
Maybe another 2011 story?
whether they become law or not isn't the point. Just proposing insane and dog-whistling to bubbas ("all y'all paranoid locked-and-loaded bubbas ought to be even more pissed off that my insane got voted down") is indisputable proof how low, and venal, these Repug mofos will go,
Man, this is worse than that bill that would legalize killing doctors who perform abortions!
next republican bill will give 1st graders who have passed "gun safety 101" immunity from prosecution for killing abortion doctors
Whether or not it becomes law isn't the point to intellectually limited robots like yourself who just want pretend that every wingnut on the opposite political team is a perfect representation of everyone who disagrees with your team politically. To people who are actually capable of employing some critical thought, whether or not something becomes law is the entire point. If you're truly interested in whether or not an entire group of people supports something so that you can judge them, then you really do need to wait until that idea has progressed beyond the stage where only one person needs to be involved. It only takes one idiot to introduce a bill. It takes a bunch of idiots to make that bill into a law.
"every wingnut"
not talking about obese, pot-bellied, weird facial hair bubbas down at the shooting range
these aren't "every wingnut", these are elected STATE and FEDERAL representatives, and major "Christian" hate groups, spewing this , just like Akin "rape caucus". 1000s or 100Ks "patriots" elect these wing-nuts REPEATEDLY and they get funds from Kock Bros, Repug PACs, etc, etc.
you'd like to marginalize, ignore the very politicians as atypical fringe wingnuts who in fact represent the white, male, low-pay bubba, red-state, Confederate Repug base and DOMINATE the Repug party at state and federal level
Thanks for reinforcing my point."every wingnut"
not talking about obese, pot-bellied, weird facial hair bubbas down at the shooting range
these aren't "every wingnut", these are elected STATE and FEDERAL representatives, and major "Christian" hate groups, spewing this , just like Akin "rape caucus". 1000s or 100Ks "patriots" elect these wing-nuts REPEATEDLY and they get funds from Kock Bros, Repug PACs, etc, etc.
you'd like to marginalize, ignore the very politicians as atypical fringe wingnuts who in fact represent the white, male, low-pay bubba, red-state, Confederate Repug base and DOMINATE the Repug party at state and federal level
RSS can't contextualize. thinkprogess doesn't even have that word in it's dictionary.
Vitamin I...so very delicious.
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
...you're not curious about anything outside of your close-minded, benighted blind ideology.
that his bill was an effort to teach young children what to do if they come across an unsecured weapon.[...]
seems like a common sense idea...
Do you have a problem with the State wanting to use tax dollars to teach kids what to do if they come across an unsecured weapon?
Do you just not want them to use the word "weapon" anymore?
why should the state pay for gun safety? isn't that the parent's role?
Isn't the GOP the party against talking about birth control because it may lead teens to beleive that it is ok to have sex?
putting the NRA brand in every first grade classroom, essentially as an agent of the state in the area of education. how clever and cunning.
if American parenthood doesn't feel up to it, why not let public schools take over gun safety?
gun education in school? yes!
sex education in school? no!
ing Americans. pornographic gun blood and gun gore and wars everywhere, but a lady's nipple on TeeVee, HORRORS!
lol coward
Gun fellating sounds like a horrible pastime. It would create a bigger mess at the end than a bukkake flick.
boutons enjoys thinkprogress fellating
Me?
Yeah great point...Why should the state pay for it.
Why do you care what another state, you'll probably never, visit does?
OP's obsession with phallic shaped inanimate objects is a testimony to his own penis issues more than anything imho.
TeyshaBlue What is the Tolerable Upper Intake Level of Vitamin I?
I am afraid we may be passing it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
