Sondland said he “always believed that suspending aid to Ukraine was ill-advised,” and although he claims he did not know why the military assistance was initially suspended, Sondland said he later “presumed” that the aid “had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement.”
did not know
presumed
Not a single witness has confirmed that
your boy missed some green highlighting
"I always believed that suspending aid to Ukraine was ill-advised, although I did not know (and still do not know) when, why, or by whom the aid was suspended.
This is literally the definition of grasping at straws.
You're better off with the "dear leader can quid pro quo whatever he wants" defense.
Everybody’s lying except Trump, the professional con man who has made a career of lying about everything.
you've connected a pizza parlor band schedule to Hillary Clinton's drinking baby blood but somehow you can't understand a scheme that Dennison spelled out for you himself.
Not sure why you're laughing.
Explain.
Chirp crew doesn’t understand how this is an awful look for Dennison
Three amigs
Trumpistas: 329,999,999 liars in the Usa
1- honest human = dear leader Trump!
lolololol
Even the worthless republicans not wanting anything to do with guy.
It's not just that it is revised but that it is revised so that it is now in accord with all the other witnesses to the call and overall effort to get Ukraine to investigate Biden.
It just strikes me how dumb Trump is. The whole narrative got into his head over the Schweizer book and after Clinton Cash did so well for him he tried to egg it along. Only issue is that there is Bannon there to orchestrate it so their stupidity is hung out to dry.
What's your problem now? Due process bad now?
This is no different than when someone recants their confession when pressured.
He literally lawyered up and revised his testimony to fall in line with the parade of witnesses who hung him out to dry. This isn’t a guy who stands by his initial testimony. This is a guy trying to avoid a charge of perjury.
Subpoena Hunter Biden for what?
Anyone who is honest with themselves and with a half a brain can see that there is no witness that supports the "no quid pro" argument while there is a mountain to the affirmative. There are several felonies that correspond to the behavior.
It's going to be interesting if the Senate decides it is not "high crimes and misdemeanors" and votes accordingly. A not vote cannot reasonably be on the merits of the case.
It’s kinda comical when you think about it. Historically, the Congress has acted as a check on executive power. Throw a dart at any random Federalist and you’ll see some concern about power consolidating in the executive and the need to have the other branches check that.
A not guilty vote is essentially a ratification of the executive having the power to use the powers of office for his own (political) gain. That’s a pretty drastic departure from the original cons utional design. Question is whether that departure was inevitable.
Impeachment Inquiry Transcript Shows Devin Nunes Desperately Trying to Tie Steele Dossier to Ukraine
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/impeachment-inquiry-transcript-shows-devin-nunes-desperately-trying-to-tie-steele-dossier-to-ukraine/
CA doesn't send many Reps to Congress but those they are huge bags.
‘A bunch of BS’: Lindsey Graham chairs Senate Judiciary — but refuses to read any transcripts
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee revealed on Tuesday that he is refusing to examine any of the evidence against President Donald Trump.
Following the “do-over” testimony from Ambassador Gordon Sondland, Sen. Lindsey Graham’s defense of Trump was destroyed.
The South Carolina Republican is now simply refusing to read any of the evidence collected by impeachment inquiry.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/a-bunch-of-bs-lindsey-graham-chairs-senate-judiciary-but-refuses-to-read-any-transcripts/
the "law and order" Repugs don't GAS about any law that curtails thems
anticorruption...
It dont matter what you call it to sound proper.
He asked a foreign country to find out allegedly incriminating information on a political opponent for the presidency.
You cant change that.
Keep dog paddling while you sink.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)