Just as a side note, the amount of money getting dumped into these senate races has gotten so ing out of control thanks to Citizens United. The North Carolina and Iowa senate races will each have over $200 million of spending by election day (especially crazy given how cheap advertising in Iowa is), with 10 more that will have somewhere between $100 million to $200 million just on ads alone, and 90+% of that spending is money that comes from outside the state. This country is so ed up.
Just saw another clip where he said if democrats win they'll bring "a parade of horrible" to congress. Whatever that means.
Lady G probably helped him when he said black people can only go places in South Carolina if they're conservativeHe's less scared.
I think at this point not doing interviews helps him more.
Trump is madly tweeting at Nate Silver now after he broke down the latest ABC poll where Biden is leading by 17 points.
This new poll isn't very good for him either:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-t...n-nevada-iowa/
I'm nervous as about that Michigan senate race. Steve Bannon's pet Uncle Tom is running pretty compe ively.
If he can win the senate in South Carolina he looks a lot stronger than anyone else on the Democrats' bench, including Harris.Like I said. If he wins this senate race, he'll be running for president sooner than you think.
Lady G probably helped him when he said black people can only go places in South Carolina if they're conservative
Chris has some company.
it's really too bad charles booker didn't win in kentucky. he rose just a little too late.
but kentucky is pretty white so odds would've still been against him.
he would've raised even more money than harrison tbh.
Probably would have been wasted donations regardless, just like for McGrath. I did see that McGrath cut off her fundraising ads because they have more than they need and they want to funnel donations to other candidates.
I think there will be no small amount of blowback from the plot to kidnap the governor. Be interesting to see if that is correct.
Started at 73% a a few months ago.
Now stands at 86%
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...tion-forecast/
i don't see her winning but
https://www.c-span.org/video/?476816...-senate-debate
Sorry but some of McConnell's debate one liners are ing hilarious
"I think her whole campaign is that she was a marine and that she's a mom"
Republicans can get away with this stuff.Sorry but some of McConnell's debate one liners are ing hilarious
"I think her whole campaign is that she was a marine and that she's a mom"
A democrat making fun of a republican who served in the military is sacrilegious stuff but not the other way around.
McGrath saying she's a marine in every other sentence is pretty insufferable if we're being honest. She's an easy target.
Mitch McConnell didn’t offer any visions or solutions in that debate.
It would be a much tougher race with Charles Booker against him. His debate performance was weak, McGrath was just equally weak.
Trash CANNOT do a stimulus, even if he wanted one.
All he can do is sign an Act passed by Congress, and there McConnell is much powerful than Trash
McConnell knows the Repugs have lost, a big stimulus now is TOO late to help Repugs' elections, so he's intent on keeping the Real Economy a disaster to be handed to Biden and the Dems.
And if McConnell keeps the Senate, he will continue to block stimulus that Dems have passed, eg, HEROES act, and blame the bad economy on the Dems, like was strategy against Obama.
He simply doesn't care about suicide, depressions, evictions, homelessness, 10Ms of lost jobs, terminated companies, and obviously the rest of the Senate Repugs support whatever McConnell does.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-12-2020 at 10:06 PM.
He’s got a stiff personality and no campaign message beyond “I’m majority leader so I get a disproportionate amount of gubbamint help for Kentucky” while his approval rating in Kentucky is below 40%. This would be a compe ive race if the Dem candidate wasn’t so ing ty.
They both lose by 10+. Too many goat ers and welfare queens in Kentucky to make it an interesting race.
This race was too hyped for nothing.
I'm not saying Booker was the right candidate or anything (would have def been better than McGrath tho), but not sure why it's so hard to find a Kentucky version of Joe Manchin (i.e., a for the coal mining industry who caucuses with the Democrats).
that's a man right?
No, it's a turtle
yeah but it's a guy and a turtle
Why is McGrath dressed like a dude? She already has a natural masculine look, but she dressed like a dude for the debate.
(I personally don’t care about a candidate’s appearance, but women who look ugly do worse than ones who aren’t)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
