Solid sample size?
Do you realize that Bertans shot it at a lower percentage than Samanic when he was in Europe at the same age of 20? He shot it at a rate of 26.7%.
https://archive.fiba.com/pages/eng/f...hip/index.html
At the age of 21, Bertans joined a team called KK Union Olimpija and shot a 3pt rate of 21.7%.
At the age of 22 (the age Samanic will be coming into next season), Bertans joined a team called Partizan and shot a lot better with a higher usage rate.
From your post, you would be itching to conclude that Bertans was a poor shooter when he was 21 ignoring the context of the team around him and his role, which Luka shares in common with him right now.
Where we differ in opinion is just that: I believe there's not enough sample size on whether or not Luka is a poor shooter, and certainly not enough to project him as a good or bad shooter going forward. What we do have that we can go by, is his shooting form and his comfort level shooting 3's. You disagree with these points because you want to say a maximum of 6.5FGA during his Croatian career is enough evidence to use to say he's a bad shooter (
Bertans had a maximum of 9 to 11 FGA at an older age) AND you want to use g-league stats to gauge his skills. That is fine... you do you.
I merely think it's inconclusive. That is not a stretch.
Also, there's not much "statistical analysis" being performed in your prior posts so not sure why say that. If you want to go there, we can go there. I can pop open my excel spreadsheet and we can go at it. I have a lot of raw data I can pull from various types of players that shows Luka is not as far off as you think. What types of charts do you prefer? Bar graphs? Scatter plots?