Reply With Quote
what hey, there's a property qualification to run smack in this board?
lol you saying this is so ironic. You have a political agenda.
BwahhahabahabahhahahaHhahahHHahH
And you have no math skills
BwahahahahhahahahahahahhaahHH
what hey, there's a property qualification to run smack in this board?
th
^ more gossip, still no math
lolololoolibwhajahaauuuaaus
lmao f
El nono taking ChumpDumper place as f5 kinglmao f
He's triggered
And pwnd
f
actually flattered you two like me so muchf
you folded... now, you're lashing out.
th
Only a matter of time before the next one....
Kansas lololololoth
Only a matter of time before the next one....
f
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...7d&oe=5F4A5CCE
2005 it was ok
Yet you probably buy their propaganda of Hydroxyclhoriquine. Anthony Fauci, the man in charge of this scamdemic was being honest back then? Hmmm 🤔 explain that to me please.
Those doctors are controlled opposition PURPOSELY censored that were promoting another drug for a virus that doesn't exist.
Man the elite tactics work for you Trump supporters, hook, line and sinker. I don't know how you guys can't see this.
My guess is you have this mentality of "You see? Trump said ot works! Those doctors with lab coats said Hydroxyclhoriquine works too! They got censored so they must be telling the the truth!!"
You people fall for the divide and conquer strategy by the elites so easily. They control the left vs right or Democrats vs Republicans. They plan everything. They are smart they know how you guys think. Psychological warfare.
ducks koriwhat Nathan89 Chris CosmicCowboy DMC DarrinS Millennial_Messiah FrostKing SnakeBoy thispego TSA phxspurfan Spurtacular Thread
As I have stated before you are a fckin idiot.Yet you probably buy their propaganda of Hydroxyclhoriquine. Anthony Fauci, the man in charge of this scamdemic was being honest back then? Hmmm 樂 explain that to me please.
Those doctors are controlled opposition PURPOSELY censored that were promoting another drug for a virus that doesn't exist.
Man the elite tactics work for you Trump supporters, hook, line and sinker. I don't know how you guys can't see this.
My guess is you have this mentality of "You see? Trump said ot works! Those doctors with lab coats said Hydroxyclhoriquine works too! They got censored so they must be telling the the truth!!"
You people fall for the divide and conquer strategy by the elites so easily. They control the left vs right or Democrats vs Republicans. They plan everything. They are smart they know how you guys think. Psychological warfare.
ducks koriwhat Nathan89 Chris CosmicCowboy DMC DarrinS Millennial_Messiah FrostKing SnakeBoy thispego TSA phxspurfan Spurtacular Thread
Read the paper authored by Fauci in 2005 that ducks put out then:
Understand the following if you have any nerve signals left in your celery brain.
Here is what happens if you actually go to the journal and the conclusion:
Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in primate cell culture.
Do you have any understanding of the you put out?
This is typical Trump "facts". Distortion and disingenous statements to PURPOSELY confuse the country he is running.
And the ducks will follow in line.
This is why it was tried in the first place ducks.
Do you understand the bolded?
This is a bad as lying to your own people, good job ducks.
SARS not Covid 19
Cell Culture, not in bodies ducks.
Primate cells that are CULTURED ducks, go back and look at the primate cells ducks, what did they use? Just want to see if you can read.
You are an idiot and DONT have a clue as to what they were studying.
Do you understand what in vivo and in vitro mean?
There is a Gigantic difference. And yes, its different from the Venmo app.
66 Global HCQ studies (39 peer reviewed): PrEP, PEP, and early treatment studies show high effectiveness, while late treatment shows mixed results.
https://c19study.com/
Yeah all those studies have the exact same validity so just add em up and hallelujah, it works!
You will notice the guy who actually did the first hopeful study in 2005 is on your list.
And he has read all the info and says no.
But you add those up.
TOO LATE, THE JURY'S IN, NO DO-OVERS!
which studies do you specifically take issue with?
Operation Rabbit Hole has commenced.
Take the first one. It's not a study, it's a letter (hopefully a study that can be peer reviewed follows). Furthermore, the conclusion isn't that HCQ works, but that it requires further study.
Although unmeasured confounding remains the most likely explanation for the discrepancies, a robust meta-analysis is still lacking and we question whether hydroxychloroquine should be further tested.
Yet, it's marked as positive in the list...
Frankly, the fact that Gummi Bear links to the site makes it suspect already. There's much better places to look for HCQ tests that are not hand picked and not rated anonymously, tbh.
tbh, find me a more comprehensive list and I'll take a look. I posted this list to question why so many here in the US are trying to suppress a cheap treatment and dismiss it as ineffective when so many studies around the world are showing success. Why do you think this is occurring here?
Not a study?
A total of 539 COVID-19 hospitalised patients were included in our cohort in Milan, from February 24 to May 17,2020 of whom 174 died in hospital (day 14 probability of death: 29.5%–95%CI: 25.5–34.0). We divided a subset of our cohort in three groups who started treatment a median of 1 day after admission: those receiving hydroxycholoroquine alone (N = 197), those receiving hydroxycholoroquine + azithromycin (N = 94), and those receiving neither (controls) (N = 92). Of the latter group, 10 started HIV antivirals (boosted-lopinavir or –darunavir), 1 teicoplanin, 12 immunomodulatory drugs or corticosteroids, 23 heparin and 46 remained untreated. The percent of death in the 3 groups was 27%, 23% and 51%. Mechanical ventilation was used in 4.3% of hydoxychloroquine, 14.2% of hydroxycholoroquine + azithromycin and 26.1% of controls. Unweighted and weighted relative hazards of mortality are shown in Table 1. After adjusting for a number of key confounders (see table), the use of hydroxycholoroquine + azithromycin was associated with a 66% reduction in risk of death as compared to controls; the analysis also suggested a larger effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in patients with less severe COVID-19 disease (PO2/FiO2 > 300, interaction p-value<.0001). Our results are remarkably similar to those shown by Arshad et al.
Some important weaknesses of the analysis by Arshad have been pointed out (Lee et al., 2020) but not all of these apply to our study. Our propensity scores include some of the potential confounders that were missing in the analysis by Arshad (e.g. calendar day of admission, disease severity, cardio-vascular disease (CVD), baseline plasma CRP); second, we have excluded people receiving other drugs which could have biased the effect of hydroxychloroquine when used in combination. Third, although residual confounding is a possibility (e.g. people with CVD were more frequent in control), people in the control group were more likely to undergo mechanical ventilation that is a conservative bias. These results from two different real-life settings (Italy and USA), are conflicting with those of two large randomised trials (Horby et al., 2020, World Health Organization, 2020). Although unmeasured confounding remains the most likely explanation for the discrepancies, a robust meta-analysis is still lacking and we question whether hydroxychloroquine should be further tested. When best to start treatment is also a question that needs to be addressed in ad-hoc randomised studies.
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S...600-7/fulltext
Yet the FDA, after issuing and then revoking emergency, has not re-issued
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
