Another strawman, since that's the left's version of what 2A supporters believe. (amazing that the 2nd Amendment to Bill of Rights can be characterized as having "supporters" and non supporters. What other Amendment has that distinction?)
As a 2A supporter (along with 1A and the rest of the BoR), I don't want everyone to have a gun. I think everyone who's legally and cons utionally clear to own a firearm should have that choice. I also don't think guns are always the solution. I think they are rarely the solution.
So you're one of those 2A supporters you just mentioned above that thinks more armed people is better? Of course not, but then why did you separate yourself from your "general advocacy" statement above? General advocacy is what I stated. Only gun retailers think everyone should own a gun. The rest of us would prefer it was only us.
Left wing Poster A makes sloppy, broad brush comment, gets called out. (RG)
Left wing Poster A makes a sloppy retort in defense (RG didn't return lol)
Left wing Poster B shows up and makes a different defense, gets called out for the original claim (I think that's you this time, El. )
Left wing Poster B denies ever making the original claim, even though poster B is defending it (right on cue tbh)
Left wing Poster C shows up, defends original claim, defends poster B
Left wing Poster C gets called out, denies caring about the original claim, denies supporting Poster B, still wants a back and forth about the original claim. (or we could be here, I cannot recall)
Left wing Poster D shows up, posts a strawman meme about the attack on the original claim
The responses pretty much cease because of the web of that's developed,
Left wing Poster E calls fold
rinse and repeat
Sorry to drop that here, but you started by saying RG's broad brush wasn't a strawman, and that "everyone" wasn't infants and convicts. I wasn't even considering that level of pedantry. Now you're saying you want to ignore RG's comment and talk instead about the analogy of a strawman.
It was an analogy of using a strawman (see above).