Reply With Quote
if BSU ditched the pathetic WAC for the MWC, it would be at least #5 on that list.
the MWC would have to become a BCS conference then, otherwise it's just as well to have BSU or some MWC team go undefeated every year to crash the BSC party
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/column...ark&id=4460507
not sure that the Pac-10 isn't tied with the Big 12 at this point. we'll see...
if BSU ditched the pathetic WAC for the MWC, it would be at least #5 on that list.
the MWC would have to become a BCS conference then, otherwise it's just as well to have BSU or some MWC team go undefeated every year to crash the BSC party
lets get boise state in the Pac-10. btw, utah beat san jose state by 10...surprising.
I've read that the Pac-10 has absolutely no desire to change anything, no matter how bad the Washingtons and anyone else gets. They're just going to sit back and ride the USC gravy train, like the WAC with BSU
Last edited by vander; 09-13-2009 at 10:01 PM.
don't agree with that at all, though you may be joking. i'm sure it has more to do with money than anything else...but not just cause USC. and because of other sports.They're just going to sit back and ride the USC gravy train, like the WAC with BSU
Pac-10 is the best football conference by far. No other conference even comes close.
you're funny
didn't the MWC almost go undefeated against the pac 10 last year?
Last Year Forum
I heard the exact opposite. The Pac-10 was in talks to expand to a 12 team conference with two divisions and invite Utah and Colorado. TCU would then join the Big-12 to replace Colorado and the MWC and WAC would either combine into a 16 team conference or the WAC would give up 1 team to the MWC.I've read that the Pac-10 has absolutely no desire to change anything, no matter how bad the Washingtons and anyone else gets. They're just going to sit back and ride the USC gravy train, like the WAC with BSU
I don't think there's any doubt about which conf. is #1.
wow, Utah and Colorado? I thought the Pac-10 preferred the in state rivalry pairs, Utah and BYU would work better.
but yeah, it's been well over a year since I was scouring the internet looking for conference rumblings, things could have changed a lot since then
I like most of that though, TCU should be in the Big 12 instead of Colorado, the Pac-10 should add 2 teams and get a championship game, and the WAC should join up with the MWC, dropping some of the FCS quality teams like Idaho, New Mexico State, etc
It's unfortunate that hicks in Texas don't realize that the Pac-10 is by far the best conference in college football.
spurstradomus, i dont know how much you read the college sports forum
some posters, have a shtick or a go to subject that they post over and over and over again to get the same responses over and over and over again
theres also an old interwebs saying-dont feed the trolls
we all know a conference isnt the best at , and we all know what that conference is
ignore these people
you just made this posters day, and so did I, but im posting this for the common good of the spurstalk community
If you wanted to do good for the spurstalk community you would admit that the Pac-10 RULES COLLEGE FOOTBALL! Don't blame me. I'm just a messenger.
Due to slavery, the SEC is the best conference in college football.
What's odd about that is that the ACC hasn't yielded an elite team in a while but they have A LOT of talent in that conference. Maybe 2nd most talented conference but like 4th or 5th best conference.
SEC = Overrated
What might be even odder is that the ACC tried to strengthen their conference to get closer to the level of the SEC by adding the Big East powerhouses of Miami and Virginia Tech. But soon after those programs started to regress and the Big East in general got better instead of worse for it.
I have often wondered why the ACC hasn't been better over the years.
OMG that's so wrong, hilarious and probably true...all in one. Big XII was the best last year but the SEC has since taken over.
by "last year" do you mean, like, "in the previous era" or is that literal.
SEC has been dominant for most of the 21st century
Yes, I mean last year...not yesteryear. The Big XII was the best overall conference in 2008. The SEC is the best in 2009 so far...
Hardly. Check the record against other BCS Conferences. The Pac-10 is #1.
Great win by USC this weekend. The SEC has 3 teams in the Top 5 and one of them will be in the national championship.
Schlong, you think Portland State can be a BCS buster this year? I, personally, think they have what it takes.
So what? It's all about non-conference opponents and bowl games.
My purpose is to bring enlightenment.
You're right, the SEC will end up having better bowl games than the Pac-10. Portland State would put the Pac-10 over the top though.
As far as non-conference games go, you know better Schlong. Those games are irrelevant unless you have a good record at the end of the season. You don't receive a great bowl bid by losing two or three conference games and beating one good non-conference opponent. Plus, what non-conference success has the Pac-10 had besides the USC/Ohio St. game? Oregon over Utah doesn't count.
Go Beavers!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
