Reply With Quote
Rubes like you want people to believe Biden is winning military votes 900-0.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...e-source-code/
derp melting down
Rubes like you want people to believe Biden is winning military votes 900-0.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...e-source-code/
He tries to steal every single shtick that works on him.
Lame duck president doesn't get to decide any of that.
derp melting down
Derp®️ trying to hide behind an alt. What a pussy.
Admitted cuckold still pretending he has hand. What a dip .
Everyone knows the fix was in. Anyone saying otherwise is a certified liar.
BLACK FRIDAY PANIC: CNN Airs Possible Path for Trump 2020 Win
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...rump-2020-win/
Don't tell Winehole23 this poor fellaBLACK FRIDAY PANIC: CNN Airs Possible Path for Trump 2020 Win
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...rump-2020-win/
BLACK FRIDAY PANIC: CNN Airs Possible Path for Trump 2020 Win
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...rump-2020-win/
You two make quite the impaired pair.Don't tell Winehole23 this poor fella
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...ts-gpx-vpx.cnn
You two make quite the impaired pair.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...ts-gpx-vpx.cnn
That was before the rubber was meeting the road and somehow isn't valid now
It isn't valid now. It was a what if dream scenario that could've happened before certification.
Hillary could've also had paid for the Trump electors votes back in 2016 too.
That's how implausible scenarios works, derp.
She could have tried; and indeed many of these same lefty perps were pushing for that.It isn't valid now. It was a what if dream scenario that could've happened before certification.
Hillary could've also had paid for the Trump electors votes back in 2016 too.
That's how implausible scenarios works, derp.
But the 2016 election was a legit win for Trump and Hillary had no traction for that.
You're desperate to pretend it's the same situation.
OP misspelled 'From' in the threat le...
It’s not the same situation. Biden won by double and triple the margins of Trump in 2 of the 3 states.
155k and 80k is definitely not the same as 10k and 40k respectively. Lol derp
If you are so confident derp, bet on a trump consecutive term. I bet that Biden won.
Trump loses, you leave ST forever or trump wins, I leave. Let us see who is president on Jan 21, 2021.
Accept the bet and others will join or are you scared? Too much of a beta make to accept the challenge?
Yea, in the former impossibly high batches for a cheater was being processed. In the latter, there is no evidence of that type of scam.
You should just go and hit the tranny club and bawl to your sisters. You're not suited for this.
I'm not a stranger to it, in fact I was briefly worried about the possibility. There was some discussion of it a week or two ago in this forum.Don't tell Winehole23 this poor fella
The fatal problem with the rogue elector scenario is that is that the states are bound to follow the law.
States have the power to change the manner of appointing electors, but Congress controls the timing.
https://www.justsecurity.org/73274/n...-popular-vote/But Congress’s enactment of a uniform national Election Day under its own cons utional authority — which supersedes any contrary state actions — prohibits the choice of electors from being made based on elections held or laws passed after Election Day.
In other words, under the cons utional timing provision as implemented by federal law, the absolute last day a state legislature could have decided to appoint the state’s presidential electors for this election was November 3, 2020. Once that date passed, the determinative popular votes had all been cast, and therefore the legislature’s authority to change the state’s manner of appointing electors in 2020 passed as well.
Here's the federal law that gives effect to the timing clause:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/1The electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed, in each State, on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, in every fourth year succeeding every election of a President and Vice President.
States debasing or diluting votes is uncons utional:
https://www.justsecurity.org/73274/n...-popular-vote/There is a second, independent reason state legislatures cannot cancel the popular vote results after Election Day: to do so would violate the Cons utional rights of the voters. Specifically, the Fourteenth Amendment to the Cons ution prohibits states from taking away their citizens’ rights without due process of law. One such right, of course, is the right to vote. And the Supreme Court has made clear many times, in more than a hundred years’ worth of precedents, that the cons utional right to vote does not just mean the right to put a ballot in a box, but also the right to have that ballot counted toward determining the election’s results. For a state legislature to invalidate a popular election would be equivalent to simply refusing to count the citizens’ votes. The Cons ution unambiguously prohibits disenfranchising any eligible voters, much less an entire state’s worth.
The above quoted finds support in this Supreme Court case:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/533/The right of suffrage is denied by debasement or dilution of a citizen's vote in a state or federal election.
Last edited by Winehole23; 11-28-2020 at 01:42 AM.
Biden will be inaugurated Jan 20th and he will be the next president. That is it and that is all.
Please, be like trump with Flynn and give derp a “paroned.”
I'm told it aired again on Thursday.
Reck is simply grasping at straws and you LOVE to see it.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
