Reply With Quote
damn
didn't watch all of it but will try to later. Trump seems to do well when his back is against the wall and cornered, in this case by the Establishment and their fraudulent media.
check this out son, seems like they were rehearsing some . Chris on here posted a CNN clip from the 90s of them faking SCUD attacks, so who knows what propaganda those ers are capable of.lol at using Clinton News Network polls
Did y'all see that CNN house negro panelist desperately try to overblow Trumps 'you'd be in jail' burn? Talking about how it was scary, a threat to Shillary, and that Trump could turn into a dictator.
She could have evolved just fine. I did over 15 years. Imo she probably never gave a and still doesn't. Politically its smart and she is a politician. With that said it is the right thing to support. Also she believed in equality for gay couples outside of marriage for quite some time if I recall correctly. Or I could be wayyy off, that's just what i remember.
Nice find
That video in case anyone is interested; it was Charles Jaco selling us the 1990 Persian Gulf 'crisis'.
A " " eh? Okay.
Hey, El, seriously, have you ever watched your children masturbate?
Its been painfully obvious that they've been shilling for her since the primaries. Media, DNC, gubamint behind her and the corrupt still struggled to get through Bernie and is struggling with the Don.
lol Reck
It's OK if you ridicule him in private as long as you say yes sir, Boss in person.Growing up republican.
That kid is marked for ridicule in life already.
I wonder how many people it took to come up with the Lincoln explanation - that was just begging for Trump's comment about Honest Abe and her lying. And if Trump becomes president, his "I'm gonna get my AG to assign a special prosecutor to look into ..." - with all the physical evidence destroyed, that's a dead-end. But maybe that's him throwing a bone to the Republicans so no more bail on him (they like all that prison talk). You cannot dream up this stuff - lol.
I thought Trump slightly won - he hit more of his points than at the 1st debate - he should have hammered more on her "open trade" and "open borders". RE: the taxes - he should have said that SHE used a ($700k) carryover too. She was much better at speaking directly to whoever in the audience was asking a question - he paced around too much.
I don't understand one thing. Candidates I thought hired people to coach them what to do and not do during rallies, debates, etc.... Didn't anyone show him prior debates of things not to do? American people are pretty dumb when it comes to liking candidates over the dumbest stuff. I personally thought Gore won every single debate against GW in 2000. But it was the constant pacing around that made him look bad with I guess some undecided votes like he was coming across as a bully. He lost. (well not really but...) Then you fast forward to 2008, McCain wandering around the stage, didn't anyone in his camp bother to tell him that comes across as looking, erratic, edgy, unstable, creepy? I can see if there was no guideline for him to go off of. But there is. Or maybe they did and he couldn't help himself? The whole thing just seems fixed to me. I came in to this debate not expecting Hillary to be able to land the knockout punch, and guess what she didn't. Nobody won this debate imo. Trump talked over her and bantered the whole night. Hillary sound like her usual self in trying to defend her emails, or referring people to Hillary.com. It was a joke I thought. Still voting for her because Trump is a certified nut job.Now I just wish that Sanders could had won the nomination because otherwise this mess wouldn't be at all close. Now we are holding out breath with a flawed candidate that she can pull through against this giant buffoon. smh
Last edited by florige; 10-10-2016 at 07:23 AM.
I've been really bummed that I've been going about it so wrong for so many years...you know...first small talk...get them interested and talking about themselves...then casually work that into a second non threatening date...dinner and a movie or something like that...
damn.
After all these years I finally learn that all you have to do is grab em by the pussy.
1- Regarding the debates...It felt like I was watching the latest episode of Shameless...
2- Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway always looks like she was rode hard & put away wet...
I thought he said he doesn't like telegraphing his attacks. Now Obama can just pardon her. That's not what Eisenhower would have done. Amateur.
Every time I think this campaign can't actually find a new low, there's another day and another disappointment.
Did anyone see this
Maybe he'll threaten to imprison three generations of her family next debate?
She's STILL claiming she only deleted person emails. FBI says this is false. Thousands were work-related. #debate
— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) October 10, 2016
Donald Trump's highest moment when he held Hillary liable for her emails and called for a special prosecutor. #debate pic.twitter.com/V4eEIjnMlG
— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) October 10, 2016
Trump's attack on Clinton's emails is pretty sharp this time.
— Ryan Struyk (@ryanstruyk) October 10, 2016
Hillary is struggling to defend herself. The group simply doesn't believe her. #debate pic.twitter.com/7xqE6c2Nfn
— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) October 10, 2016
Trump actually doing really well, clearly prepared this time, bringing up emails in boxes, wiped email #Debate
— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 10, 2016
The group cares more about Hillary's emails than Trump's "locker room talk." #debate
— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) October 10, 2016
Trump hitting his stride last 20 mins
— Rich Lowry (@RichLowry) October 10, 2016
Trump's line distinguishing Honest Abe Lincoln and Hillary was pretty good
— Jim Merrill (@JimMerrillNH) October 10, 2016
Don't think Clinton's "public/private" answer is going work well. "Lincoln" anecdote smacked of evasion
— Chuck Todd (@chucktodd) October 10, 2016
It's halftime – who's winning the debate so far?
• 17 say Trump
• 4 say Hillary
• 9 tied
— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) October 10, 2016
Clinton lied in the debate. The US intelligence community did not say that WikiLeaks is 'part of' alleged state backed hacking at any time.
How can Obama pardon her if she's hasn't been found guilty of anything yet? Any investigation would not be until after Trump is president (on the minuscule chance he wins).
Didn't she lie about the red line?
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...-sand-comment/
well, good morning.
Nothing in the Cons ution appears to require that the person benefitting from a pardon have already been convicted of a crime. The limit is that a pardon cannot be granted for something that hasn't yet occurred, which would basically allow a waiver of the law and not a post-hoc grant of relief from it.
Frankly, until last night's threats, I don't think there was any need to pardon Hillary Clinton. But if Trump wins, I'd expect President Obama to offer a very broadly worded pardon, if only to avoid the stunningly bad precedent that fulfilling Trump's threats would create.
Last edited by FromWayDowntown; 10-10-2016 at 10:43 AM.
can not pardon someone not convicted
he does not like her anyhow he just hates trump
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
