Reply With Quote
The rules just became weird. It looks like the thots will still be able to make nudes, just no one will have to be around.
Anyhow, whoever gave money to any of these thots should kill himself.
“What’s a 9 to 5 job like?”
The rules just became weird. It looks like the thots will still be able to make nudes, just no one will have to be around.
Anyhow, whoever gave money to any of these thots should kill himself.
they should take out the twitch simps first tbqh.
dont you like the hot tub content?
the simps will never change, they will always waste money on these thots that give zero s about them. I actually cant even fault the thots, but the simps really are pathetic.
The more banks continue to resist the way things are, the better it is for crypto currency.
Incels and simps everywhere are losing their minds.
I remember this a couple months ago
I remember this a couple months ago
If the banks are getting hunged up on the fact Onlyfans is basically for porn, why dont they apply the same logic to actual porn sites that uses their services all the same?
Apparently this is why the change is been made. So you're not ok with Onlyfans but ok with actual porn sites? I dont get it.
Either way, you cant let es be making whatever money they want. You have to at least set some limts on how much you earn.
I remember this a couple months ago
I've heard that OF also had trouble finding investors because of their current business model. But banning porn just means they will still continue having trouble finding investors, but this time it'll be for having a business model that doesn't generate any substantial revenue.
Good for her, and shame on the religious orgs putting pressure on MasterCard etc and causing this company to basically fold. Let people do what they want with their money. I'm sure the big porn sites owned by a few are gleeful about this too.
What a surprise.
Only s is back in the extortion game.
OnlyFans said the changes followed requests by "banking partners and payout providers."
In an interview with the Financial Times that published earlier this week, OnlyFans CEO Tim Stokley blamed banks such as Bank of New York Mellon and JP Morgan, whom he said had blocked OnlyFans' payments to creators and shut down their accounts. (Those companies declined to comment to CNN Business on Tuesday.)
If onlyfans goes down another site will simply replace it
the money and demand will go somewhere
He should have paid that money for liposuction, he might get his own .
Fabbs, you seem like someone who would be right smack in the middle of that simp .
They reversed the decision.
Something wasn’t squaring up when they gave that banking excuse. This proves it wasn’t the banks. They just can’t attract investors to sustain their model because it relies on s being s and that’s not really a good look if you’re an upstanding company.
Chumpettes want to give all their money to s like Kamala.
They are the simps, the incels, nerds, pussies, etc... They know it's true and if yesterday's debacle in the "Junk Filter Thread" didn't prove it IDK what will.Chumpettes want to give all their money to s like Kamala.
I'm still trying to find out why dudes are funding this bull when there's literally millions of free sites to jack off on..
This is more amateur model based. Not just girl next door but your co-worker.
I'm starting to wonder if this was a publicity stunt. How many new clients or users did they attract recently.
Spoken from experience.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
