Versed? Nope.
I've heard it mentioned, but don't recall it distinctly. Something to do with Cook County, IL?
Personal attacks
You're so intolerant of my non respectful insistence
got Chump
Versed? Nope.
I've heard it mentioned, but don't recall it distinctly. Something to do with Cook County, IL?
Texas and Illinois.
What happened in Texas?
filibustering and personal attacks
That's whataboutism that doesn't dispel the point: voting fraud is exceedingly rare AND prosecuted. Something that you will waive off because your hatred towards blue teamsters makes it impossible for you to acknowledge people vote the way they do.
Not being 'in' into every one of your absurd conspiracy theories is not ignorance either, it's being pragmatic. It's actually the exact opposite of ignorance.
Whataboutism
That's really convenient. We're talking about a sitting president scamming for many millions vs. a single guy sloppily skirting a dumb law.
The point is that your crying was trite when compared to actual corruption.
Walk us through that, derp.
It's your claim-- tell us what he did.
I won't walk you through it; but if you want to find out the scam, try learning about it by researching how Obama altered the card donation process so it could not be checked if donations were coming from overseas. That said, I fully expect you to simply sperm shield.
Derp folds.
Oh, you won't be researching it, sperm shielder?
Color me surprised.
lol Dump
You already folded, derp. Don't try to bite ankles now.
lol
Doing your hero's approach of accusing others of doing the exact thing you're doing.
Huh?
I asked you to back up your claim and you folded.
This is nothing new.
Why do you always fold?
You're the one ankle biting. I gave you a lead, and now you're just being a little instead of looking into it.
homework assignment.
I already know about the relevant federal case. Unfortunately for you, Trump's DOJ says you're full of .
How do you like being on by Trump, derp?
Maybe you should do your homework. You might get smarter.
Nope, Trump took a wet on your conspiracy theory. Nothing you post changes that.
How does it taste?
Salty?
I have no idea what you're talking about; I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about, tbh.
Exactly
You never do.
If you knew anything about this you would know about the Trump DOJ's case about it in federal court.
You don't.
Thanks for confirming your complete ignorance of a subject you brought up.
There's stuff I like know about that you don't
This is a big tiny W. Like really big
Desperate Chump
don't get mad, derp.
You brought up the subject.
Now you admit you're completely ignorant about the federal case that addressed it.
You must feel really stupid right now.
lol too bad.
It's actually convenient for you, not for me. I'm not the one attempting to excuse one factual conviction with another alleged crime. "Dumb law" is not a defense either.
The whole spectrum in full display here: whataboutism followed by moral relativism. Add in a sprinkle or two of paranoia, conspira ism and hate... yahtzee.
Again, you're the one with the gullibility problem, not me.
I never excused it; I did downplay it, as it's obvious that it's a politically motivated conviction and it's really nothing compared to serious corruption. You cling to your stuff that is nothing in the run of things if you must; it complements your willful ignorance, tbh. Also @ gullibility.
^ moar conspiracies. He broke the law, he had his day in court, he was convicted by a jury of his peers. He wasn't tried by an administration, that's delusion talking.
Trying to excuse crime A with crime B *is* both whataboustism and moral relativism. Breaking the law is bad in *all* cases, regardless of party colors, etc.
And yes, gullible describes you to a T... how else can you describe somebody buying in all sorts of conspiracy theories and dogma? That's exactly what a gullible person is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)