The biological fact that is undeniable and completely turned-a-blind-eye to is that males and females are drastically different and that while men and women both have functioning brains, the way men use them and the way that women use them are drastically different. Obviously, there are exceptions in every case, but you have to make the utilitarian decision based on the hard data. Females wear their hearts on their sleeves and therefore should not be decision makers in any way. Males vote analytically and practically, i.e. voting with their brain, while females vote with their hearts, i.e. voting on all the wrong issues and are easily influenced and gullible by irrelevant issues that do not have a long term importance to the continuous improvement of the whole of society, freedom and individualism and a strong country and economy. Females are NOT quality decision makers and voting for elected officials is perhaps the biggest decision one can make in any society that includes a government. Females are biologically inferior to males in every which way, but most especially in terms of practical decision science; therefore, they should not be equally responsible for voting and determining who should be elected to govern the nation, at all levels (federal, state and local).
That said, I do NOT support abolishing any of the 1865 Post-Civil War Lincoln Civil Rights Amendments (13th-15th)... because there is no biological evidence that any non-white man is more or less inferior to the white man. All men are created equal, and should have the equal right to vote for leaders who govern at all levels.