Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    lol cutler>orton

  2. #2
    Ina world of hype, we win IronMexican's Avatar
    My Team
    Oakland Raiders
    Post Count
    24,612
    Who's troll is this anyways?

  3. #3
    Who's troll is this anyways?
    lolol

  4. #4
    Who's troll is this anyways?
    lolol

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    Denver Broncos
    Post Count
    12,134
    well.........yeah........no .

  6. #6
    Big like a pickle. Shank's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,035
    well.........yeah........no .
    304/485
    62% comp rate
    3371 yards
    20 TD
    9 INT
    225 yds/game
    89.3 QB rating

    314/519
    60.5% comp rate
    3390 yards
    23 TD
    26 INT
    226 yds/game
    73.6 QB rating

  7. #7
    lol making a case for Orton over Cutler.

    One gets to throw to Brandon Marshall, the other gets to throw to Devin Hester.

  8. #8
    Big like a pickle. Shank's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,035
    lol making a case for Orton over Cutler.

    One gets to throw to Brandon Marshall, the other gets to throw to Devin Hester.
    lol he threw to Marshall last year and where did that get him?

    That "he has no WRs" excuse is bull . He had all the offensive talent he needed in Denver and still couldn't win games. He knew the situation with the WRs before he got there. Orton threw to Hester and still won games. Cutler.

  9. #9
    Crap > texans LOL texans's Avatar
    Post Count
    1,188
    lol he threw to Marshall last year and where did that get him?

    That "he has no WRs" excuse is bull . He had all the offensive talent he needed in Denver and still couldn't win games. He knew the situation with the WRs before he got there. Orton threw to Hester and still won games. Cutler.
    So you are saying they both suck huh?

    I happen to agree.

  10. #10
    Big like a pickle. Shank's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,035
    So you are saying they both suck huh?

    I happen to agree.
    Actually, yeah. That's about right. Each can do good things for their respective teams but neither is a worldbeater. I actually think Cutler would have cost Denver a few of the games they won earlier in the season. But, at the same time, he would have been able to help the offense with some of the stinkers they've put up lately. For Chicago, Orton wouldn't have put them in the same holes as Cutler did for some of their losses this year.

    On a scale of 50-100, they're both around 70-75 in the way of QBs.

  11. #11
    Crap > texans LOL texans's Avatar
    Post Count
    1,188
    Actually, yeah. That's about right. Each can do good things for their respective teams but neither is a worldbeater. I actually think Cutler would have cost Denver a few of the games they won earlier in the season. But, at the same time, he would have been able to help the offense with some of the stinkers they've put up lately. For Chicago, Orton wouldn't have put them in the same holes as Cutler did for some of their losses this year.

    On a scale of 50-100, they're both around 70-75 in the way of QBs.

    Orton has a better at ude towards the game. More coachable aswell I'd imagine. That puts him a notch above Cutler as a player and 10 notches above Cutler as a man.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •