After 40,000 absolutely worthless posts, you finally make a post you have uncanny and unmatched expertise in.
I'd say you're the expert in black lady-men as well, but FkLA might have you beat there.
Anything to relieve the navel orange of his duties.
Anything...
After 40,000 absolutely worthless posts, you finally make a post you have uncanny and unmatched expertise in.
I'd say you're the expert in black lady-men as well, but FkLA might have you beat there.
Nobody? New York is the populous city in America and one of the most liberal, yet Bloomberg won three straight elections there running against democrats in general elections.
It's better to him than having to face the truth or worse yet, having to actually think for himself.
Bull . He has huge rallies all the time in which he is quite entertaining. He killed it at the debates, too.
Your head is at the bottom of the barrel tbh.
Muh establishment "truth" though.
NYC mayor and USA president are different ball games. If Bloomberg can buy the corporate-backed news out, then it could be a boost. But I suspect he would have already done so if he could have.
Nobody here likes Bloomberg; that should be your first clue. Sure Chumpettes will pay him lip service if he tickles their ears with the anti Trump stuff; but nobody has cared a damn for the guy.
I wonder who stands to benefit from a billionaire centrist dropping into the race on Super Tuesday. Seems intuitive that he'd steal more votes from Biden/Buttigieg/Harris than the candidates he's supposedly worried about, Sanders and Warren.
Look at how NYC voted last election vs. the rest of America. Need I say more?
More vacant hilarity from Spurtacular.
More dream casting from blakehole.
Break it down for us, profe. How does this work?
Politics is largely kayfabe, down with the fecal duality!
https://images.app.goo.gl/Mpmp4G3YKHfqqLDS9
old billionaire white male. Should turn out well
Yeah, no. He has a 30% base that will show up to any rally, plus he's the only game in town as far s the GOP goes, and yet none of that is indicative of likeability or approval to the job he's done.
And he was terrible at the debates. The compe ion was just as awful though, plus you have to add Shillary is one candidate that's definitely more unlikeable than him.
I've brought him up before...
Actually, NYC pretty much voted in-line with the rest of America...
Like Trump, Spurtacular is likely in denial about the popular vote. But in fairness, popular votes don't win presidential elections.
I just don't see Trump winning re-election unless the democratic nominee totally implodes (which isn't impossible). 2020 election is going to be high turnout and that won't benefit Trump.
Ruth have a heartache and steps done
Republicans will run to the polls
You sicko
Bloomberg first registered as a Democrat last year. Do you expect him to steal votes from the left wing of the Dems?
I didn't claim they win elections. But If we're discussing how the vast majority of voters cast their vote in the last election, then we're talking about popular vote.
He won the debates. And his rallies are certainly an indicator of popularity. Media spins it, and you go with it. Shillary was not only one more unlikeable. Barry could practically only do college campuses in 2012 because even the blacks wouldn't show up for him.
Why are you asking me? I already said he's a non factor unless his money can somehow pervade the establishment enough.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)