Reply With Quote
Those numbers have been debunked.
This isn't:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6942e2.htmThe total number of excess deaths (deaths above average levels) from January 26 through October 3 ranged from a low of approximately 841 in the youngest age group (<25 years) to a high of 94,646 among adults aged 75–84 years.§§ However, the average percentage change in deaths over this period compared with previous years was largest for adults aged 25–44 years (26.5%) (Figure 2). Overall, numbers of deaths among persons aged <25 years were 2.0% below average,¶¶ and among adults aged 45–64, 65–74 years, 75–84, and ≥85 years were 14.4%, 24.1%, 21.5%, and 14.7% above average, respectively.
Nor is this:
Between March 1 and August 1, 2020, 1 336 561 deaths occurred in the US, a 20% increase over expected deathshttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...b-2cc3c20a94b7Of the 225 530 excess deaths, 150 541 (67%) were attributed to COVID-19. Joinpoint analyses revealed an increase in deaths attributed to causes other than COVID-19, with 2 reaching statistical significance. US mortality rates for heart disease increased between weeks ending March 21 and April 11 (APC, 5.1 [95% CI, 0.2-10.2]), driven by the spring surge in COVID-19 cases. Mortality rates for Alzheimer disease/dementia increased twice, between weeks ending March 21 and April 11 (APC, 7.3 [95% CI, 2.9-11.8]) and between weeks ending June 6 and July 25 (APC, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.8-2.3]), the latter coinciding with the summer surge in sunbelt states.
Those numbers have been debunked.
Show us where, profe.
The studies I linked were published after the Principia Scientifica article, how can it be accurate at all to say the CDC and JAMA studies were debunked when they were not even addressed? Hand waving about comorbidities doesn't get you past the finish line.
Let's stipulate, arguendo, that you're a hemophiliac and that I have a large knife. If I stab you and you bleed out, the proper cause of death is hemophilia, right?
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-30-2020 at 03:31 AM.
You can watch this if you don't like reading
I read the article, thanks. It's more argumentative than analytical, tbh.You can watch this if you don't like reading
For example, this bit of fiat reasoning right at the beginning. Fine and well to say SARS-CoV-2 is not a new pathogen and isn't proven to cause disease, but to do so without offering support, or pointing out how the existing studies saying it is a novel pathogen and does sicken and kill people are wrong, gives the article away as pure BS
But the consensus narrative has been to downplay these confounding factors and place the emphasis on a coronavirus which has not yet been clinically isolated and proven as a new pathogen in science.
The video is quite informative. You might learn something.
Can you summarize it?
Otherwise it's impossible for anyone to tell whether you read or understood your source.
It's a 3 minute video.
Watch it or stay in the dark.
You can't summarize your own source. That's just pitiful.
You hate to see it
Why should I summarize it for you? You are rude and condescending, and show no pliability. What do I have to gain since I have nothing to prove to you?
We have turned the corner according to fat orange survivor.
So that corner was an explosion of new cases.
Cool.
Waiting the magical disappearance of the virus next.
Next was not given a time frame, eventually can actually take time.
The orange intellectual sloth had no idea this could actually hurt his chances to win as an in bent.
BClinton, George w, Obama all head slapping the political prowess of 4d chess.
With your posting, the bolded is an involuntary response.
You go so low the probability of descending is a given.
Chris telling others they're condescending.
Not the same numbers, and "link got blocked" because fake news.
He just needs an upgrade.
You might draw the sympathy and understanding of others. You might persuade me too.
Sorry I hurt your feelings, you sure have thin skin for someone who trolls and abuses other posters on the reg. What specifically did I say that offended you?
Believe it or not, I pay attention to other viewpoints and I do accept correction from other posters here. If you don't want to persuade anyone else, that's your business.
Monckton Bunkum series by potholer54
Lord Monckton, OMFG its THAT loon.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You mean like an agency that states respect and follow? We could call it the Centers for Disease Control.
You expect 50 different governments to volunteer to follow a central federally driven agency?
Ideologue solutions aren't actually solutions. They are just wishes. As long as there are two parties fighting for power over federal funds, there will always be incentive based directives that states have the freedom to choose (poor states) or ignore (more self sufficient states).
So after all this bloviating about federal responsibility, it really isn't under federal control. Why all the bull ?
Last edited by DMC; 10-30-2020 at 11:04 AM.
Trump is just a ty leader.
His supporters don't want to admit it.
potholer is one of my favs. I am quite familiar, that is how I recogized the name.
Anything that moron touches is almost certainly horse , and should be treated with a mile-high pile of skepticism and fact-checking
More bot-like behavior.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Posting Permissions
