Google Asian attack demographics.
knock on: stipulated as true, what follows?
Google Asian attack demographics.
demands others show their work, declines to show his
It could've easily come from a mutation in a bat in North Korea, a country we don't have a lot of visibility on, and neighbors China.
I'm not saying it did or that it has better odds than have started in China itself, but the point is if we pretend for a second that'd be the case, it wouldn't be odd or strange, and calling it the Chinese virus wouldn't be accurate either.
Not that it really matters where it came from. You can point fingers at the Chinese government for a poor initial response, that really isn't associated to where the virus started.
And it's more than just the Chinese in Asia that love to have these weird food delicacies that can turn extremely dangerous.
But hey, if CC prefers hand waving to making his own point, that's cool with me.
I will continue to point it out, though.
But Trump's policy was to call it that for a year.
I'm sitting on my dock at the lake using my phone. Im not gonna copy paste simple research you are too lazy to do. New York city keeps statistics on Asian crime. Last year, 50% of attacks on asians were by blacks, 10% were by whites although they are a significantly higher percentage of the overall population than blacks.
strawman it is, then
The forum thanks you for posting those stats off the top of your head while sitting on the dock at the lake.
Thanks. Hard to believe you didn't have time to cut and paste a link.
You're right btw, I am too lazy to make your own point for you.
Fauci/Wuhan gain-of-function virus
Oh, so only you can post personal here? Like sancho cucking you? BTW, I have moved up to the back porch if you are still keeping track.
Anti asian sentiment was not an american only problem
Why keep his failed policy?
It's not the weird delicacies it's the handling and preparation.
Anti asian violence may have come from other places but you can't prove it came from the phrase "china virus" I'm not saying that it did or that it had better odds of being than have being started by Trump himself, but the point is if we pretend for one second that'd be the case, it wouldn't be odd or strange and blaming the phrase "china virus" wouldn't be accurate either
See how that works
emphasizing balck on Asian violence was "personal ?"
Whatever makes you feel good about yourself.
Historically outbreaks have been named after the places where they originated.
Suddenly it's taboo.
If it came from Texas it would be called the Texas virus. No one here would give a because you cannot look at someone and know they come from Texas (for the most part). If China wasn't so genous in their racial makeup, saying "Wuhan" wouldn't automatically equate to Han Chinese features.
"suddenly"
uppity minorities not wanting to get killed because whitey wants to vent about a disease
Don't on his narrative.
Historically some of those calls have been wrong* with harm resulting to random people due to scapegoating.If the geographical designation leads to foreseeable harm, why not use a different designation?
(the 1st known outbreak of Spanish Flu was in Kansas.)
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-03-2021 at 08:11 PM.
Why keep the WHO's failed policy?
Probably down the memory hole, but this was called the Wuhan coronavirus early on, even appearing on CNN chyrons. The Wuhan part got dropped over time.
why do you suppose that was?
You tell me. The entire world knows where this originated.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)