dumbasses like Splits getting giddy over some 4chan prank
anon on /pol sends Trump golden shower fan fiction to Rick Wilson. This golden shower story somehow gets into the report from "former British intelligence agent paid to dig dirt on Trump report" that the US intelligence agency found credible enough to present to Obama and Trump. But now even buzzfeed is walking back the released leaked report and citing errors throughout so the entire report may be bull .
Can't really blame Splits when CNN is breaking the story
Thanks
Does this go down as the greatest troll job ever?
And another fesses up to pushing the story last October
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...e-donald-trump
https://medium.com/mtracey/its-only-...6a5#.qamm4n7sa
It’s Only Going To Get Worse: The Trump “Golden Showers” Edition
[IMG]https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*fWK7qWDxovu7BwrqueQ02Q.png[/IMG]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]The Trump “era,” to the extent that it can be defined as an “era,” is going to be characterized by a constant lurching from crisis to crisis. Some of the crises will be purely fabricated — a result of the media’s unrelenting Trump-derived mania, which provides the foundation for the emergence of daily BREAKING NEWS MELTDOWN EMERGENCIES. Some of the crises will be legitimate, but these will probably get relatively lesser attention because of the media’s undying obsession with the trivial, mostly unimportant facets of Trump. The mantra going forward, I’ve postulated, can be thought of as this: “It’s only going to get worse.”[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]As expected, tonight it got worse.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]So, here’s how this story is going to circulate. Journalists such as David Mack of BuzzFeed are going to take snippets of the so-called “Report” and tweet them out. Because Mack is a purported journalist and by dint of that presumably commands some measure of credibility, the fact that he promulgated the excerpt is going to be interpreted by many as a corroboration of the authenticity of the excerpt. Most news consumers aren’t terribly sophisticated. They’ll retweet something without verifying the source, especially when the Tweeter is a BuzzFeed Journalist who is regarded as a credible purveyor of info. Mack sources the excerpt simply to a “Report,” which sounds very Serious to the uninformed.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]Lots of people out there are ready and eager to believe the worst possible stories about Trump. And for some good reason — Trump has done a bunch of bad things, which makes this eagerness understandable. But still, there’s an unremitting appe e in certain quarters for a constant supply of salacious anti-Trump material. People are primed for it and desperate to lap it up uncritically. It’s reminiscent of how an anti-Obama conspiracy underworld developed online, and a bunch of charlatans profited immensely from feeding a never-ending stream of ridiculous, bombastic stories into it — about Obama’s alleged communist sympathies, forged college records, stealth Jihadist affiliations, and related claptrap. The analog is developing around Trump, and the difference this time is far more reputable publications than World Net Daily will be indulging in it.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]In addition to the salacious sex material, the “Report” made available in full by BuzzFeed alleges explicitly that Trump’s “operation” was “directed by” Putin, which would make Trump the textbook definition of a Manchurian Candidate — someone who is not just an unwitting stooge of a foreign power, or who by happenstance advances the interests of that power, but who is a direct agent of the power. If true, this could well be among the most blockbuster events in all U.S. history, potentially superseding 9/11, the JFK Assassination, and Pearl Harbor. It would mean that Trump is taking literal orders from a hostile foreign adversary intent on bringing down the U.S. government from within; again, not just that Trump’s agenda merely aligns with Putin, or that they have mutual goals, but that Trump is an actual agentof Putin. A puppet. Like in the most far-fetched, spy thriller movie sense.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]That’s exactly what people are going to believe as a result of this report and the excerpts that have been selectively disseminated. Is it a false conclusion? Almost certainly. At the very least, it’s drastically unproven. But will the casual news consumer who sees illating excerpts rocketing around the internet know it’s drastically unproven? Will they even care? Is this “fake news”? Is this… real life?[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]David Corn released what he breathlessly promoted as a big exciting EXCLUSIVE back on October 31, likely as a latch-ditch effort to dredge up some dirt on Trump before the election. The story was roundly mocked and scorned, and was obviously based on the flimsiest of information: Corn identified the source solely as a “former spy,” who we now know was the (still unnamed) corporate intelligence person funded by conservative anti-Trump groups during the GOP primary to compile oppo research.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]Corn wanted you to believe that he had exclusive, insider info, but what he really had was a pile of wholly unsubstantiated hogwash that many other operatives and journalists had declined to promulgate because it was so on-its-face unreliable. Corn, however, took the bait. Correctly sensing that publishing a big scintillating story would result in lots of clicks for Mother Jones, he wrote up a summary which looked really damning when you just glanced at the headline or synopsis, but upon even cursory examination fell apart. Now he looks like a total dupe.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]Are we really supposed to believe that the scores of anti-Trump journalists and operatives who were privy to this information declined to run with it prior to the election out of the goodness of their hearts? It would’ve been the story of a lifetime: the scoop that finally brought down Trump. The reason that no one ran with it was because it looked like obvious BS. And now this is being presented by the “Intelligence Community” — whose claims about “Russian Hacking” we’re all supposed to unreservedly trust — as credible? Really? What’s going on? I don’t know, but it’s getting worse. And it will keep getting worse.[/COLOR]
Quite possibly. I can't think of any other time the CIA has been made out to look so inept.
Wasn't this reported as unverified/unsubstantiated? Why were people so quick to jump on this as if it were fact?
Good question.
You'll have to ask Spurminator Splits boutons_deux djohn2oo8 Trill Clinton da_suns_fan Warlord23 ElNono monosylab1k Th'Pusher benefactor
Lol Fake News. Entertaining nonetheless.
For those not familiar with TSA's body of work over the last few months, let's review his methods for a second:
When the DNC emails were leaked, the first thing TSA did was head straight to 4Chan. There he found explosive information - an anonymous FBI agent was spilling all sorts of secrets about Hillary Clinton. TSA found this story credible, so he faithfully kept ST informed about all the bombs s that 4chan kept coming up with - Hillary's various illnesses, her body double, the murder of Seth Rich, FBI rank and file revolting against Comey, Comet Pizza's child abuse etc.
Now when US intelligence agency heads meet with Trump and Obama to brief them on Russia's attempt to influence the incoming Trump administration, TSA once again goes to 4Chan, and voila - he finds posts claiming that the entire thing was dreamed up by 4Chan as a prank. So TSA once again copies these posts on to ST thereby proving that all the allegations are false. I mean, what more proof could one want than when 4Chan affirms it? Job done.
Congratulations on becoming Trump's all-weather semen shield. If you compile some of your greatest hits on this forum and send it to the Kremlin, they'll probably offer you a job immediately.
That's the point. The media has been very careful to report this as unverified. How can a newspaper of TV station verify intelligence claims? The verification will have to be done by US intelligence agencies. These agencies considered the source credible enough to go to the trouble of jointly briefing the outgoing and incoming Presidents. That is the story - what part of that is "fake"? The information itself might be true or false - no media outlet has yet claimed that all of it is true.
Of course, TSA has it all figured out. All the connections between Trump and Russia (Page, Tillerson, Flynn, Manafort) are purely coincidental. 4Chan gloriously trolled the NSA, CIA, FBI and DNI. We should all enjoy the kek, post some memes and praise Pepe.
Don't tag me eater. You are as big of a receptacle for fake news as boutons is except you just catch for the other team.
I can honestly say I think this golden shower story is just too 'out there" to be credible. Not that I think that Trump is some paragon of virtue but rather it's just too conveniently disgusting but still totally unverified and "leaked" right before Trumps press conference today.
I realize the herd in here is dying for this golden shower allegation to be true so let the name calling begin. I still don't believe it.
I believe it. Theres nothing too outlandish in that story and we know for a fact Trump
is a bit of a deviant freak.
dont matter to me. Water under the bridge or in this case. Piss
we had a complete sex lunatic in Clinton for 8 years and did just fine
How do we "know for a fact" Trump is a deviant freak?
Pardon? Yes you did.
So the CIA was approached with the story and bit.
The CIA could not figure out your sequence.
Amazing.
Last edited by pgardn; 01-11-2017 at 08:51 AM.
Exactly.
So exactly what is fake about this news?
The apparent fact that the CIA told Donald and Obama that a British Operative ALLEGEDLY has dirt on him that CANNOT be corroborated? What is fake?
The weird thing is the CIA knows less than Insanity Index and could not figure out the whole thing was planted by 4 chan. And STILL decided to have the meeting to inform both presidents. The real question is why Insanity Index is not running our intelligence services.
Now bouton follows Insanity Index examples.
God what a site...
Classic TSA.
validate me pls.
His comments on that tv show. There was a big deal about it. Grab em by the pussy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
