Reply With Quote
Trump will impeach himself - when Mueller files his report.
If he stays -
why would anyone at any trial in the USA - be held to taking an oath to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
If the SC justice does not - why should they?
He will be impeached - book it.
Trump will impeach himself - when Mueller files his report.
Not only are Repukes celebrating -
so is the Kremlin;
https://investigaterussia.org/media/...augh-messaging
House needs simple majority to pass impeachment
Senate needs 2/3 to convict, and the Dems won't have 2/3 in the Senate, haven't had haven't for many years.
And when Mueller, NYAG presents findings that Trash committed Federal crimes, the Senate Repugs don't care about any laws broken by Repugs, eg, K LYING under oath multiple times.
I can see Trash using the Presidential alert system for his own self-aggrandizing, self-defense, whining purposes, and nobody will stop him.
And no Pres has EVER been convicted by ANY Senate.
I agree 2020 is the real test for Dem's. I'm afraid if the Dem's did re-take the senate they may just be stupid enough to try and impeach Trump, or will just obstruct everything, prompting Trump to say he can't get nothing accomplished because of Dem's, thus fore giving this fool a fighters chance in 2020.
Everyone knew this was inevitable except for you and a couple of delusional LEFTISTS!
an oath!
"Do you - swear to say that you are telling the truth the whole truth - even though you are not and the entire country knows you are not?"
Dsnowflake208
The new Ray Croc where nothingburgers are concerned. Ray Croc of ... lolDsnowflake208
Because the lying under oath arguments require gymnastics for you to make those conclusions.
Actually, it was pretty blatant and there is do ented proof. FBI was not allowed to include this in their sham investigation.
2006 & again in 2018 - lied about the "spying memos" and the "torture" answers he gave under oath.
That would be enough - but he added his yearbook lies, drinking lies,etc
Blatant lying under oath and there is no way to get out of it. Only thing keeping him from a true investigation is the GOP having the majority - but that will change.
I think you will be disappointed - I'd put money on that.
The opposition was also bi-partisan. I don't think it matters if the vote is 51-50 or anything other than a majority for him.
They should obstruct everything Trump tries to do just like McConnell did Obama. McConnell doesn't get to break the senate and then all of a sudden have it a functioning body again when his guy is in the white house and can sign bills. Democrats have to respond in kind to McConnell's bull , he doesn't get to have it both ways.
"if the Dem's did re-take the senate"
2/3 Senate to convict, not gonna happen
No Pres has ever been convicted by Senate.
We misogynists cannot lie, we misogynists really, really care about women, treat them as full human beings
Republican senator lectures women on how not to feel about his support for Kavanaugh
It is “simply not true” that Republican support for Brett Kavanaugh is a sign Republicans don’t care about you. Let’s let the man speak for himself:
“I’m here to talk about the false choice that is being repeated hour after hour after hour on television that this confirmation vote about one vacant seat on the Supreme Court,Somehow the Republicans who talk like they’re principled opponents of Trump always manage to be just as dishonest as the Republicans who openly embrace Trump and his stream of lies.
in that vote we are somehow going to be making a giant binary choice about the
much broader issue of whether we do or do not care about women. That is simply not true,” he said.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
"whether we do or do not care about women. That is simply not true"
which side of the "binary" "or" is "simply not true"
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-07-2018 at 10:00 AM.
Our new SC justice said what goes around comes around...
So...
McConnel basically stated to the color minded red team “I’m gonna stop this black guy”. Then red team got 8 years of a strutting intelligent black man who they could not anger. And it killed them even though he pulled some very red team moves.
Its time for the blue blue team to get their licks in possibly. Disrupt. Delay. But in 2020 they will have the executive branch again imo... What then?
It's True: Misogyny Is at the Heart of Right-Wing Politics
Republicans really do hate women
“When you grow up, I’ll be glad to [speak to you],” Sen. Orrin Hatch snapped at a group of protesters, equating grown women with children who need a scolding.
You needed to go to the cops,” Sen. Lindsey Graham told another protester when she confronted him about her own history of rape, implying that he -- with no information about her situation -- understood her options better than she did.
Sen. Ben Sasse dismissed the protests by women against Kavanaugh as "hysteria" three times during the original confirmation hearing, when the focus was primarily on reproductive rights and before sexual assault became an issue.
Donald Trump, of course, is screeching on Twitter about how the protesters are
"paid" and funded by "Soros," because it is impossible for him imagine that women might actually have minds of their own.
This dismissal of the intelligence or honesty of sexual assault survivors is sadly not surprising.
That is how women's stories of sexual abuse have been discredited since forever.
That's how Christine Blasey Ford's moving testimony against Kavanaugh is being discredited.
This has nothing to do with what's true or most believable or most backed by evidence.
It's about asserting that women's voices have no value, no matter what they're saying or how true it is.
Christine Blasey Ford's testimony was more of the same. She had a soft, girlish voice and a winsome demeanor, completely without guile. She was vulnerable, not angry.
She came across as someone who really believed that if the Senate knew the truth, it would do the right thing.
Now she's getting smeared as a liar or a crazy woman and lost anyway.
Kate Manne disputes the naive conception of misogyny as some sort of knee-jerk hatred of women. Instead, she argues that
it's about the policing of women.
A misogynist is perfectly happy with women if they behave the way he wants them to, by being servile and pleasing.
But when women start to resist their assigned role and start insisting on respect, justice and equality, the fangs will come out.
But when women started saying no to him and started speaking up, he got red-faced, screaming and self-pitying. Republicans in Congress were so deeply moved by his performance because they, too, cannot believe these women who think they have a right to speak out.
That was why it had to be Brett Kavanaugh,
rather than subs uting in some other right-wing judge with equivalent qualifications and fewer allegations of drunken sexual assault.
Because
Republican misogyny is not an act, and the party and its followers eagerly seized this opportunity to put women in their place.
https://www.alternet.org/its-true-mi...-wing-politics
Why did the Repugs stick with K, when Federalist Society had dozens other oligarchy- s-in-waiting?
Because K and his attempted-rape-is-ok-with-Repugs was a baseball bat to beat ALL women with.
This is the way the senate is going to be for a long time. It's the stable equilibrium once obstructionism became normalized by eight years of McConnell. The Democrats rightfully reply in kind. Then the Republicans will do the same once the Democrats take over at whatever point that will be. And so on. There is no putting that genie back in the bottle once McConnell unleashed it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
