Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 43 of 43
  1. #26
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    50,672
    The Norpoth computer model has only been wrong twice when reviewing who would be president going over the last 108 years. The two times it was wrong was George w Bush and John Kennedy, two men who had large followings and the computer had them losing by a narrow margin. The computer has Trump with a 91% probability of being re-elected. The model predicted Trump being elected in 2016. This is a computer. It has no agenda, no fudging, no lies. It can only analyze and facts with a factual determination.

    I don't think Trump cares one way or another about the polls that have been proven to be increasingly unreliable.
    It only knows what variables humans put in it. Sort of the problem with such predictions is that they really do miss things that happen outside the model that affect it.

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,429
    The Norpoth computer model has only been wrong twice when reviewing who would be president going over the last 108 years. The two times it was wrong was George w Bush and John Kennedy, two men who had large followings and the computer had them losing by a narrow margin. The computer has Trump with a 91% probability of being re-elected. The model predicted Trump being elected in 2016. This is a computer. It has no agenda, no fudging, no lies. It can only analyze facts with a factual determination.

    I don't think Trump cares one way or another about the polls that have been proven to be increasingly unreliable.
    LOL

    That's exactly why this is a flawed system. Sure, it will give you precise results as long as you input the exact numbers in. It doesn't account for human behavior. Computers cant predict how people will vote.

    Such a reach.

  3. #28
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    9,877


    moral of the story;

    watch the answer the fiance gives in the future to the same question?

    Do black lives matter?

    Fiance: “ uh ...er... yes Black lives matter!”




  4. #29
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    LOL

    That's exactly why this is a flawed system. Sure, it will give you precise results as long as you input the exact numbers in. It doesn't account for human behavior. Computers cant predict how people will vote.

    Such a reach.
    You going to ELE yourself again? Amazing how you do that and yet you're still here.

  5. #30
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,429
    You going to ELE yourself again? Amazing how you do that and yet you're still here.
    Why are you so concerned about me? You'd find a way to stalk me in person if I ever leave this place.

    Am I wrong?

  6. #31
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Why are you so concerned about me? You'd find a way to stalk me in person if I ever leave this place.

    Am I wrong?
    I asked you a simple question. I noticed that you made an ELE bet and welched on it. Are you a dishonest person who feels the need to puff up your chest and bet you cannot and don't plan to deliver when you lose? Just trying to get the lay of the land here.

  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,429
    I asked you a simple question. I noticed that you made an ELE bet and welched on it. Are you a dishonest person who feels the need to puff up your chest and bet you cannot and don't plan to deliver when you lose? Just trying to get the lay of the land here.
    What was the bet I lost?

  8. #33
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,029
    You don’t pay your loses. Just keep the money you owe me.

  9. #34
    "The ball don't lie." dbestpro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    10,259
    LOL

    That's exactly why this is a flawed system. Sure, it will give you precise results as long as you input the exact numbers in. It doesn't account for human behavior. Computers cant predict how people will vote.

    Such a reach.
    The point is the data entered is the correct data to get the correct results 25 out of 27 times almost got the last two. It has been a predictive model since Bill Clinton. Name a poll that comes close. Name a poll that is half as good or even one fourth. It absolutely calculates for behavior through the analysis of data during the primaries. It is absolute genius when you look at it. It nailed Obama getting elected both times.

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,429
    The point is the data entered is the correct data to get the correct results 25 out of 27 times almost got the last two. It has been a predictive model since Bill Clinton. Name a poll that comes close. Name a poll that is half as good or even one fourth. It absolutely calculates for behavior through the analysis of data during the primaries. It is absolute genius when you look at it. It nailed Obama getting elected both times.
    By their own admission this model is based off what happened early in the primaries where Biden was given for dead in the first 3 contests which he came in 4th, 5th and 2nd respectively.

    Trump had an unopposed primary season. But if you want to bank on this model for a glimmer of hope, go for it.

  11. #36
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    144,590
    You're going to walk around cities in a group yelling racial epithets and waving guns around?

    Good luck.

  12. #37
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    20,548
    What was the bet I lost?
    You lost an ELE bet to me because you didn’t know the difference between “on” and “from”.

  13. #38
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,429
    The daily mail. That's UK's version of TMZ for us.

  14. #39
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,429
    You lost an ELE bet to me because you didn’t know the difference between “on” and “from”.
    Not really. You misunderstood.

    That's your problem, not mine you degenerate gambler.

  15. #40
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    17,532
    The daily mail. That's UK's version of TMZ for us.
    Are you accusing them of lying like TMZ did with Kobe's death?

    Should be alarming people need to head to such sources because the mainstream news sources are preoccupied discussing Trump's SAT scores

  16. #41
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    21,198
    The Norpoth computer model has only been wrong twice when reviewing who would be president going over the last 108 years. The two times it was wrong was George w Bush and John Kennedy, two men who had large followings and the computer had them losing by a narrow margin. The computer has Trump with a 91% probability of being re-elected. The model predicted Trump being elected in 2016. This is a computer. It has no agenda, no fudging, no lies. It can only analyze facts with a factual determination.

    I don't think Trump cares one way or another about the polls that have been proven to be increasingly unreliable.
    It’s about to be wrong a third time.

  17. #42
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    38,143
    Another Chumpette fapping thread.
    Start another Blake Reck thread pervy.

  18. #43
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    38,143
    The Norpoth computer model has only been wrong twice when reviewing who would be president going over the last 108 years. The two times it was wrong was George w Bush and John Kennedy, two men who had large followings and the computer had them losing by a narrow margin. The computer has Trump with a 91% probability of being re-elected. The model predicted Trump being elected in 2016. This is a computer. It has no agenda, no fudging, no lies. It can only analyze facts with a factual determination.

    I don't think Trump cares one way or another about the polls that have been proven to be increasingly unreliable.
    When was the program written?

    Link, thanks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •