and 70m is a load of votes but Trump still lost. The majority of the money from that group goes to the Dems, so if someone wishes to call that company immoral, they need to start looking at who owns it.
and 70m is a load of votes but Trump still lost. The majority of the money from that group goes to the Dems, so if someone wishes to call that company immoral, they need to start looking at who owns it.
Got a shareholder list?
pettifogging like a frippet, and the tomfoolery
hurr durr Google
So no, you don't have a shareholder list.
Now say you're ignoring me.
2nd largest shareholder gave 70% to Dems.
chop chop chirp chirp
70% of what?
His own donations?
Let's see your list.
Chirpderper David not knowing how major shareholding works
DMC folds
Now he's going to flood the zone with .
David says... go find something on Google and run back.
No?
David says you fold.
You never had a list.
All you had to say was no.
But you had to meltdown again.
"David"
That's how everyone can tell u mad.
You can't even admit I schooled you on infer vs. imply.
You're brittle.
I thought it has been flagged already but I may be wrong.
I looked up a bit more on this topic tbh... What I understood is the following, they built up a plan in 2019 to sell automatically shares when their value pass a threshold. The day of the announcement share went up 7% putting the value above the said threshold triggering the sale. Looking up that way it does not seem there is any manipulation. What probably happened tho is Pfizer announcing in a rush to anticipate Moderna annoucement, they probably knew that their vacine was more promising, announcing a 90% positive result after Moderna 94% would mean share value decrease rather than increase.
One thing is for sure in terms of communication pfizer and his ceo could have managed a lot better
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)