Reply With Quote
It was obvious they knew he was lying in the January interview since the FBI brought up Dolan first, but here is first confirmed do entation I can find of them knowing he lied.
2/9/17
I'm sitting here watching you get clowned. It's cheap entertainment.You sat in the corner and watched someone else do the work. Seems to be a habit with you
It was obvious they knew he was lying in the January interview since the FBI brought up Dolan first, but here is first confirmed do entation I can find of them knowing he lied.
2/9/17
There are so many cuck jokes to go with here I don't know where to start
nice, but the contradictions noted here are relating to russian intelligence/security services, not Dolan aka PR Executive-1It was obvious they knew he was lying in the January interview since the FBI brought up Dolan first, but here is first confirmed do entation I can find of them knowing he lied.
2/9/17
either way, if Mueller didnt rely on the Dossier for his report, why would he have done a deep dive into the background of the dossier?
I'm pointing out the contradiction of your own claim. You built that giant straw, but you can't defend it.
The fact that you were quick to move into personal attacks just simply underscores the point.
You just asked when they knew he was lying. You were just shown they knew at least by February 2017. Now you move the goalpost and try and make it a lie about a specific person?
2)any matters that arose or may arise directly from that investigation"(the Investigation)."either way, if Mueller didnt rely on the Dossier for his report, why would he have done a deep dive into the background of the dossier?
perhaps his painstakingly acquired familiarity with the Steele dossier and his meticulous command of the minutiae of pleading in this case, will be vindicated by a legal outcome at some point. I wouldn't rule out HRC being thrown in prison after the GOP unifies government in 2024.
That was never my claim, there is nothing to defend.
That's not the Mueller report, that was the OIG report (which basically means you agree with SR21 that was his realm).Mueller scope memo---"(1) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump. "2)any matters that arose or may arise directly from that investigation"(the Investigation)."
We know Mueller investigated the dossier because in his report he debunked Steele and gave all the dossier fans blue balls. If Mueller and his team were competent and followed the scope memo and investigated any matter that arose from investigating the dossier Mueller and team would have investigated the sources behind the dossier and revealed the entire hoax came from Clinton's campaign. Again, it was either incompetence or cover up.
"bUt ThE RePOrT wAs DIscLOseD aS opPO rEsEArcH"
As more fully described in Chapter Five, based
upon the information known to the FBI in October 2016,
the first application contained the following seven
significant inaccuracies and omissions:
1.Omitted information the FBI had obtained from
another U.S. government agency detailing its
prior relationship with Page, including that Page
had been approved as an "operational contact"
for the other agency from 2008 to 2013, and
that Page had provided information to the other
agency concerning his prior contacts with certain
Russian intelligence officers, one of which
overlapped with facts asserted in the FISA
application;
2.Included a source characterization statement
asserting that Steele's prior reporting had been
"corroborated and used in criminal proceedings,"which overstated the significance of Steele's past
reporting and was not approved by Steele's
handling agent, as required by the Woods
Procedures;
3. Omitted information relevant to the reliability of
Person 1, a key Steele sub-source (who was
attributed with providing the information in
Report 95 and some of the information in
Reports 80 and 102 relied upon in the
application), namely that ( 1) Steele himself told
members of the Crossfire Hurricane team that
Person 1 was a "boaster" and an "egoist" and
" may engage in some embellishment" and (2)
the FBI had opened a counterintelligence
investigation on Person 1 a few days before the
FISA application was filed;
4. Asserted that the FBI had assessed that Steele
did not directly provide to the press information
in the September 23 Yahoo News article based
on the premise that Steele had told the FBI that
he only shared his election-related research with
the FBI and Fusion GPS, his client; t his premise
was incorrect and contradicted by do entation
in the Woods File-Steele had told the FBI that
he also gave his information to the State
Department;
5. Omitted Papadopou los's consensually monitored
statements to an FBI CHS in September 2016
denying that anyone associated wit h the Trum p
campaign was collaborating with Russia or with
outside groups like Wikileaks in the release of
emails;
6. Omitted Page 's consensually monitored
statements to an FBI CHS in August 2016 that
Page had " literally never met" or "said one word
to" Paul Manafort and that Manafort had not
responded to any of Page's emails; if true, those
statements were in t ension with cla ims in Report
95 that Page was participating in a conspiracy
with Russia by acting as an intermediary for
Manafort on behalf of the Trump campaign; and
7. Included Page's consensually monitored
statements to an FBI CHS in October 2016 that
the FBI believed supported its theory that Page
was an agent of Russia but omitted other
statements Page made that were inconsistent
with its theory, includ ing denying having met
with Sechin and Divyekin, or even knowing who
Divyekin was; if true, those statements
co ntradicted the claims in Report 94 that Page had met secretly with Sechin and Divyekin about
future cooperation with Russia and shared
derogatory information about ca ndidate Clinton.
None of these inaccuracies and omissions were
brought to the attention of OI before the last FISA
application was filed in June 2017. Consequently, these
failures were repeated in all three r enewal applications.
Further, as we discuss lat er, we identified 10 additional
significant errors in the renewal applications.
https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
And everybody knew about it being oppo research back in 2017, including you... both Mueller and the OIG reports came out roughly two years after this post:
So what makes you think they were hiding that?
You know people can see earlier posts, right? Like:
^^^ Here you are defending a claim that was never your claim? rofl
No that's the OIG report I put the link there. I included that to show how silly your reference was to it being disclosed as oppo research.That's not the Mueller report, that was the OIG report (which basically means you agree with SR21 that was his realm).
And everybody knew about it being oppo research back in 2017, including you... both Mueller and the OIG reports came out roughly two years after this post:
So what makes you think they were hiding that?
There are so many cuck jokes to go with here I don't know where to start
Here you are arguing against a claim I never made.
You made the same mistake sr21 did and confused the FBI and Mueller.
I explained that to sr21 already in the thread.
The FBI ran the questioning of Danchenko, not Mueller. I said the FBI knew Danchenko was lying. Questioning happened before Mueller was even appointed.
dont know about it being a goalpost move considering all your posts about the lies related to dolan dolan dolan. its you that moved the goalpost off dolanYou just asked when they knew he was lying. You were just shown they knew at least by February 2017. Now you move the goalpost and try and make it a lie about a specific person?
2)any matters that arose or may arise directly from that investigation"(the Investigation)."
did a deep dive into the background of the dossier necessarily arise from the investigation if he didnt think the dossier was material too the interference/collusion aspect of his investigation?
your inference that it SHOULD have been part of mueller's report relies on a few separate assumptions being true. thats not moving goalposts to ensure those assumptions were satisfied
Of course the dossier was material to the Mueller investigation, Mueller basically debunked it point by point. Had Mueller's team been competent they would have gone further as instructed by Rosenstein and investigated any matters that arose (Steele's sources) directly from that investigation.dont know about it being a goalpost move considering all your posts about the lies related to dolan dolan dolan. its you that moved the goalpost off dolan
did a deep dive into the background of the dossier necessarily arise from the investigation if he didnt think the dossier was material too the interference/collusion aspect of his investigation?
your inference that it SHOULD have been part of mueller's report relies on a few separate assumptions being true. thats not moving goalposts to ensure those assumptions were satisfied
So Mueller didn't rely on the dossier.
Many posters seem to think otherwise, for some reason.
nor did the fbi rely on the dossier
it was 1 of hundreds of pieces of evidence - ALL of which they considered and weighed and then opened the investigation that the IG concluded was properly predicated
Not sure how I missed disgraced and terminated ex-FBI Peter Strzok going on the biggest hoax dossier pusher of all's show
Brookings fellow, Comey BFF, and hoax dossier pusher Benjamin Wittes interviewing disgraced and terminated ex-FBI Peter Strzok about former Brookings fellow hoax pusher Igor Dashenko
This is almost as bad as Clinton operative George Stephanapolous giving disgraced hoax dossier pusher Christopher Steele a prime time interview to try and clear his name
hater
Where did all the Schiff stans go
We're just chillin' outside Air Force One with Q composing some tippy top tweets.
Where did all the Schiff stans go
the black background with the serious floating head
That report is two yours older than your own and everybody else's knowledge it was oppo research. Why are you arguing this point again?
TDSA still working overtime on this
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions