You weren't specific
I don't do boxed in scenarios where your opinion is followed up with a conclusion and then a "yes or no" attached that assumed the premises are all true.
You weren't specific
At least you explain why he triggered you. Progress.
He triggers laughter in me. He put me on ignore because I corrected his galaxy brain on the usage of imply and infer. His ego couldn't take it.
Some of that is true, some of that is narrative.
Typical tactic of the left/center-left here...
Left wing Poster A makes sloppy, broad brush comment, gets called out.
Left wing Poster A makes a sloppy retort in defense
Left wing Poster B shows up and makes a different defense, gets called out for the original claim
Left wing Poster B denies ever making the original claim, even though poster B is defending it
Left wing Poster C shows up, defends original claim, defends poster B
Left wing Poster C gets called out, denies caring about the original claim, denies supporting Poster B, still wants a back and forth about the original claim.
Left wing Poster D shows up, posts a strawman meme about the attack on the original claim
The responses pretty much cease because of the web of that's developed,
Left wing Poster E calls fold
rinse and repeat
1) Left winger starts discussion on some topic.
2) DMC says "Whaddaboutdis?" and argues about the personal lives of posters for two weeks.
You're lazy and dishonest, no skin off my butt.
throw the damn towel tbh
You could set him in there on your Ignore group, Winester.
tee, hee.
I just asked your opinion about whether Trump's post-election shenanigans are consistent with the norms of representative democracy as you conceive it.
Straight opinion, no true/false determinations necessary unless you choose to take it up point by point.
Last edited by Winehole23; 06-03-2021 at 12:29 PM.
I’ll bet you don’t see any irony in this post.
If you dispute the pemises, why not say that?
If that was the case here, which premises struck you as bad?
Why aren’t you capable of just admitting you’re a party of trump guy? You vote for all of them. You didn’t even vote against trump.
why would continue to pretend you’re not a supporter
LOL, you got punked into switching your schtick.
LOL, blue derp flag waving.
Wiping my ass with your scalp rn.
Just stop. You're a clown. NO ONE likes you.
You are fighting with derp for most sad piece of on this board.
You're so sad, my words are making you walk your -schtick back miles.
Hardly. You monologued first.
If the 3 branches are intact, then the judicial system should be able to handle whatever bull legislation is pushed. The supreme court will decide on the cons utionality of it. You didn't seem to mind with the Bill of Rights.
"Anything goes as long as I get my way" sets a precedence, you've nary room to wine from your hole about it when it bites you in the ass.
.
Last edited by Winehole23; 06-03-2021 at 01:34 PM.
I'll bet you don't see your own feet.
Explain what the "norms" are.
Whatever your conception of them may be. If it's any easier, you can just say whether you think DJT's post election shenanigans, including his attempts to corrupt public officials, were consistent with representative republicanism.
Last edited by Winehole23; 06-03-2021 at 01:42 PM.
Lol pretending to be ignorant of the meaning of norms
Why did you delete your post?
What do you mean "consistent with"?
Did the 3 branches of the federal government fall by the wayside?
Based on the history of this country, Watergate, Whitewater, all the lying, selling nuclear secrets, paying to whack a POTUS and a civil rights leader, and all the other ty things our leaders have done, I'd say it might have upped the ante but it didn't change the game.
For example, there used to be a norm not to challenge lost elections frivolously or otherwise, because doing so impairs confidence in US elections and might cause violence and unrest.
Though Trump was within his rights to exhaust legal recourses, by ignoring the norm and filing dozens of evidence free challenges and insisting he won, he undermined a fair election and fomented an attack on the US government.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)