Re s circling the wagons.
How many WWII deaths is it?
Derp and karrin worked very hard to earn derp and karrin
Re s circling the wagons.
How many WWII deaths is it?
^We might just reach that by Christmas. It's no Benghazi, of course...
Half a WWII in seven months, deathwise, not counting chronic complications of the disease.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...ualties_of_war
another DarrinS insta-self-pwnt.
the only ratios higher on this board are tholdren and Spurtacular, tbh.
fck...
Even if our population is much larger now.
Half a million at least by March 2021. Could have been worse, tbh.
Could be worse, we don't know.
How many black deaths is it? At least that's a disease.
Why are you guys so moronic?
Why are you making whatever argument you can to minimize the significance of 190k dead Americans? It's really bizarre given how much 4 dead Americans in Benghazi was the end of the ing world to Republicans 8 years ago.
4 dead Americans in Benghazi didn't die of a disease.
Why this bizarre comparison?
You're not makng sense. Are you sure that's what you meant to say?
So you’re saying that since they died from violence and not a disease, the 4 dead in Benghazi required 10 different congressional investigations and countless hours of testimony, but we should just charge the 190k COVID deaths to the game and say it?
The comparison isn’t bizarre, what’s bizarre is that you find those 4 lives that were lost under Obama to require more attention and scrutiny than these 190k lives lost under Trump.
There were also 2 Ebola deaths under Obama, and Republicans were calling for his dead. If those were just “deaths from disease” why did they matter so much?
Black plague is caused by bacterium, but if we go this route, we have more deaths than 2 Great Plagues of London of 1665 or more deaths than all Yellow Fever deaths of the late 1800s in South America and sub-Sharan Africa, combined.
Or, we have an equivalent of all motor vehicle fatalities in USA from 2014 thru 2018 crammed into a couple of months. So it is safer to drive a car than get covid.
his talking about the bubonic plague
much higher mortality rate for the bubonic plague, to be sure. that was what, 60-80% mortality?
Copy and paste from CDC site:
"In the pre-antibiotic era (1900 through 1941), mortality among those infected with plague in the United States was 66%. Antibiotics greatly reduced mortality, and by 1990-2010 overall mortality had decreased to 11%. Plague can still be fatal despite effective antibiotics, though it is lower for bubonic plague cases than for septicemic or pneumonic plague cases. It is hard to assess the mortality rate of plague in developing countries, as relatively few cases are reliably diagnosed and reported to health authorities. WHO cites mortality rates of 8–10%, however some studies (WHO, 2004) suggest that mortality may be much higher in some plague endemic areas."
https://www.cdc.gov/plague/faq/index.html
The 14th Century plague was pre- antibiotic, no?
Correct. Just chicken soup for you!
Absolute numbers that high count for me, not for you?
Update (2 September 2020):::
Trump's Corona Plague dead: 189,875+
Total Deaths Today: 975 (243 Benghazis, 1 Ebola outbreak & 1 Seth Rich murder)
South Korea dead: 324
Regular Flu dead: 23+k
Spanish Flu dead: 275k
Obama's H1N1 Flu dead: 12.5k
Let us proceed...
Lol wrong
You're still on my ignore list Foldren. I'm not reading whatever your reply says.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)