Interesting take. Sad we'll never actually know since that particular bird didn't have a black box or anything recording the situation.
Kome did own his own copter according to a radio commentator. Perhaps his own copter was not large enough to carry 9?
Same show said there is advanced electronics that could have avoided mountain. Don't remember if that was radar that would have given pilot more info on how close bird was to mountain or an automatic fly feature like auto breaking on cars. I thought he said Komes copter did have this advanced feature. (My memory is not perfect but pretty sure this is what show said. OTOH you'd think mainstream would have been publicizing this so TIFWIW.)
We'll probably never know as the audio won't be released but I wonder who's call it was to go ahead in the weather.
Interesting take. Sad we'll never actually know since that particular bird didn't have a black box or anything recording the situation.
Kobe Bryant’s helicopter was missing a warning system that could have alerted pilot to hillside
https://www.latimes.com/california/s...rs-face-arrest
Homendy said her agency had recommended that the Federal Aviation Administration 16 years ago require that all choppers carrying six or more passengers be equipped with a terrain awareness and warning system, adding that the FAA has “failed to act” on the proposal. Because the FAA didn’t follow the recommendation, the chopper that crashed Sunday was not legally required to have the system.
There are systems that show actual terrain and give warnings, but they are annoying as for VFR pilots and cannot be silenced.
That's the sentiment I got reading up on helicopter pilots regarding this...
I would not be surprised to learn that the helicopter experienced mechanical issues during the sudden al ude increase that forced the pilot to drop al ude, and knowing what was ahead forced him to come about as quickly as possible to try to create somewhat of a glide slope. It obviously didn't work, but by all my understanding, this pilot was a stud. I'd be surprised to learn it was actually pilot error. The blades seem to be in line with the flight path, almost indicating they were not spinning fast at the time of impact else they should be scattered in a wider area (granted I haven't seen the entire debris field).
That's the summation that video posted earlier was getting at. I have flown in a few copters over the year, but I wouldn't be surprised if you're right.
DMC trying to big time with his knowledge.
The pilot made a risky nose-up maneuver when he saw he was low, then lost control of the helicopter.
All you knowledge people.
No complaints coming from here, bruh.
Ankle biting. You're an idiot.
He actually owned the chopper until he retired from playing, then sold it to the company. He then leased it as needed.
Ah, thanks for the clarification.
Spatial disorientation with the cloud cover and lack of visual cues, maybe? IIRC the pilot wasn't flying by instrument; he was attempting to use landmarks on the ground. Also, wouldn't a relatively small debris field just mean that the coptor was intact when it hit the ground?
Flying through mountains in a dense fog is like rolling trick dice where every side is a 1. It suddenly becomes much more likely that you'll get a "bad roll."
These car comparisons are invalid for two reasons.
1) With cars, the biggest threat to you is other drivers. If you drive through fog, you still have the benefit of driving on roads with street lights, stop lights, and clearly painted lanes. The only reason you're more likely to die in a car is because there are so many other drivers on the road, and one of them is bound to make a mistake at some point. If there were millions of aircrafts flying around in a densely packed area, you'd be more likely to die in those.
2) If you blow out a tire or something, you still have a decent chance to live. If something critical fails in an aircraft, your chance of dying es dramatically because you're a land-dwelling creature in the sky where you're not meant to be. Technology is literally keeping you alive every moment you're in the sky.
So even though cars cause more deaths in the context of normal cir stances, aircrafts are still more inherently dangerous, especially under the conditions that led to Kobe's death.
Mos def. In the air there is nor room for error. It's almost the first reaction when you hear of a plane crash/helicopter crash is "Did anyone survive?" that tends to be the sentiment when one of those happens. Good points.
Like the crash that killed all those kids on that team in Canada not long ago. ed up happens. It's still ed up.
He probably got cheap rides as part of the deal. I can't see Kobe spending $15K a pop each ride to do such mundane things as go to a youth basketball game.
Why not? Immaterial cost. Rounding error.
Okay, I can; but I still doubt it. His cash flow changed in his post playing days.
I’ve never seen that clip before. GP going full re
all you knowledge people tell me
Do Al Jefferson got the many players that Tim Duncan have on his team?
Who would you take, Tim Duncan or Al Jefferson?
Tim Duncan because he’s the better player, but that’s not the point
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)