The flaw in your analysis: odds for social groups are not the same. if your social group includes more unvaxxed, you are way more likely to know someone. Given that vaccinations have become political that means Republi s.
I hope he puts as much effort into being a good father.
The flaw in your analysis: odds for social groups are not the same. if your social group includes more unvaxxed, you are way more likely to know someone. Given that vaccinations have become political that means Republi s.
1. It was mid February, not January
2. He does not believe the snow was fake... he's just in California not Texas, and it never snows in most of California
3. He does not believe Cosmoron's conspiracy theories like the moon landing is fake, the earth is flat, 9/11 was a deep state job, etc
He definitely believes Democrats caused the snow with a weather machine.
He absolutely believes the deep state is behind the 9/11 attacks.
It's not a flaw. The odds are there when you consider the entire country (which was considered in the comment I responded to). You can break risks down even further based on age and comorbidities, but overall the odds are pretty low that someone close to you died of COVID. While the odds increase for a specific subgroup, the odds decrease for another subgroup.
Which Republi s here have lost loved ones to COVID?
that's ridiculous. It was a once in 30 year event that it happened for a whole week, but, it snows/ices in Texas at least once every couple years or so on average. My first semester at UNT was known as "icepocalypse"... after a very hot late 2013 summer, a cool fall, a few random hot days in early November and a cold rest of November, the whole campus iced over for a week in early December which happened to coincide with Finals week and a whole lot of up. I ended up having to take all my finals that semester either online or in the ing basketball arena. Still made straight A's, though. Fell down a flight of icy stairs and cut my leg at one point. It was crazy!
derp has biographers on this site.
You don't realize you're one of them.
DerpMC unironically making this meme his entire worldview
why do you always feel compelled to tell us these long-winded random stories in your life where you find some way to pat yourself on the back?
Far, far down the line from the 5-year shadows like you, a guy who came out of retirement to get in on the derp sweepstakes and a Chinamen who melted down and tried quitting him a few times.
At least he tried. You couldn't. It took a group effort to pressure you to stop.
You're also a ChumpDumper biographer.
"pressure"
DMC’s understudy is really hoping his mentor notices him today
Because that's what (he) needs. You can't see that because [you] don't need that.
He absolutely believed the snow was fake.
He then shifted to faked by a non-existant weather machine.
Agreed. That is the level of reasoning of your "ally".He definitely believes Democrats caused the snow with a weather machine.
I don't think he actually believes that. Ducks, maybe. Spurtacular is smarter than that.
He isn't.
He thinks 9-11 was an inside job, the towers were brought down by controlled demolition, and there was no plane that hit the pentagon.
He was convinced that somehow Donald Trump was going to be reinstated. and fooled himself on that regard multiple times over.
If he was truly a good father, he should have abandoned his family.
The 9/11 theories are stupid. It was definitely an Islamic job, Taliban-Al Qaeda, and one Joseph Robinette Biden just brought them back to August 2001 strength.
Trump reinstated after Biden was inaugurated also wasn't possible, it had never been done in US history. The window to complete audits was Nov-Dec 2020. But they didn't get conclusive evidence in time, so the "play stood". sort of like in football, the call on the field stood and didn't get overturned even if there was some evidence but there wasn't enough to overturn the ruling on the court/field.
For the record... I was pretty sure by mid day Wednesday Nov. 4th that Biden was going to be in. I think what pissed off the GOP and the right wasn't so much Trump losing, but the way it happened... not just the Dems, but the people in charge of the ballots should be fired and there needs to be mass federal regulation on the timing of results coming in. Look at Florida, Texas and a few others... picture perfect example of how election night reporting should be done in all 50 states + DC. On time and on target. It should be federal law that a winner should be declared in each and every state by no later than midnight local time for each state... meaning all the mail ins and early votes should be counted AHEAD of time, not at the end. That will provide fair transparency. It's OK if the news networks don't start releasing the %'s and vote tallies until the polls close. I am OK with that. I am NOT okay with mass amounts of votes (i.e., greater than 1% in any state) being not counted until the Wednesday after election night or later.
America deserves to know who the president will be by no later than midnight on Election Night. In this previous case, that would have been Trump due to the lack of counted late mail in votes... some of them legitimate, some of them questionable... as Trump would have carried GA, MI, WI, NC and PA, while Biden would have only carried AZ, MN and NV out of the "swing" states. Would have been well over 270 for Trump. Regardless of whether Biden legitimately won the election is irrelevant... it is 50/50, nobody will ever truly know. But the process itself was bungled, there is no doubt about that... it cannot be questioned.
Bottom line: there needs to be federal law enacted that all mail in and early voting ballots for each state be counted by no later than the morning of election day. Therefore, that would provide more than adequate time to relay this information to the press by election night when the polls close, and ample time for the "day of" election day votes to be counted immediately as they come in.
Trump fooled himself too in Spurtacular's defense.
Explain Building/Tower 7 imploding like that.
Chop/chop.
Explain the implosion of Building/Tower 7.
Explain the incentive the deep state would have had to take down building 7?
The collapse of that structure was a bit odd, but it was an unpopulated, deserted building. Most likely a collapse caused by the heat and smoke from the twin tower collapses. But what incentive would the deep state have to destroy that building too? The short answer is none.
A lot of fresh insurance was arranged on those buildings not too long before they fell.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)