Interesting. I would imagine that the Spurs would tell Danny that they'll match most offers. "Match" here is used loosely, I know that Danny is unrestricted. I also think that if the Spurs and Mavs offer identical contracts, Danny would take the Spurs' offer.
he's gone tbh
Of course they are. They are always going after the Spurs scraps.
They are probably also interested in Tim, Tony, Mills, Splitter, Manu, Beli, Baynes, Diaw, Bonner, McGrady, and Bogans.
Nobody wants Errors.
Well at least the spurs now know the market for him
didnt they blow their load on parsons?
They have about 35+ million to spend if they wanted.
I have a bad feeling Dmarre Carroll is going to get a big deal, which is also going to set Danny's price above what the Spurs are willing to pay.
draft thread tbh
No.
If the range on Danny is $10-$12m, Spurs gotta retain him. If it gets crazy like 5/$75, that'll be tough.
Here's a hypothetical: Danny goes to the Spurs FO and says "Dallas offered me __ years and $__ million. I'll stay if you offer the same thing."
What numbers cause the Spurs to say no? 4 and 60?
And just to make sure, only the Spurs can give Danny a 5th year, right? Would that affect the Spurs' ability to offer other 5-year contracts down the road? I know that giving Kawhi 5 years doesn't prevent the Spurs from offering Danny 5 also.
You don't give Danny Green that kind of contract. If he's offered that elsewhere, he's gone. And it will be a terrible contract for whoever pays him that.
5 years sounds like a long time for Green at big money. Makes it borderline imo. I think it's greater than 50/50 that we'd look back and think what a bad contract Spurs are locked into.
Doubt he goes there. Green will go to a contender.
5 years for Danny at a high price? He'll be 33 last year of that contract. DG may still be the shooter he is, but he won't be the defender. I'd give Danny a 4 year contract tops, preferably a three.
To your questions, I think they say no at 4 and 60. They probably say no at 4 and 50.
However, this offseason, our guard depth could really collapse if Manu retires, Green, Belli, and Joseph all leave. So, the FO may be (for once) willing to overpay. If so, I hope Danny is the one they choose to give the extra cash.
4 years at 44 is a good deal.
Unless it's an insane offer he will stay
I believe only one player at a time can get the 5 year deal.
Ah. Mavs are getting LA and now Green from the Spurs..
But honestly, Danny deserves to grab that Green right now. After his finals performances, I wouldn't be mad if he chased the money rather than do the "Spursy" thing and re-sign for less money.
I really hope we keep him. If he gets too expensive though I'd send him to Cleveland for the Hayward contract, that pick, and filler. That should help in the LMA pursuits I'd imagine.
Danny would be tough to replace. Would have to be done with some combo of draft and vet.
That would be a great deal
robinson was tough to replace
we got a player named duncan
robinson was tough to replace
we got a player named duncan
Just remember if Spurs don't keep Danny it was because of Parker.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
