Reply With Quote
Inb4 the shameless justifying / rationalizing.
This been out for a few days now; I'm surprised a concerned Chumpette didn't step up and post it.
Inb4 the shameless justifying / rationalizing.
What part of the contract and or rules are you unsure of, derp?
..in violation of rules and conditions. Their game, their rules.
And it appears as if they were dead on with their assesment of her poor character as the next thing she did was lash out and insult the people in her email reply.Stupid .
Tell us about how she broke the rules and conditions, eunuch.What part of the contract and or rules are you unsure of, derp?
..in violation of rules and conditions. Their game, their rules.
And it appears as if they were dead on with their assesment of her poor character as the next thing she did was lash out and insult the people in her email reply.
Also, tell us how she was "dead on" and how she is supposed to have "poor character".
Be specific.
It's all in the letters you didn't read.
lol derp
Use your words, Chump.
Don't have to; they already did.
Try reading them.
Are these the legitimate viewpoints we're talking about here?
Holy she's hot. Does she post here?Are these the legitimate viewpoints we're talking about here?
That's Donald Jr. She's the one on the left.
Sounds like legitimate viewpoints to have. For which statement do you take umbrage?Are these the legitimate viewpoints we're talking about here?
close-ups are not her friend.
Miss World USA evidently thought they might bring their organization into disrepute for being racist and offensive.
Their interaction with Ms. Zhu about her offensive social media posts may have tended to confirm that she was ill-suited to represent their organization.
Everyone has the right to speak his/her mind, but, not free of social consequences. If what you say tends to harm the reputation of your employer, they can fire you for it.
Most employment situations are at will in the USA. Your employer can generally fire you for any reason or for no reason at all.
Snowflake conservatives can't seem to get over the fact that there are social consequences for racist words and deeds.
Right, as evident by all the people losing their jobs for attacking the President on the grounds of his race, gender and physical appearance
Such is the lot of public servants anywhere in the world; if you can't stand the heat, a kitchen job probably isn't for you.
People were disciplined for attacking Obama's race
So, she's not a beauty contest winner, but rather just supposed to be a shallow corporate face? I think the organization is just exposing itself if that's the case.
Examples of what you're talking about, FrostKing, aren't hard to find if you look for them:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ksn...president/amp/
https://www.pennlive.com/nation-worl...oes-viral.html
https://thenib.com/i-was-fired-for-criticizing-trump
https://lawandcrime.com/first-amendm...icizing-trump/
Last edited by Winehole23; 07-23-2019 at 10:12 AM.
You seem to be unfamiliar with what beauty pageants are and what the winners are generally required to do.
The winners limit themselves contractually; they agree not to do and say things that will reflect badly on the org they have been hired to represent. As you say, this perhaps reflects worse on the org than the representative.
This is about as far away from being censorship or 1st Amendment infringement as you can get.
It may have always been that way; but more and more in this social media world, these contests are exposing themselves as narrow minded and completely averse to "beauty". They want hollow vessels. They may as well just build a woman robot and call it a day.
WTF are you talking about?
In other contexts you've characterized stuff like this as "censorship" and "fascism."
If that's not your take here, please disregard the remark.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
