Defense Atty Alan Tucker says "the video has been in possession of police since day one."
Defense Atty Alan Tucker says "the video has been in possession of police since day one."
Nah the cops had the video since day 1 he claims.
Some falling out between Atty Alan Tucker and William Bryan? Like he didn't pay his bill. Thus atty releases video.
its true that the cops had the video since day 1. those cops never pressed charges
then the lawyer leaked the video to the public, which prompted an investigation by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (independent from the Glynn County Police Department who sat on the case), leading to the charges/arrests
Right. So he had his client right where he wants him, safely in the hands of the local Dept of Bubba Justice.
Getting off scott free.
So why leak the video two months later? Which causes your Bubba client to get charged.
Jeez you're stupid.
you can read articles discussing just this and his comments for why he released the video
Read some of them an his comments just adds to the confusion as to he the attys motive:
"If he had just frozen, he wouldn’t have gotten shot."
psssh. Calls for speculation and assumes fact not in evidence.
Atty does say that he himself did not see the video until April 30th. Huh?
I watched that video of the victim being detained and questions (and tazed) in a park and it make me mad. Mostly because even after the guy leaves on foot, the head cop wants to tow the guys vehicle, get inside and find basically anything to arrest him for. That's a real move and should get him kicked off the force. His own boss had to tell him to piss off.
Arrest the barber
Who charged who?
You're talking manslaughter, not murder. Ultimately, it was self defense to shoot the idiot charging at them.
They had already called 911. Being a rent-a-cop may be distasteful in your world view; but we've learned what we always have known; it's not murder.
You're just part of the lynch mob, Lite. Let that sink in.
Cuckback.
What's your legal argument here? All I see is emotion.
you dont know what manslaughter means
Chump impressions won't get you w's.
Oh, look; David Dook is attention whoring.
I asked you a question.
You're attention whoring by whining about it.
What is your legal argument here? Be sure to use Georgia statute and case law.
if you cause the provocation that leads to the killing, that's not going to get your murder reduced to manslaughter
yeah he was relentless. asked him multiple times for permission to search (was told to off the first time before the second cop arrived), pretended to smell weed, pretended to see weed, asked the second cop to take a sniff (as if he's a drug dog), and then was practically begging to find any way to have the car towed/searched... even went so far as to basically suggest that if he just chose to arrest him earlier that he then could have searched the car
just ridiculous. doesnt even mean Arbery was acting politely or without su ion, but the police conduct stands on its own
If you want to argue that they shouldn't be charged with man slaughter for this guy's miserable knockout game failure, I'm fine with that.
Murder takes intent. Calling 911 shows that that was not their intent, bruh.
Lynch Mobster Lite
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)