That was mean
Your lardass is still here on ST?
That was mean
That's the stupidest bet I've ever seen.
Of course they won't pass. There was never any disagreement about their plausibility. BECAUSE REPUBLICANS.
Again, wtf are you still here fat ?
Oh not the mean republicans who want to uphold our Cons ution... Say it ain't so!
Well of course it doesn't pass, when idiot ideologues who only care about your own stockpiles and pay lipservice to those poor disenfranchised minorities can't have their ARs for self-defense oho those poor blacks but muh Chicago
I'll bet you $10,000 there is another school shooting in the next 12 months with an AR-15. How bout that, ?
Oh Joey's in my mentions again despite the fact I haven't read one of his replies in years.
Wow you're so hard! So you bet on school shootings huh; says a lot about who you truly are.
You're so full of bro. Btw who the remembers people's actual names here? Yall weirdos are obsessed. Bro delete that photo of my legs off your laptop before your boyfriend finds it.
hopefully you get gunned down in the next one
Insecure kori clarifying his job regarding the inking of dudes butts
Last edited by Blake; 05-25-2022 at 09:04 PM.
You act like you have two. So does Trump.
But what about gun collectors? can somebody think of gun collectors?
So we just need to give up and there's nothing that can be done, the merits of anything. Got it. That got us here.
Two teens arrested in 'mass casualty' plot in 2018 targeting a Uvalde middle school
https://www.kens5.com/article/news/c.../273-548565605
shut up ElNono. There's $10k on the line here. Waiting on CC to respond. I'm sure he will. Have you heard from Mr. Ramos yet?
Well then be realistic with your proposals. I will never bet against evil people.
There's nothing unrealistic with those proposals. As a matter of fact, most of those are indeed current regulation in a lot of other first-world countries that don't have this problem.
Heck, most of them are mere inconveniences(!). Wait 30 days, get checked every two years, get insurance.
DMC needs a reason! He can't think of any
- Every gun owner must take federally mandated training, tailored to the gun they own, includes mental health check. Must repeat every 2 years or just serve and qualify, problem solved --- sure, if you're military, waiver could be considered. But a mental health check would still be required. Because, you know "MENTAL HEALTH"
- ​
- 30 day waiting period on new gun purchases this needs to have a reason. the current wait is for background checks - 30 days would prevent most mass shootings, see Uvalde
- Private gun sales must go through federal broker, also subject to 30 day waiting period Then it's not a private gun sale if another FFL has to broker it. Also unenforceable - GREAT! IF unenforceable, just outlaw it. I was trying to be accomadable, but if it doesn't work just ban private sales!
- Ban clips larger than 10, confiscate anything larger Most clips only hold 4 rounds. I think you mean magazines which your suggestion is unenforceable since they aren't serialized or recorded and 10's of millions exist already, but if you meant clips then sure, I'm all for the Mauser and Steyr having limited capacity clips. LMAO CLIPS MAGAZINES who gives a about terminology. No more than 10 bullets without reloading. How about that?
- ​
- Limit ammo purchases everywhere except shooting ranges. Can rent larger clips at the shooting range. Cannot take ammo or large clips from shooting ranges home with you Ammo purchases have been limited for over a year, 2 boxes per person. Uh huh. Define a "box"
- ​
- Raise minimum age of gun ownership to 21 So military folks can bomb cities, fire off AA and miniguns and even get shot but cannot own a firearm personally. Absou inglutely signing a contract with the military and fulfilling service completely differentiates.
- Must carry gun insurance. Insurance company financially liable for any crime committed with said gun The insurance would have to be personal insurance, not gun insurance. Else for every gun you'd need another policy. This is silly. This would not prevent mass shootings.
- ​Good. For every gun you own, it gets more expensive. Doesn't hurt the single white female who wants to self protect, hurts the small preppers like you
- ​
- Gun owners are criminally liable if their gun is used in a crime, or accidental shooting by a child, and they are shown to have not properly protected it (locked in safe for example) You'd need to enact a federal registry to know who owned what gun
- PERFECT
- Ban military-style protective armor This makes no sense. You have no logical reason to ban people from owning and wearing bullet resistant clothing, and no way to police the sale or ownership of it
- ​Oh it makes total sense, the only people who want that are a threat
What is so confusing?
I bet you there will be another school shooting in the next 12 months. I will put $10,000 in escrow. You match it.
If there is ANY gun reform enacted in the next 12 months, you win my $10,000. With or without a school shooting.
Deal?
The bitter truth.
I think the idea on "unrealistic" here is in the sense that Republicans congressmen will never vote for this, because they know their gun-fellating audience. Democrats will manage to over-promise and under-achieve, as they usually do.
This conservative SCOTUS will also make sure to find a passage from The Federalist in 1752 that explicitly said "Muskets should be reloaded as many times as needed" to mean a 100 round magazine is a CoNs uTiOnAl RiGhT.
If that's what we mean by "unrealistic", then it's not. It only means that's our reality and we need to slowly change it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)