Don't pick Darrin or so help him God he'll vote for Trump.
Yeah just checked, NY peaked at 800 deaths / day in April.
Looks like DarrinS made another alt right rounding error.
Don't pick Darrin or so help him God he'll vote for Trump.
You mean Drumpf! Darrin calls him Drumpf because he’s very unbiased and doesn’t like Trump at all, which means every time he compliments DRUMPF it’s a VERY CREDIBLE opinion and it means DRUMPF must be performing very well as President, cause it’s not like Darrin would call him DRUMPF if he was just another partisan hack.
So many honest brokers support Trump-- he must be doing a great job!
No kidding! Outside of Ducks, Chris and Derp, everyone on this site who’s complimentary of Trump doesn’t like him, didn’t vote for him, would have voted for Biden in 2016 if he had run, and is just giving an unbiased nonpartisan opinion that he’s an objectively great president.
cool
thanks...
Update (2 August 2020):::
Trump's Corona Plague dead: 158,365+
tholdren conspiracy dead: <gossip, hence not published>
Regular Flu dead: 23+k
Spanish Flu dead: 275k
Obama's H1N1 Flu dead: 12.5k
Let us proceed..
How Many People in the U.S. Are Hospitalized With COVID-19? Who Knows?
The Trump administration told hospitals to stop reporting data to the CDC, and report it to HHS instead. Vice President Mike Pence said the information would continue to be released publicly. It hasn’t worked out as promised.
, the move has created widespread confusion, leaving some states in the dark about their hospitals’ remaining bed and intensive care capacity and, at least temporarily, removing this information from public view. As a result, it has been unclear how many people are in hospitals being treated for COVID-19 at a time when the number of infected patients nationally has been soaring.
Hospitalizations for COVID-19 have been seen as a key metric of both the coronavirus’s toll and the health care system’s ability to deal with it.
the website for the administration’s new portal promised to update numbers on a daily basis, but, as of Friday morning,
the site hadn’t been updated since July 23.
“The most pernicious portion of it is that at the state level and at the regional level
we lost our situational awareness,”
the rollout of this has been absolutely a catastrophe.”
These problems mean that
our hospitalization data — a crucial metric of the COVID-19 pandemic — is, for now, unreliable, and
likely an undercount.
We do not think that either the state-level hospitalization data or the new federal data is reliable in isolation,”
https://www.propublica.org/article/h...d-19-who-knows
Go as intended "flooding the zone with " and/or blackout/LIE by omission.
in the ing MIDDLE of the exploding ing Trump-Made Pandemic,
Trash HIDES how ing mortally disastrous his ing show is.
So a bit under a thousand a day?
April 17 -- 1025
Maybe worldometers made an alt right rounding error.
Maybe you are an idiot who still doesn't understand how data is compiled and reported after months of reading about it here.
Did all the deaths reported for that day, die on that day?
What was the count the day before? The day after?
you don't have to be an idiot not to know about backfilling or any other technical aspect of compiling data. not everyone is a stats nerd like you, RG.
Yeah thats one day, but in the April bunch of dates, a bit under a thousand.
Meh, I saw the value of just over a thousand on worldometers. If their data is inaccurate, I don't see how that's on me.
I mean, I see that San Antonio does this, e.g.
"According to the city’s website, 16 additional deaths were announced. Thirteen of those deaths happened between July 4 - July 22 but weren’t reported to the San Antonio Metropolitan Health District until Sunday, officials said."
The data is just what they a happen to receive on a certain day.
The data gets better if you look at it over a longer time period.
Which is why so many of these graphs display the x axis as a bar (histogram). And then do some different types of averaging when they then draw it as a continuous line. We know we cant count deaths, infections, etc... in really small units of time because we dont receive it that way.
If you have a device that can track a moving object through very tiny units of time you get a more accurate view of its instantaneous and average speed.
We cant do this with data gathered in a counting fashion. This is something the foldren has huge trouble with.
Not being defensive. Merely frustrated at your seeming ignorance, and gleeful disregard for the truth.
Darrin loves to play coy.
"I don't want to take the personal responsibility to understand what I read"
Do you understand the difference between deaths reported on a day, and the number of people that actually died that day?
I do. Does worldometers make that distinction?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)