Reply With Quote
Lame.
http://gawker.com/5674353/i-had-a-on...stine-odonnell
highlight:
Im no fan of christine but what gawker did was pretty damn pathetic. this is basically slander. Misleading le, there really wasnt anything wrong what she did at that story. but the pics are damn good.But there were signs that she wasn't very experienced sexually. When her underwear came off, I immediately noticed that the waxing trend had completely passed her by.
Last edited by DJ Mbenga; 10-28-2010 at 11:55 PM.
Lame.
That's some cowardly bull right there.
What a ing loser.
so her claim a few weeks ago that she's "chaste" was maybe true?
40 years old, kinda cute, but never been screwed?
If Christine is such a loser and a joke of a candidate, why are the libs wasting their time with her? Why are dem honchos in Delaware, campaigning for her opponent - when all the polls show he has a significant lead?
I think libs are afraid of conservative women...
This stunt is beyond de able, and if it had been done to a lib, we'd never hear the end of it. I hope it backfires and Christine wins because of the sympathy vote!
What else do they have? Libs like them some soft targets.
Why isn't there a massive media assault on Alvin Greene? Hmmm.
Why wouldn't Democrats campaign for a Democrat?
I think they would prefer a more liberal candidate win.I think libs are afraid of conservative women...
Yes, because you would be repeating it over and over if you thought it was to your side's advantage.This stunt is beyond de able, and if it had been done to a lib, we'd never hear the end of it.Sympathy from whom?I hope it backfires and Christine wins because of the sympathy vote!
Hirsute born-again virgins?
SMOKING GUN: 'GAWKER' PAID CASH FOR BOGUS SEX SMEAR ON CHRISTINE O'DONNELL?
Not only are Liberals freaking out, they're making up.
Nothing new.
Breitbart and his fake pimp/ho are still way out front.
While Gawker admits that it paid for the story, as most editors do, there is no indication that the story is false.....
What's the scandal?
Isn't it 'cheating' as O'Donell has said about masturbation? Or is it ok to play the double standard?Im no fan of christine but what gawker did was pretty damn pathetic. this is basically slander. Misleading le, there really wasnt anything wrong what she did at that story. but the pics are damn good.
A lack of trust
Again, what did she do that disqualifies her from the Senate?
There's no indication that it's true either.
...except the photos..
Do you take home every person you take pictures with/of in a bar?
Photos of what?
God dammit, it takes some pretty stupid bull to drag me into a conversation defending Christine O'Donnell.
Y'all can have this one.
You're not alone.
NOW issued a statement condemning Gawker's rancid story while still expressing their desire O'Donnell loses the race.
Well, if I'm at a bar, someone is getting poked by me that night...so yeah...
quitter.
So, now your quoting NOW.....WOW!
A. You're ing liar.@ "if I'm at a bar, someone is getting poked by me that night..."
B. Not everyone that goes to a bar is a /horn dog looking to get laid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
